Topic: Bounties required KYC. - page 8. (Read 3472 times)
I think that KYC should be if the amount invested exceeds at least $ 3k, but not for bounties. It's not worth taking risk with your documents, like a few dollars in a twitter campaign.
I agree to verify the identity for the bounty. Because there will be more fraud with more than one account participating in the campaign. They will receive more token than those who only use one account
I think that for participation in bounty companies need not undergo KYC, so as you give their data and in most cases for 10 dollars. In addition, there are a lot of scams in the crypto-currency market, if there were guarantees that the ICO in which you participate will not be a fraud, then maybe I would give my data, but still it is quite dangerous.
It seems to me that such checks are necessary to exclude the participation of scammers or bots. It is necessary to introduce this system for many projects.
I'm participate many bounty in which Some bounty are required bounty KYC for get token. Mostly kyc are required for token sale. So I agree the bounty need KYC for bounty token.
I like bounty like this but we need to see the value of the project first. With the existence of KYC, fake accounts will be eliminated and it means the total participants will not be as much as a bounty without KYC and the reward will be higher.
Do you agree that Bounty needs KYC?
In my opinion only, I will agree with this policy to avoid multiple accounts or the use of other accounts in bounties. If it has this policy it will be fair to investors and to bounty participants. Scams can be reduced to a bounty. Dumpers can also be reduced.
What is your Opinion?
Free comment.
In my opinion only, I will agree with this policy to avoid multiple accounts or the use of other accounts in bounties. If it has this policy it will be fair to investors and to bounty participants. Scams can be reduced to a bounty. Dumpers can also be reduced.
What is your Opinion?
Free comment.
This is something that should not be so unusual nowadays and is so necessary. Especially in recent years, the number of users who have used bounty campaigns badly has increased so much that the project teams are forced to use this defense. Of course it is not a perfect security measure, but we can say that it is a security measure enough to avoid income with multiple memberships. Authenticating for each project is not reliable either, so we need to be very careful with our users and give only our quality information to quality projects. We have also carried out a necessary activity such as conducting research in this way, and we are also informed about the project. Thus, we have a chance to keep ourselves away from simple projects indirectly.
Do you agree that Bounty needs KYC?
In my opinion only, I will agree with this policy to avoid multiple accounts or the use of other accounts in bounties. If it has this policy it will be fair to investors and to bounty participants. Scams can be reduced to a bounty. Dumpers can also be reduced.
What is your Opinion?
Free comment.
In my opinion only, I will agree with this policy to avoid multiple accounts or the use of other accounts in bounties. If it has this policy it will be fair to investors and to bounty participants. Scams can be reduced to a bounty. Dumpers can also be reduced.
What is your Opinion?
Free comment.
I don't mind KYC as long as it still fulfills the procedure, especially if the value of the tokens is large enough. whatever it is will always be risky in the crypto industry.
Do you agree that Bounty needs KYC?
In my opinion only, I will agree with this policy to avoid multiple accounts or the use of other accounts in bounties. If it has this policy it will be fair to investors and to bounty participants. Scams can be reduced to a bounty. Dumpers can also be reduced.
What is your Opinion?
Free comment.
Since bounties are required kyc just to secure that there participants are not using multiple acoounts but I totally disagree with that because KYC is not safe especially our identity there is a chance that it might be hacked and used it just to scam people. In my opinion only, I will agree with this policy to avoid multiple accounts or the use of other accounts in bounties. If it has this policy it will be fair to investors and to bounty participants. Scams can be reduced to a bounty. Dumpers can also be reduced.
What is your Opinion?
Free comment.
Do you agree that Bounty needs KYC?
In my opinion only, I will agree with this policy to avoid multiple accounts or the use of other accounts in bounties. If it has this policy it will be fair to investors and to bounty participants. Scams can be reduced to a bounty. Dumpers can also be reduced.
What is your Opinion?
Free comment.
Every ICO should have KYC since some people are using multiple accounts on participating the bounty campaign. It makes the bounty campaign fair and smooth to all bounty hunter but it is not always the case, there is terms and conditions while passing the KYC, ever wonder what they do after you passed the KYC? where do your ID copy will go, no one will know but them. In my opinion only, I will agree with this policy to avoid multiple accounts or the use of other accounts in bounties. If it has this policy it will be fair to investors and to bounty participants. Scams can be reduced to a bounty. Dumpers can also be reduced.
What is your Opinion?
Free comment.
now most of the bounties we do they require kyc and it is good in long term we can see genuine workers work for bounties it saves ico admins and bounties time and in bounty distribution
KYC will not reduce fraud in bounty campaigns. They will simply buy other people's documents, or they will take them from friends/family members. Do not go KYC - it's dangerous.
Of course I agree with this, but not with the complex KYC. For example, confirmation of identity with a video call is superfluous.
As for me, it is okay, but when they ask you to scan and upload national id (both sides) I send then right to hell together with their tokens. I agree to confir my identity, but sending them all the data seems to be insane to me.
Bounty campaigns on the one hand need some sort of control, KYC on the one hand can help, but not all people are ready to provide their documents for this, because there are many fraudulent projects and who knows for what needs they are using this confidential information in the future
I strongly agree that Bounty requires a KYC, this is the only way to succeed in a project that they expect in the future, where hired hunters cannot create multiple accounts to promote it so that it will be fair to investors and to give prizes to participants who do the work.
If the bounty task requires KYC to join, then this may limit many bounty hunters, and most bounty tasks require the propaganda effect of the project, they like more people to participate in the mission!
For me, projects with such verification are more credible, since this in most cases eliminates bots and scammers. After all, why should we share honestly earned marketing with such people?
This is really a strong one.
But for me, i would say that bounties with KYC would go a long way in reducing scammers and dumpers but i fear that it might reduce the spread of the project.
My opinion dough.
But for me, i would say that bounties with KYC would go a long way in reducing scammers and dumpers but i fear that it might reduce the spread of the project.
My opinion dough.
I think some persons would rather participate in bounties with KYC only if they have a good payout. And right now due to the decrease in market, people would rather not o for the bounties with KYC rather than stick to the non KYC bounties.
Jump to: