Topic: Bounties required KYC. - page 19. (Read 3475 times)
After the recent Hashcard scam, I'm very reluctant to do KYC for ICO investing, let alone bounties. Before that I thought it was a good idea as to stop multi accounts etc. I think there's better ways bounty managers can run the campaigns to stop cheaters then KYC.
I'm actually in doubt if i'm going to participate in bounties that requires KYC because we're talking about real identities here and its safety. But i just hope that our identities are all safe.
Isn't the way we fell uncomfortable when bounties required KYC, this is the way to eliminate scammers in the forum, using another accounts for the seek of their own. KYC is helping us, if people don't like it then it is better to look for bounties that don't ask KYC. 
Do you agree that Bounty needs KYC?
In my opinion only, I will agree with this policy to avoid multiple accounts or the use of other accounts in bounties. If it has this policy it will be fair to investors and to bounty participants. Scams can be reduced to a bounty. Dumpers can also be reduced.
What is your Opinion?
Free comment.
well for me, I think its good, to actually avoid multiple accounts. if the bounty campaign requires bounty hunter to do kyc, we dont have any other choice but to do it. if not, we're not able to receive what we work hard for. In my opinion only, I will agree with this policy to avoid multiple accounts or the use of other accounts in bounties. If it has this policy it will be fair to investors and to bounty participants. Scams can be reduced to a bounty. Dumpers can also be reduced.
What is your Opinion?
Free comment.
This is good idea for anti-cheating, but you know your KYC document doesn't release or they keep it safe ? This bounties is scam or not ? I don't want to risk my identity in just bounty campaign.
It would be dangerous to implement KYC in the bounties to come, besides many of the rewards are so low that they don't deserve your data, it would add a tedious step that would keep many people away. The only people you could ask for KYC would be the investors, to try to keep an accountability
Do you agree that Bounty needs KYC?
In my opinion only, I will agree with this policy to avoid multiple accounts or the use of other accounts in bounties. If it has this policy it will be fair to investors and to bounty participants. Scams can be reduced to a bounty. Dumpers can also be reduced.
What is your Opinion?
Free comment.
That is right bounty that has KYC requirements lessen and reduces those people who is just wanting to take advantage to others. This is really good idea for us to avoid many circumstances to get scammed. It always gives equal opportunity to all the bounty hunters out there to get more earning.In my opinion only, I will agree with this policy to avoid multiple accounts or the use of other accounts in bounties. If it has this policy it will be fair to investors and to bounty participants. Scams can be reduced to a bounty. Dumpers can also be reduced.
What is your Opinion?
Free comment.
Please look for the other side of the story. Not all ICOs that requires KYC is legitimate in the first place. Anyone can conduct ICO and they can tell anyone that they need to pass KYC application before they can invest in the project. What i am afraid of this KYC is that, it may leaked your information and its too dangerous because there is no guarantee that they will not use your information for any reason other than agreed upon. Specially, for ICO project which is a scam, its like they hit two birds in one stone. They got your money and at the same time they also got your information.
I'm actually in doubt if i'm going to participate in bounties that requires KYC because we're talking about real identities here and its safety. But i just hope that our identities are all safe.
Do you agree that Bounty needs KYC?
In my opinion only, I will agree with this policy to avoid multiple accounts or the use of other accounts in bounties. If it has this policy it will be fair to investors and to bounty participants. Scams can be reduced to a bounty. Dumpers can also be reduced.
What is your Opinion?
Free comment.
In my opinion only, I will agree with this policy to avoid multiple accounts or the use of other accounts in bounties. If it has this policy it will be fair to investors and to bounty participants. Scams can be reduced to a bounty. Dumpers can also be reduced.
What is your Opinion?
Free comment.
First, the kyc can be manipulated they can be faked the submissions, second you never know if these projects will last a long time and you do not know if the project is legit and if they are legit check their complaint, this is not a client to client relationship,about the bounty you get your tokens and they have your information for their disposal they can sell it to the third party t,prepare for future cases if your information falls into the wrong hands
Do you agree that Bounty needs KYC?
In my opinion only, I will agree with this policy to avoid multiple accounts or the use of other accounts in bounties. If it has this policy it will be fair to investors and to bounty participants. Scams can be reduced to a bounty. Dumpers can also be reduced.
What is your Opinion?
Free comment.
no I'm not, there are some advantages that we can get by having KYC but I dont see any reasons for bounty hunters to do kyc. we're not an investor. In my opinion only, I will agree with this policy to avoid multiple accounts or the use of other accounts in bounties. If it has this policy it will be fair to investors and to bounty participants. Scams can be reduced to a bounty. Dumpers can also be reduced.
What is your Opinion?
Free comment.
Do you agree that Bounty needs KYC?
In my opinion only, I will agree with this policy to avoid multiple accounts or the use of other accounts in bounties. If it has this policy it will be fair to investors and to bounty participants. Scams can be reduced to a bounty. Dumpers can also be reduced.
What is your Opinion?
Free comment.
In my opinion only, I will agree with this policy to avoid multiple accounts or the use of other accounts in bounties. If it has this policy it will be fair to investors and to bounty participants. Scams can be reduced to a bounty. Dumpers can also be reduced.
What is your Opinion?
Free comment.
In my opinion, it's because of many countries have regulations for crypto related transactions and thus participants are required to complete KYC for the purpose of verification.... On the other hand, I also disagree about that idea since we cannot be certain that our identities are safe.
I agree with you that KCY can avoid paying multiple accounts. And as time goes on, the regulation of encrypted currency will become more and more strict, and KCY is an unavoidable obstacle for policy.
KYC is good but what would happen if manager sell it? there are many good manager here but there are also bad manager and they will take advantage of this. for those dumpers they either sell it because they need money or they sell it because the price is high then after that it gets lower everyday.
I do not take any bounties that requires KYC to join with them. I think it is not advisable to get the information of the participants but be good to used it when investing in the ICO. Giving a personal information make fear because that can be used to get your account to be scammed. I do not think that they need to look for the info of the participants when they are just promoting the project. 
for me bounty hunter does not have to do kyc because we make any investment, and I also see a lot of bounty who ask for kyc but don't give token to the participants (scam) maybe some of them just need the identity we have I really hope the admin of this forum set new rules about bounty asking kyc to bounty hunter
I do agree too that bounties must have KYC to secure all the tokens and to make sure that the participants are not scammer. It is one way to give great security for the bounties
In my opinion, for bounty participants do not necessarily require to fill the KYC. Because we just work continue to get wages. We work to promote their projects and they should pay us. If for investor I have to fill KYC. It can avoid the project from false investors to avoid the loss of the project.
This idea is not very practical. How can you trust the bounty manager with your KYC documents? How can you be sure that he will not steal your ID information and use it elsewhere? IMO, having a Sr.Member level bitcointalk account is enough proof that you are serious about crypto.
I agree with this one. There is no such height as risking your identity because of a few bucks from bounty. Plus KYC needs trustworthy management like civic and velix.id. I myself don't want to risk my identity in just bounty campaign.
But we can go with it, KYC process if the valuation comes from the ICO provider itself having hired a third party. Not just in BM or moderator.
Do you agree that Bounty needs KYC?
In my opinion only, I will agree with this policy to avoid multiple accounts or the use of other accounts in bounties. If it has this policy it will be fair to investors and to bounty participants. Scams can be reduced to a bounty. Dumpers can also be reduced.
What is your Opinion?
Free comment.
In my opinion only, I will agree with this policy to avoid multiple accounts or the use of other accounts in bounties. If it has this policy it will be fair to investors and to bounty participants. Scams can be reduced to a bounty. Dumpers can also be reduced.
What is your Opinion?
Free comment.
Excuse me, KYC for reduced dumpers? I do not think it makes sense.
for those dumpers, they either sell it because they need money
That is the financial factors, why some people sell tokens that they get from a bounty. Does it have anything to do with KYC?I do not agree if I as bounty participants have to complete KYC. Because I am afraid my personal data is being misused!
And why do you really believe that KYC can reduce and can avoid the multiple accounts in bounties? Do you have the same thoughts as me? KYC and other complementary documents could have been manipulated by bounty participants. I am sure, they can do it.
So in my opinion, KYC is not the best solution to avoid multiple accounts in bounties, reduce the scammers and dumpers (that does not make sense).
KYC is good but what would happen if manager sell it? there are many good manager here but there are also bad manager and they will take advantage of this. for those dumpers they either sell it because they need money or they sell it because the price is high then after that it gets lower everyday.
I completely disagree with this opinion, since given the fact that most ICO is a Scam, it is not worth presenting your data to them! Your data can be used, is it worth considering?!
Do you agree that Bounty needs KYC?
In my opinion only, I will agree with this policy to avoid multiple accounts or the use of other accounts in bounties. If it has this policy it will be fair to investors and to bounty participants. Scams can be reduced to a bounty. Dumpers can also be reduced.
What is your Opinion?
Free comment.
While it is obvious KYC is going to have some advantages, the disadvantages are simply too great, the whole point of cryptocurrencies was to avoid all of this bureaucratic processes, now that icos are doing the same a bank is doing then I have no interest to invest in them and I'm sure there are many users that think like that, so if icos want to do that they can keep their useless tokens for themselves. In my opinion only, I will agree with this policy to avoid multiple accounts or the use of other accounts in bounties. If it has this policy it will be fair to investors and to bounty participants. Scams can be reduced to a bounty. Dumpers can also be reduced.
What is your Opinion?
Free comment.
Jump to: