I agree with you that the use of KCY by bounty hunters can control multiple accounts well when they participate in the bounty.
But some people think it is wrong to provide our personal information in this way.
Topic: Bounties required KYC. - page 7. (Read 3472 times)
Concerning the bounty, this is not a topic for 5 minutes of discussion, but the КУC is very, very useful thing for crypto currency, but everything is right to less copies, scammers, I fully agree with this)
I think that bounty needs KYC because some people use several accounts for taking part in campaigns, especially it actual for social media campaigns, but as far as I know in cases when KYC is required some bounty hunters use stranger passports and anyway get tokens. So I think that KYC is a good idea for bounties but it needs improvement
Do you agree that Bounty needs KYC?
In my opinion only, I will agree with this policy to avoid multiple accounts or the use of other accounts in bounties. If it has this policy it will be fair to investors and to bounty participants. Scams can be reduced to a bounty. Dumpers can also be reduced.
What is your Opinion?
Free comment.
As I know KYC( know your customer ) should be only for investor's who invested to the projects 10k usd higher to avoid money laundering activities, since this is a regulations to the government. So I do not agree with this rules because were only promoting to the projects. In my opinion only, I will agree with this policy to avoid multiple accounts or the use of other accounts in bounties. If it has this policy it will be fair to investors and to bounty participants. Scams can be reduced to a bounty. Dumpers can also be reduced.
What is your Opinion?
Free comment.
I'm basically against KYC. No one knows whether the project is true or fraudulent at the beginning and at the end of the project. Our personal data from Photo scammers can themselves use to pass KYC. If participants follow the rules of bounty campaigning, why should they be identified? To use the participants' data for further fake KYC? I'm against KYC.
Of course, I have a distrust of the KYC procedure in the bounty, such as this is done to protect against scammers. The main thing that unexpectedly did not demand KYC in the middle or at the end of the company, it is necessary to specify at once.
No, I do not agree with this at all, because bounty members do not invest their money. They are not investors, and these requirements do not spread over them.
It seems to me that KYC does not always help to remove people with several accounts, because the passport data can be found or bought!
Yes it is good in a sense that it will avoid multiple or spam accounts participating in the bounty. This will filter and limit spamming in order for the real user who join the bounty will be rewarded. The negative side is that user or people who join the bounty campaign will not have the right the privacy of their accounts.
I do not agree with the fact that the bounty participants are invited to pass KYC. This will not save you from fraud - on the contrary. In free access to all who are horrible will be known personal data from the photo. And these personal data can be used by various scammers that are related to the "good" ICO, which makes KYC pass.
Bounties required KYC is a tactic of the greedy project party. To know that ico is illegal in some countries, KYC of bounty hunters in those countries cannot be passed, so project side can save a lot of payment, it is a shameless act.
Some of the bounties required KYC, maybe because some of the bounties consider all the bounty hunters as an investors. But if some bounty hunters really don't want KYC, then they should choose the bounty that doesn't required KYC.
I strongly disagree with KYC for hunters, for KYC investors there is a kind of insurance, and for the participants of bounty companies this is unacceptable, hunters do not invest in projects,but participate in advertising projects and receive bonuses.
I'll tell you so I fully support the passage of KYC for bounty companies, well, in the first place it will screen out a large number of multi-accounts, which in turn will reduce the number of participants and increase the pool of rewards
It is obvious overtime that some participants usually use multiple accounts in doing their bounty, this act of violating the bounty rules has caused a repetition of same content in various accounts and negates originality.
Therefore, in a bid to avoid this nonchalant attitude exhibited by participants, the Know Your Customer Policy (KYC) should be a necessity in other to track these defaulters.
Therefore, in a bid to avoid this nonchalant attitude exhibited by participants, the Know Your Customer Policy (KYC) should be a necessity in other to track these defaulters.
I don't see it as issue if hunters are told at the start of the campaign not telling them at the end of it.
I also agree if the bounty must be kyc, so it can minimize spam and can make bounty hunters really work hard so they get lots of bonuses for bounty hunters
Are the campaign manager going to keep the documents?
I have already submitted some documents to exchanges and to some campaigns that asks KYC. I don't see any problem but I hope to get out of it whenever something comes up. Sooner the government owned exchange perhaps will soon arise, they sure will be asking for KYC too.
yes I strongly agree that Bounty requires KYC, the first for bounty hunters can not make many accounts, because they want to get lots of tokens after the project period is up, with the kyc it will be fair for investors and to give prizes to participants.
I think bounties dont need to do a kyc because we not an investor. We just helped the project to succesfull in crowdsale, i never do bounty for kyc because my id it's nor worth'ed to be shared.
Jump to: