Pages:
Author

Topic: 【 BOT 】 C.A.T. Cryptsy Automatic Trader 1 [email protected] (Old Topic Beta1-Beta3V8) - page 30. (Read 151156 times)

legendary
Activity: 2632
Merit: 1040
800 bucks for a shit coin trader ?

LOL

Ok, nvm, i thought it was for CAT coin XD


I see only 1 shit here, and it's not my trader.  Wink
hero member
Activity: 812
Merit: 500
800 bucks for a shit coin trader ?

LOL

Ok, nvm, i thought it was for CAT coin XD
sr. member
Activity: 378
Merit: 265
Version for 1 BTC still available for sell?
Does it run under Linux?
legendary
Activity: 2632
Merit: 1040
In the next version i have add a label under the Quantity with the "minimum quantity required for order creation".
sr. member
Activity: 462
Merit: 500
If the API Return is not correct (not in ascending order) the value i use (the first on top of the queue) could be wrong.
I think i will wrote a routine to sort the array in ascending order.

Yup, this problem is definitely happening...just had another one...

Quote
Your Open Orders
Order Date   Price (LTC)   Type   JKC (Orig)   JKC (Remain)   Total (LTC)   Action
2014-01-13 09:04:05   0.00000285   Buy   105546.33216783   105546.33216783   0.30080705   Cancel
2014-01-13 09:19:49   0.00163525   Buy   40.54609998   1.02073214   0.00166915   Cancel
2014-01-13 09:19:49   0.00163525   Buy   27.27565815   27.27565815   0.04460252   Cancel
2014-01-13 09:23:09   0.00182091   Sell   35.49536220   35.49536220   0.06463386   Cancel
legendary
Activity: 2632
Merit: 1040

Sampey, me again   Grin,

I've think I've just seen this behaviour :

I've got multiple buy PINGS running on the same market at different prices.

e.g. JKC/BTC (BUY)
                    JKC                        LTC
0.00171004     510.87392408           0.87361485
0.00171003     3.99042287           0.22682366

Now both of these are (I think) 100% my orders i.e. nobody else in there

Problem is, at lookup, the 171003 order sees the 171004 order and thinks this is someone else, so it ups its order to 171005.
Then the 171004 order sees the new order at 171005 and thinks this is someone else, so ups its order to 171006.

You can see where this is going....with no actual competing bidders, CAT raises the price of my orders on every refresh, thus competing against myself !!!

The bid goes up and and up until I have pushed the price up and the buy sell % margin is too low.

What CAT should be doing is realising that there is no need to beat the current top bid....as its 100% myself !


Does CAT take account of this, or did I get it wrong  and maybe there were other users orders in there ? Undecided

thanks!



I must check the code but i remember that C.A.T. remove your orders from calculation
sr. member
Activity: 462
Merit: 500

Sampey, me again   Grin,

I've think I've just seen this behaviour :

I've got multiple buy PINGS running on the same market at different prices.

e.g. JKC/BTC (BUY)
                    JKC                        LTC
0.00171004     510.87392408           0.87361485
0.00171003     3.99042287           0.22682366

Now both of these are (I think) 100% my orders i.e. nobody else in there

Problem is, at lookup, the 171003 order sees the 171004 order and thinks this is someone else, so it ups its order to 171005.
Then the 171004 order sees the new order at 171005 and thinks this is someone else, so ups its order to 171006.

You can see where this is going....with no actual competing bidders, CAT raises the price of my orders on every refresh, thus competing against myself !!!

The bid goes up and and up until I have pushed the price up and the buy sell % margin is too low.

What CAT should be doing is realising that there is no need to beat the current top bid....as its 100% myself !


Does CAT take account of this, or did I get it wrong  and maybe there were other users orders in there ? Undecided

thanks!

sr. member
Activity: 462
Merit: 500
Great stuff, thanks....otherwise still very stable !!  Smiley
legendary
Activity: 2632
Merit: 1040
Sampey,

I've noticed one or two orders placed by CAT at crazy prices.

e.g.

(Cryptsy)
 Your Open Orders
Order Date   Price (LTC)   Type   DVC (Orig)   DVC (Remain)   Total (LTC)   Action
2014-01-12 23:03:21   0.02909999   Sell   18403.45950640   18403.45950640   535.54048760   Cancel
2014-01-12 23:03:21   0.02909999   Sell   6473.83491820   6473.83491820   188.38853138   Cancel

(CAT)
28878587   Sell   18403.45950640   18403.45950640   0.02909999   0.00002112
28878588   Sell   6473.83491820   6473.83491820   0.02909999   0.00002104

DVC price is currently around 0.00002000 !!!!

Nothing of note in the Errors.

I looked to find a log file holding the General Log history to see why/where these orders were placed but can't find it ?

Is this saved anywhere ?

thanks

I think these orders will be recreated, but i think the problem could be in this call :

Quote
Method: marketorders

Inputs:

marketid   Market ID for which you are querying


Outputs: 2 Arrays. First array is sellorders listing current open sell orders ordered price ascending. Second array is buyorders listing current open buy orders ordered price descending.

sellprice   If a sell order, price which order is selling at
buyprice   If a buy order, price the order is buying at
quantity   Quantity on order
total   Total value of order (price * quantity)

If the API Return is not correct (not in ascending order) the value i use (the first on top of the queue) could be wrong.
I think i will wrote a routine to sort the array in ascending order.
sr. member
Activity: 462
Merit: 500
Sampey,

I've noticed one or two orders placed by CAT at crazy prices.

e.g.

(Cryptsy)
 Your Open Orders
Order Date   Price (LTC)   Type   DVC (Orig)   DVC (Remain)   Total (LTC)   Action
2014-01-12 23:03:21   0.02909999   Sell   18403.45950640   18403.45950640   535.54048760   Cancel
2014-01-12 23:03:21   0.02909999   Sell   6473.83491820   6473.83491820   188.38853138   Cancel

(CAT)
28878587   Sell   18403.45950640   18403.45950640   0.02909999   0.00002112
28878588   Sell   6473.83491820   6473.83491820   0.02909999   0.00002104

DVC price is currently around 0.00002000 !!!!

Nothing of note in the Errors.

I looked to find a log file holding the General Log history to see why/where these orders were placed but can't find it ?

Is this saved anywhere ?

thanks
rcg
newbie
Activity: 16
Merit: 0

2) Inject a new PING buy order (putting more cash into the market) to get some trades happening (but does increase our exposure to market)


This looks like scaling, I'ts very risky.  We can use it when we have opened a small order only




In fact, it might be nice to have a global calculation of losses on all open markets and then sell all at current best price (which people have asked for) as part of the program exit.

Your thoughts people !?

yes it would be nice
rcg
newbie
Activity: 16
Merit: 0
when we have altcoin balance on cryptsy, maybe is there chance looking for rising markets.
sr. member
Activity: 462
Merit: 500
Morning all,

Heres a suggestion...

Sometimes we get stuck in a market...we have high sell PONGs or low buy PONGs. We look at the chart for today, and (if its a nice level price  Smiley), it doesn't look like any of our trades will be executed soon. C.A.T. has all its trading pool tied up in waiting trades, and so nothing happens.

At this point I would either

1) Sit it out and wait for price movement (could take some time and we miss out on possible margin gains)
2) Inject a new PING buy order (putting more cash into the market) to get some trades happening (but does increase our exposure to market)
3) Decide to cancel all orders. Buys return to BTC (or LTC, XPM), sells return to the coin balance. Stop execution, then restart market with an initial PING sell on the full coin balance.

Whenever we do step 3, we lose some money. How much is determined by what each of the stuck orders was bought or sold at and what we will get for them at the current price. It would be great if there was a button to calculate this amount - "Loss on Market Exit", and another button to then execute these steps - 'Cancel Orders & Restart Market'. At least we can make a quick and informed decision if it is worth it. Another plus of this is that the loss can also be added to the Global Gains sheet. At the moment when we do these steps, the loss not listed anywhere and can lead to us thinking we are doing better than we actually are !

Would people want a choice to do this only on PING buy trades and not PING sells ? (The logic being if you did a PING sell, you sold high and then expect to buy low - and markets always have a good chance of falling!)

In fact, it might be nice to have a global calculation of losses on all open markets and then sell all at current best price (which people have asked for) as part of the program exit.

Your thoughts people !?
full member
Activity: 137
Merit: 100
I would absolutely pay for a quality, comprehensive strategy guide for CAT ---- there really is just the bare bones advice on here to get going.  I know what the functions are, but barely know where to begin strategy-wise.  Anyone willing to put one together?
sr. member
Activity: 462
Merit: 500
Umm...question Sampey...whats going wrong here ?

See last line, last column Tot Cum Gain....its gone down despite the Total Gain being positive (+ 0.00368593) ??

Quote
2014-01-12 19:38:34   ASC/LTC   Sell   0.00007078   571.93493102   0.00012263   Buy   0.00007009   577.56527322   0.00008096   0.00020359   0.00019492   0.00481842   0.17261493
2014-01-12 19:48:41   NET/LTC   Buy   0.00065921   269.39655172   0.00035518   Sell   0.00067492   269.39655172   0.00054546   0.00090064   0.00333157   0.03108383   0.17963244
2014-01-12 19:48:41   NET/LTC   Buy   0.00065921   298.04980074   0.00039295   Sell   0.00067492   298.04980074   0.00060348   0.00099643   0.00368593   0.02775225   0.17630086

thanks!

I Think the line above

2014-01-12 19:48:41   NET/LTC   Buy   0.00065921   269.39655172   0.00035518   Sell   0.00067492   269.39655172   0.00054546   0.00090064   0.00333157   0.03108383   0.17963244

Was after (in chronological order) this line

2014-01-12 19:48:41   NET/LTC   Buy   0.00065921   298.04980074   0.00039295   Sell   0.00067492   298.04980074   0.00060348   0.00099643   0.00368593   0.02775225   0.17630086

Have you sort this table?
Problem is the timeStamp, Absolutedly equal,

Ahhh...yes that would make sense. Table had been sorted before but was reverted to sort by Timestamp. No bug is always a good conclusion !

legendary
Activity: 2632
Merit: 1040
Umm...question Sampey...whats going wrong here ?

See last line, last column Tot Cum Gain....its gone down despite the Total Gain being positive (+ 0.00368593) ??

Quote
2014-01-12 19:38:34   ASC/LTC   Sell   0.00007078   571.93493102   0.00012263   Buy   0.00007009   577.56527322   0.00008096   0.00020359   0.00019492   0.00481842   0.17261493
2014-01-12 19:48:41   NET/LTC   Buy   0.00065921   269.39655172   0.00035518   Sell   0.00067492   269.39655172   0.00054546   0.00090064   0.00333157   0.03108383   0.17963244
2014-01-12 19:48:41   NET/LTC   Buy   0.00065921   298.04980074   0.00039295   Sell   0.00067492   298.04980074   0.00060348   0.00099643   0.00368593   0.02775225   0.17630086

thanks!

I Think the line above

2014-01-12 19:48:41   NET/LTC   Buy   0.00065921   269.39655172   0.00035518   Sell   0.00067492   269.39655172   0.00054546   0.00090064   0.00333157   0.03108383   0.17963244

Was after (in chronological order) this line

2014-01-12 19:48:41   NET/LTC   Buy   0.00065921   298.04980074   0.00039295   Sell   0.00067492   298.04980074   0.00060348   0.00099643   0.00368593   0.02775225   0.17630086

Have you sort this table?
Problem is the timeStamp, Absolutedly equal,
sr. member
Activity: 462
Merit: 500
Umm...question Sampey...whats going wrong here ?

See last line, last column Tot Cum Gain....its gone down despite the Total Gain being positive (+ 0.00368593) ??

Quote
2014-01-12 19:38:34   ASC/LTC   Sell   0.00007078   571.93493102   0.00012263   Buy   0.00007009   577.56527322   0.00008096   0.00020359   0.00019492   0.00481842   0.17261493
2014-01-12 19:48:41   NET/LTC   Buy   0.00065921   269.39655172   0.00035518   Sell   0.00067492   269.39655172   0.00054546   0.00090064   0.00333157   0.03108383   0.17963244
2014-01-12 19:48:41   NET/LTC   Buy   0.00065921   298.04980074   0.00039295   Sell   0.00067492   298.04980074   0.00060348   0.00099643   0.00368593   0.02775225   0.17630086

thanks!
sr. member
Activity: 462
Merit: 500
Just my 2 cents, but Cryptsy does seem to have gotten quicker/more responsive over the last week or so. Feels a lot less laggy. Perhaps the promised server additions finally made it. They also have changed at least some of the coding in the last few days - charts have changed.

BTW Sampey - new version seems very stable, I have it running 24/7 and have had few problems - just one market hang yesterday on SXC (no errors to report).

[Edit] also this slight issue....buy and sell at same price Huh??

Quote
2014-01-12 13:16:32   Buy   0.00000133   240.00000000   0.00000064   Sell   0.00000133   240.00000000   0.00000096   0.00000160   -0.00000160   0.00004734
2014-01-12 13:16:32   Buy   0.00000133   120.00000000   0.00000032   Sell   0.00000133   120.00000000   0.00000048   0.00000080   -0.00000080   0.00004654
2014-01-12 13:16:32   Buy   0.00000133   240.00000000   0.00000064   Sell   0.00000133   240.00000000   0.00000096   0.00000160   -0.00000160   0.00004494

What parameters have you set???
Because without parameter set this is not possible  Huh

This was on FFC/BTC, Min gain 0.6%, Never/Buy Sell Directly

Don't you have set a "Sell All If...." parameter??

Not on this market...FFC been moving high %'s this last week. I'm tired of getting negatives on coins that drop -20% then bounce back. Once you've sold at a loss...you've sold at a loss and thats that, CAT never moves fast enough to capitalise on the rebound. At least if you stick it out you have a (small) chance of recovery. I have little exposure to this market anyway  Smiley
legendary
Activity: 2632
Merit: 1040
Just my 2 cents, but Cryptsy does seem to have gotten quicker/more responsive over the last week or so. Feels a lot less laggy. Perhaps the promised server additions finally made it. They also have changed at least some of the coding in the last few days - charts have changed.

BTW Sampey - new version seems very stable, I have it running 24/7 and have had few problems - just one market hang yesterday on SXC (no errors to report).

[Edit] also this slight issue....buy and sell at same price Huh??

Quote
2014-01-12 13:16:32   Buy   0.00000133   240.00000000   0.00000064   Sell   0.00000133   240.00000000   0.00000096   0.00000160   -0.00000160   0.00004734
2014-01-12 13:16:32   Buy   0.00000133   120.00000000   0.00000032   Sell   0.00000133   120.00000000   0.00000048   0.00000080   -0.00000080   0.00004654
2014-01-12 13:16:32   Buy   0.00000133   240.00000000   0.00000064   Sell   0.00000133   240.00000000   0.00000096   0.00000160   -0.00000160   0.00004494

What parameters have you set???
Because without parameter set this is not possible  Huh

This was on FFC/BTC, Min gain 0.6%, Never/Buy Sell Directly

Don't you have set a "Sell All If...." parameter??
sr. member
Activity: 462
Merit: 500
Just my 2 cents, but Cryptsy does seem to have gotten quicker/more responsive over the last week or so. Feels a lot less laggy. Perhaps the promised server additions finally made it. They also have changed at least some of the coding in the last few days - charts have changed.

BTW Sampey - new version seems very stable, I have it running 24/7 and have had few problems - just one market hang yesterday on SXC (no errors to report).

[Edit] also this slight issue....buy and sell at same price Huh??

Quote
2014-01-12 13:16:32   Buy   0.00000133   240.00000000   0.00000064   Sell   0.00000133   240.00000000   0.00000096   0.00000160   -0.00000160   0.00004734
2014-01-12 13:16:32   Buy   0.00000133   120.00000000   0.00000032   Sell   0.00000133   120.00000000   0.00000048   0.00000080   -0.00000080   0.00004654
2014-01-12 13:16:32   Buy   0.00000133   240.00000000   0.00000064   Sell   0.00000133   240.00000000   0.00000096   0.00000160   -0.00000160   0.00004494

What parameters have you set???
Because without parameter set this is not possible  Huh

This was on FFC/BTC, Min gain 0.6%, Never/Buy Sell Directly
Pages:
Jump to: