Topic: Bounties managed by team themselves - page 6. (Read 864 times)
not everything is like that, there are also paid managers who manage their own campaigns to be trusted, but we analyze all of them first if the rules are too complicated we better find other gift projects that are easy and trustworthy.
One of the biggest advantages of hiring a bounty manager is that they already have access to a huge community build around them and whenever they hire that bounty manager they will instantly get access to that community.
Yes, that’s the advantage of hiring a bounty manager coming from the forum especially if the one that been hired is already have huge community. I think it will not only help to boost the community about the project not only in the forum but in the other platform like telegram, twitter and medium. I’m sure that those bounty participants will easily make their minds to join if they know that they could trust them but all in all there still risk in the side of bounty hunters and investors. Every project could be scam not just for the beginning but also even they already launch and been launch for a long time.
It's dangerous to promote projects that's been managed by team themselves, they can break their rules themselves, we noticed something like this with first round of Oikos bounty where the manager almost ruin everything, few members almost create a scam accusation about the project before the CEO fixed things himself
One of the biggest advantages of hiring a bounty manager is that they already have access to a huge community build around them and whenever they hire that bounty manager they will instantly get access to that community.
I think you are misunderstanding about what has already talked above and it's about when the people from the team manage the bounty and it will much more dangerous compared with when it was managed by the bounty service. They didn't hire because the guy from their team was managing the bounty. I'm not here to discourage you about bounty campaigns that are managed by the project team themselves, I'm here to tell you that you need to be extremely cautious, I've noticed that team managing campaigns themselves is not good
1. They have all the freedom of doing any how with your rewards
2. They can change certain rules that aren't reasonable, just because it's their project and they are handling the distribution they are free to do some bad things
3. Bounty Managers are very very important, you can get them nailed for not facing the team to force them to do distribution but you can't fight the team yourself
I'm sure I'm not the only one who sees things this way, or am I?
I agree with you, bounty manager are important for manage there bounty, almost every own team managing bounty not distributed or scam i see this in my whole bounty life because if project team is fake then hunter are don’t know that hunter are don’t know which project good or which project scam, so i think bounty manager definitely important.. 1. They have all the freedom of doing any how with your rewards
2. They can change certain rules that aren't reasonable, just because it's their project and they are handling the distribution they are free to do some bad things
3. Bounty Managers are very very important, you can get them nailed for not facing the team to force them to do distribution but you can't fight the team yourself
I'm sure I'm not the only one who sees things this way, or am I?
I'm not here to discourage you about bounty campaigns that are managed by the project team themselves, I'm here to tell you that you need to be extremely cautious, I've noticed that team managing campaigns themselves is not good
1. They have all the freedom of doing any how with your rewards
2. They can change certain rules that aren't reasonable, just because it's their project and they are handling the distribution they are free to do some bad things
3. Bounty Managers are very very important, you can get them nailed for not facing the team to force them to do distribution but you can't fight the team yourself
I'm sure I'm not the only one who sees things this way, or am I?
I think not all the project managed by the team are failed,there are some successful project that managed only by the team themselves. But i also encounter and experienced joining a project managed by the team and after two years still no update regarding the progress of the project but sometimes they become visible in the community to give some hope but i don't think this project will become visible in the market..still hoping. 1. They have all the freedom of doing any how with your rewards
2. They can change certain rules that aren't reasonable, just because it's their project and they are handling the distribution they are free to do some bad things
3. Bounty Managers are very very important, you can get them nailed for not facing the team to force them to do distribution but you can't fight the team yourself
I'm sure I'm not the only one who sees things this way, or am I?
I don't see much difference here, if the project has free time then I believe they will manage their own campaigns. As for distribution, I think it is completely project-dependent, managing bounty cannot influence their decisions either.
Depending on those projects, I've seen many successful bounty managed by the team. Like the OKS campaign I'm participating in, they successfully managed the first round and immediately distributed it to the participants in just 14 days.
That's right. I also participated in the second round and hope to get the best from the OKS team. Acutally, it's only depend on the team or BM who are honest or not on their works. Sometimes, some BM create so many accounts because multiple accounts are allowed in the forum and run more bounties without any research or don't care for the bounty hunters. Besides, there are some BM who always think for the bounty hunters not just for themselves. In the end, it's only depend on the honesty whoever manage the bounty. 
One of the biggest advantages of hiring a bounty manager is that they already have access to a huge community build around them and whenever they hire that bounty manager they will instantly get access to that community.
Yes, if they hire a reputable manager in this market, they will surely receive a huge support community from them, if the project is budget-saving, they can manage themselves
Before a bounty manager can accept a job he must make sure he accept all conditions from the team, the bounty manager must follow exactly what the team want but let's take away the job from the bounty manager for a minute, if the team are to take over the bounty campaign won't they implement the same rules they give the bounty manager? Who so ever take the job, either BM or the team, all risks will still be available
One of the biggest advantages of hiring a bounty manager is that they already have access to a huge community build around them and whenever they hire that bounty manager they will instantly get access to that community.
