Topic: Bounty and too many participants - page 9. (Read 10492 times)
More participants is a problem. But do not forget that even in this situation, we must work conscientiously to make a profit.
Well as one of thousands who are also joining in any bounty campaigns.
Majority here are also expecting to earn more 💰 money so the best way to do is to reduce the participants by making a rules that can limit the no.of participant.
Even with thousands of Bounty participants wanting to get a reward for their work it doesn't mean that the price of the reward is going to be small. Majority here are also expecting to earn more 💰 money so the best way to do is to reduce the participants by making a rules that can limit the no.of participant.
it's not good for us when there are a lot of participants in the company's bounty and especially in the company of signatures. and investors as they were and will be and less of them will not be because it is a faster payroll.
Well as one of thousands who are also joining in any bounty campaigns.
Majority here are also expecting to earn more 💰 money so the best way to do is to reduce the participants by making a rules that can limit the no.of participant.
Majority here are also expecting to earn more 💰 money so the best way to do is to reduce the participants by making a rules that can limit the no.of participant.
find increase not only the number of people participating in the bounty, but also the number of bounty themselves. every day there are more and more projects that allow a huge number of people to earn money. it's beautiful .if earlier only people who have been doing it for a long time and understand it perfectly could earn, now there are more chances for beginners.
Yes, the number of bounties increases, but the number of good bounties does not increase proportionally. This is a serious problem at the moment. 
following the bounty campaign is very profitable because it can get the token and then can use it to trade or sell it for our needs but the tokens that we get depends on the number of participants from bounty, the more participants then the tokens that we can also be less
Some social networks have already ceased to be so profitable and participate in them do not see the point, it is due to the fact that there are very simple conditions, well, to make retweet or repost much effort is not necessary, for this much will not be paid. Now the most lucrative, personally behaved, I allocate subscription companies, usually it is allocated the most tokens and the system of rates allows to earn so well. Another subscription does not exceed 300 participants, which pleases.
There's nothing you can do about it. When people hear stories about earnings in the bounty, they also want to repeat it.
That is an extreme one; it's unquestionably an early appropriation display for benefit, yet what kind of directions can be set up? How might you characterize the "Best" members? Likely any framework would just make it reasonable for long haul members/individuals from some gathering and just serve to dishearten any individual who is simply entering the network.
find increase not only the number of people participating in the bounty, but also the number of bounty themselves. every day there are more and more projects that allow a huge number of people to earn money. it's beautiful .if earlier only people who have been doing it for a long time and understand it perfectly could earn, now there are more chances for beginners.
Now it's harder to find a good bounty with few participants. I think it will soon be very difficult to make money on the bounty.
I have also started taking part in several campaigns. When doing some math calculations of my shares I am really disappointed when there are too many involved. But okay, I will increase the number of campaigns! Good luck.
I'd prefer to participate in those bounties where the number of participants is limited and rewards are calculated in token and not in stakes like it was in IndaHASH bounty. In such case you'll always know your rewards beforehand. Though nowadays it's very diffecult to find such bounty.
We must consider the activity of bounty hunter that we do not win free rewards, we invest time and knowledge and it is valuable.
The bounty hunter to win a reward does not invest fiat or crypto but if we 're invested in time, ability to write, followers, popularity. There we have to gather all the rules of the game to be able to participate and that is valuable too.
The bounty hunter must also quickly study the mission of a project (problems, solutions, viability, and transparency) to be able to give an opinion. I studied social media marketing and I can identify that bounty hunter activity allows building the social community by the passion of what they believe, they are also the first to support a product and spread the word in this case the ICO projects.
The bounty hunter to win a reward does not invest fiat or crypto but if we 're invested in time, ability to write, followers, popularity. There we have to gather all the rules of the game to be able to participate and that is valuable too.
The bounty hunter must also quickly study the mission of a project (problems, solutions, viability, and transparency) to be able to give an opinion. I studied social media marketing and I can identify that bounty hunter activity allows building the social community by the passion of what they believe, they are also the first to support a product and spread the word in this case the ICO projects.
many people want to get paid without working. for them, various bounty companies are the ideal means of earning. so now many companies are overheated due to the number of participants. but this is the main law of the market more demand more supply.
Actually all bounty campaigns must have a participant limit to provide a good reward for everyone. You might be better off reviewing campaigns and content because they need broad exposure, so that the campaign is well known and used. Campaigns are becoming more and more popular as it attracts many bounty hunters, as it is a good source of income for everyone.
it would be good for every bounty hunters if every campaign has a participant limit, but it allows bad things for the project with a few participants, this allows their projects not to be widely disseminatedOf course if a project does not reach its target it will be difficult for the bounty hunters to get the prizes they have
Actually all bounty campaigns must have a participant limit to provide a good reward for everyone. You might be better off reviewing campaigns and content because they need broad exposure, so that the campaign is well known and used. Campaigns are becoming more and more popular as it attracts many bounty hunters, as it is a good source of income for everyone.
Hello community!
What do you think about popularity of the bounty campaigns? I see many new participants joining bounty campaigns, especially Twitter and Facebook. With more and more new participants, we will earn less and less rewards, also many of potential buyers would rather join bounty campaign than invest to ICO - again less rewards for bounty participants.
I hope that we will see some regulations here and bounty campaigns be more strict in rules and they will choose only the best participants.
So, what is your opinion, guys?
What do you think about popularity of the bounty campaigns? I see many new participants joining bounty campaigns, especially Twitter and Facebook. With more and more new participants, we will earn less and less rewards, also many of potential buyers would rather join bounty campaign than invest to ICO - again less rewards for bounty participants.
I hope that we will see some regulations here and bounty campaigns be more strict in rules and they will choose only the best participants.
So, what is your opinion, guys?
For me it is already normal to have so many participants in twitter and facebook campaigns. What I do not like is signature campaign with so many participants and the application for signature campaign is still open for everybody. But I saw an improvement. There are bounties in altcoins that limits the number of participants especially with low ranks.
Now there are too many bounty people, and as the market goes down, earnings are getting worse and worse. Most projects are half dead.
Most of the bounties do not limit the number of participants. I think this is the most fundamental reason. If every bounty can limit the number of participants, then I think it can more evenly divide all participants into different bounties.
Jump to: