Do you agree that Bounty needs KYC?
In my opinion only, I will agree with this policy to avoid multiple accounts or the use of other accounts in bounties. If it has this policy it will be fair to investors and to bounty participants. Scams can be reduced to a bounty. Dumpers can also be reduced.
What is your Opinion?
Free comment.
Think about what you write here. Do you seriously think that in order to avoid a double account it is necessary that each signatory of the ICO provide a copy of his passport, a certificate from the bank on income, information about his place of residence and other confidential information? And to whom? Persons who in half the cases turn out to be scammers themselves? Have you ever tried to ask them a question on what basis do they require this information from you? And not general words about the need to test you for laundering your dirty money, even if you do not invest in these projects, or even such nonsense as if to make sure that you are not a US citizen, where participation in the ICO is prohibited. So it is forbidden to invest in ICO projects, or is it forbidden to advertise ICO projects as participants in the ICO signature campaign? Do not you see the difference? You are being deceived in the most arrogant way, and you are still giving them and encouraging that then your data appear in the public domain on the Internet, or even worse: after a while, police will come to your house with a search and then you will already explain in the office how in your name the property is registered by some tortured family bandits. In my opinion only, I will agree with this policy to avoid multiple accounts or the use of other accounts in bounties. If it has this policy it will be fair to investors and to bounty participants. Scams can be reduced to a bounty. Dumpers can also be reduced.
What is your Opinion?
Free comment.