Bounty managers enjoy this freedom.But I would say it should have rules.Many bounty managers accept Hunter's payments themselves.They have nothing to do next.The Hunters receive no reward for their suffering.That's why I say bounty managers need to be honest.
There is no difference here, if the team cheat bounty hunters their btt account will get red trust just as if any bounty manager cheat hunters too, some times even team do better job than bounty managers and they pay bounty hunters just as promised
I'm not here to discourage you about bounty campaigns that are managed by the project team themselves, I'm here to tell you that you need to be extremely cautious, I've noticed that team managing campaigns themselves is not good
1. They have all the freedom of doing any how with your rewards
2. They can change certain rules that aren't reasonable, just because it's their project and they are handling the distribution they are free to do some bad things
3. Bounty Managers are very very important, you can get them nailed for not facing the team to force them to do distribution but you can't fight the team yourself
I'm sure I'm not the only one who sees things this way, or am I?
1. They have all the freedom of doing any how with your rewards
2. They can change certain rules that aren't reasonable, just because it's their project and they are handling the distribution they are free to do some bad things
3. Bounty Managers are very very important, you can get them nailed for not facing the team to force them to do distribution but you can't fight the team yourself
I'm sure I'm not the only one who sees things this way, or am I?
Doesn't matter though,
1. Even if they hire a bounty manager, they can still do anything on how the rewards will be distributed.
2. Again, the same argument, they simply tell the manager that rules have change, and in turn, bounty managers can either decline to follow it, (then they are going to be kick out) or follow what the project wants
3. Bounty managers can just put a disclaimer in the beginning that they are not responsible if the project delay or don't do distribution on time. They are just the facilitator.
Two things are involved, it's either you are treated well or the team played you, it's still all same old risks about been a bounty hunter, you can
1. Get paid in half or full
2. Or you might not get anything at all
Either one of these will happen, if you want to be a good bounty hunter you must be ready for both the good and bad results
1. Get paid in half or full
2. Or you might not get anything at all
Either one of these will happen, if you want to be a good bounty hunter you must be ready for both the good and bad results
I like what bounty detective team are doing presently, there is no going back once a bounty got introduced by bounty detective because they use escrow, they handle the distribution at their own convenient time, you don't have to worry about not getting paid because all tokens are in bounty detective hand
Yes, I agree with your opinion. This is at least some kind of guarantee for the bounty hunters that the tokens will be paid. In addition, the detective bounty does not have a mandatory KYC check, which is also important for bounty hunters, since it does not take our time and does not create additional problems.As for the conduct of ICO bounty campaigns by a member of their team, I really noticed that for bounty hunters it is more risky with payment and such a team member often does not understand the specifics of our activities and quite often comes up with non-standard requirements that are not related to our activities, which creates additional difficulties.
Even if the project got bounty manager still they can't force the bounty team to pay the rewards for participants if they are refusing to do.Bounty manager is also need to be an important factor that everyone should consider but don't take it for granted, do your own research on the team as well.
Indeed, there is a little to no difference whether the bounty is managed by bounty hunter or the team itself since they will pay if they wanted to pay or turn into a scam. I have several experience about this scenario and bounty manager mostly can't do anything whenever the project decided not to pay the participants.
Even if the project got bounty manager still they can't force the bounty team to pay the rewards for participants if they are refusing to do.Bounty manager is also need to be an important factor that everyone should consider but don't take it for granted, do your own research on the team as well.
but reputable bounty manager would make any campaigns run smoother by saving the bounty pools to escrow or to bounty manager itself, i have seen other managers to do that and most of them are paying and successful both the ieo and bounty events, but it doesnt mean you should rely on that. like you said, research for the teams behind the project is mandatoryMy opinion regarding about bounty programs if you are a participant - don't expect you will get the reward on time and with their target price.
Even reputable BMs are being screwed by these projects, unless they will give the allotted tokens to a particular escrow before the campaign begins.
Either way, the risk is still there, unless you join a btc paying campaign. That I can say has high chance of getting paid.
I think it all depends on the project itself and not entirely on who will manage the campaign.
I have experience joining in a campaign managed by member of the team but it turn out well.
Nevertheless a trusted manager is still better to have a high chance the rewards will be given accordingly.
I have experience joining in a campaign managed by member of the team but it turn out well.
Nevertheless a trusted manager is still better to have a high chance the rewards will be given accordingly.
They are doing that because they don't have any budget for marketing and to hired reputable bounty manager to manage the campaign. Instead of hiring they decide to one of them will manage it to reduce the possible cost if they hired manager. Campaign sometimes run for 3 months or more so they need to have budget for many months just for the manager alone.
Even if the project got bounty manager still they can't force the bounty team to pay the rewards for participants if they are refusing to do.Bounty manager is also need to be an important factor that everyone should consider but don't take it for granted, do your own research on the team as well.
but reputable bounty manager would make any campaigns run smoother by saving the bounty pools to escrow or to bounty manager itself, i have seen other managers to do that and most of them are paying and successful both the ieo and bounty events, but it doesnt mean you should rely on that. like you said, research for the teams behind the project is mandatory Jump to: