Topic: Bounty and too many participants - page 14. (Read 10499 times)
I advise you not to waste time on the bounty, where there are many participants. You will get few coins. I advise you to look for a bounty with a small number of participants.
It is worth choosing companies with a limited number of participants, the bounty is becoming more popular every day, from this you can not escape, and thanks to Merit, on the forum doesn't earn much those below the Full member
yes any bounty that has much people on it doing it is a good bounty and is what doing despite the people following the bounty is much the manager will now have to share the coin reach every one that participated.
For now there is still many ico around.but my prediction in next 6 months the number of ico will decrees so much since so many ico failed these days.also so less investor that still interesting with ico.
Imagine..with less ico and huge participant,stakes will decrease so much.and maybe someday bounty will become worthless.
Imagine..with less ico and huge participant,stakes will decrease so much.and maybe someday bounty will become worthless.
We can not avoid that the bounty participants will grow in numbers since this forum is international and every member in this forum have family and friends that they will share this forum. Let us wait I think the regulation will come soon.
Bounty participants are more because of many ICO's are coming in on a daily basis. I think Bounty participants for social media is actually high as you said but that is the requirement of the bounty, the more they spread about their project the more they attract investors. We cannot limit the social media campaign participants for the sake of getting more pay I think.
Now that the requirements for rewarding activities have become more and more stringent, and the benefits it can bring to us are also decreasing, it is very rare that we now want to obtain lucrative returns.
I agree that there’s such a problem but can’t imagine there would be some strict rules letting only chosen ones participate ,it would be unfair to many people willing to take part.The only decision is just to limit number of participants for each campaign,so it would be a good motivation for people to go through registration untill this bounty gains enough participants.And it would be fair for everyone.
That's just part of the market. The more people that the bounty attracts the less you're going to get. If it's because the coin is very valuable then you're still going to get a good amount. The value drives the demand.
Bounty participants are increasingly increasing, this may indeed affect the reduction of bounty allocations that we should be able to get. However, with the growing number of participants, this makes bounty more and more support, so that more bounty will be created. With the many bounties created, it will be more options to be followed by the participants. I hope crypto can have an application to filter the scam ICO, so that who can be registered in the bounty is only a legitimate ICO. That way the crypto will not be colonized again by the scam ICO makers.
I've been talked about this long time a go with my friends, about how bounties need to set a limit of participants especially in their social media campaigns. When there are thousand of hunters signed for twitter & fb campaign, well dont you ever expect a huge rewards then. Im agree with the limitation in participants number in order to gain more rewards for bounty hunters.. Worked for 8-10 weeks and ended up with $8-$10 reward isn't something we would hope for
As more people participate in the bounty activities, its requirements are more stringent and the benefits it can bring to us are diminishing. But if you can find good projects it will bring you a lot of wealth, so more research projects are very necessary.
everything changes in life, the campaigns have changed, the conditions have changed .... Many people learned about the crypt and the bounty
I think that this is not a problem. The number of new projects is increasing every year. The number of participants is also growing. Do not worry about it.
Yes, now bounties are very popular. And many people participate in the bounty. It seems to me now is worth participating in a prospective bounty where few participants.
Now there are very few good campaigns in which there are few participants. In my opinion, if there are too few participants, then this is a bad sign. This means that people do not trust the campaign. Last year i got good amounts. At the moment thereare thousands of participants with multiple fake accounta and i prefer to invest instead of bounties.
There are many bounties that arise now and too many participants also, I don't know how to check the participants if its legit or not. But the thing is, too many participants will become too little tokens that we get after the end of the bounty.
Hello community!
What do you think about popularity of the bounty campaigns? I see many new participants joining bounty campaigns, especially Twitter and Facebook. With more and more new participants, we will earn less and less rewards, also many of potential buyers would rather join bounty campaign than invest to ICO - again less rewards for bounty participants.
I hope that we will see some regulations here and bounty campaigns be more strict in rules and they will choose only the best participants.
So, what is your opinion, guys?
What do you think about popularity of the bounty campaigns? I see many new participants joining bounty campaigns, especially Twitter and Facebook. With more and more new participants, we will earn less and less rewards, also many of potential buyers would rather join bounty campaign than invest to ICO - again less rewards for bounty participants.
I hope that we will see some regulations here and bounty campaigns be more strict in rules and they will choose only the best participants.
So, what is your opinion, guys?
yes, too many participants contributing real value of work at the moment. Mostly now the bounty particpants are just slackers who doing copy paste/rephrase and other things that requires lowest efforts. I don't know whether bounty is worth it anymore
Yes, now bounties are very popular. And many people participate in the bounty. It seems to me now is worth participating in a prospective bounty where few participants.
Hello community!
What do you think about popularity of the bounty campaigns? I see many new participants joining bounty campaigns, especially Twitter and Facebook. With more and more new participants, we will earn less and less rewards, also many of potential buyers would rather join bounty campaign than invest to ICO - again less rewards for bounty participants.
I hope that we will see some regulations here and bounty campaigns be more strict in rules and they will choose only the best participants.
So, what is your opinion, guys?
I think there's should be a participants limit in bounty campaign so that bounty hunters will focus and avoid to be kick by the campaign in short they have to take serious works. And as of that bounty hunters will make a greater compensation when it's over. Because if the campaign are too crowded then the given allocation for the bounty campaign divided into small parts. Then in that matter whose bounty hunters that will last long in this case? What do you think about popularity of the bounty campaigns? I see many new participants joining bounty campaigns, especially Twitter and Facebook. With more and more new participants, we will earn less and less rewards, also many of potential buyers would rather join bounty campaign than invest to ICO - again less rewards for bounty participants.
I hope that we will see some regulations here and bounty campaigns be more strict in rules and they will choose only the best participants.
So, what is your opinion, guys?
of course, there are generous companies that limit participants, but for me it is not a problem because now every day there are many companies, and many are not very aware of cryptography and do not understand until the end of everything.
Jump to: