I think that this is not a big problem! There are many campaigns that are not very popular, so they do not have a lot of participants, which will allow you to earn more tokens
yup that is not a big problem cause bounties have allocated funds in every bounty, example the only tokens in signature is 750k tokens and the other is in the oher branch of bounties like facebook,twitter, and etc. if you really work hard for tat and you receive your tokens that is your prize and it doesn't mean that there's a lot participants in that certain campaign it doesn't mean that they divide the funds in equals. 
Topic: Bounty and too many participants - page 28. (Read 10505 times)
I'm sure it's not a problem for the marketers of ico. Of course, many of the participants are very good at promoting their brand, product. That is very important in the success of the ico campaign. In other words, many people join the bounty and I'm sure many of them invest in that ico. I was one of them.
well i have read this question or suggestion you may say many times in the past and no absolute answer comes to mind but, every new free lance work initially (in this case bounty hunting) has a heavy payoff which will reduce with growing time and it will saturate so people expecting previous payoffs should revise their expectation because too many people have realized the potential gain from bounty campaigns. Going with KYC might help but that raises doubts about privacy so there it goes. Everyone wants piece of that pie as they say.
I think that this is not a big problem! There are many campaigns that are not very popular, so they do not have a lot of participants, which will allow you to earn more tokens
Now i am doing the sparkster ico bounty. It is not really oversubscribed but preaty hard to do! Lot's of rules there. But who cares, the project is very good so i work hard too!
Your statment is true, however the number of icos and bounties have increased as well so one can participate in more bounties and if spread out payments could still be satisfactory. I find that there is still lots of room to make money from media bounties, translations and signatures. Twitter and facebook bounties always saturate and I never expect a high payment for those.
Hello community!
What do you think about popularity of the bounty campaigns? I see many new participants joining bounty campaigns, especially Twitter and Facebook. With more and more new participants, we will earn less and less rewards, also many of potential buyers would rather join bounty campaign than invest to ICO - again less rewards for bounty participants.
I hope that we will see some regulations here and bounty campaigns be more strict in rules and they will choose only the best participants.
So, what is your opinion, guys?
That would be a great idea however it's too dificult to implement since we don't have a specific standard to whom we can consider to call someone as a "best particpant". What do you think about popularity of the bounty campaigns? I see many new participants joining bounty campaigns, especially Twitter and Facebook. With more and more new participants, we will earn less and less rewards, also many of potential buyers would rather join bounty campaign than invest to ICO - again less rewards for bounty participants.
I hope that we will see some regulations here and bounty campaigns be more strict in rules and they will choose only the best participants.
So, what is your opinion, guys?
Hello community!
What do you think about popularity of the bounty campaigns? I see many new participants joining bounty campaigns, especially Twitter and Facebook. With more and more new participants, we will earn less and less rewards, also many of potential buyers would rather join bounty campaign than invest to ICO - again less rewards for bounty participants.
I hope that we will see some regulations here and bounty campaigns be more strict in rules and they will choose only the best participants.
So, what is your opinion, guys?
All reward activities must be limited by participants in order to provide a good reward for everyone. It's also a good idea to give the bounty hunter a rating for the project to choose the best fit for their company, but I can't imagine how it will work. What do you think about popularity of the bounty campaigns? I see many new participants joining bounty campaigns, especially Twitter and Facebook. With more and more new participants, we will earn less and less rewards, also many of potential buyers would rather join bounty campaign than invest to ICO - again less rewards for bounty participants.
I hope that we will see some regulations here and bounty campaigns be more strict in rules and they will choose only the best participants.
So, what is your opinion, guys?
I think bounty managers must limit the campaign participants, if there is a limit then there will not be many campaign participants. It is the best solution, for example, look at the amon bounty..
This is what we can see that if there is a bounty campaign it would be applied by so many participants in the different areas of campaign on which the ICO project is offerring for that certain projects
Joining Bounties with numerous members isn't bad they additionally searching for a decent bounties where they can ensure they get compensate despite the fact that its not big.We all observe more individuals joining bitcoin and everybody is buckling down so we ought not be stress of having less reward on the grounds that to numerous members as long as everybody is reasonable.
I think the most people saw the problem with to many bounty hunters per campaign. But you also see the bountymanager reacting. There many bounty campaign where you can just participate when you are at least member. I think the problem is with the multiply account with the jr members. The merits system stopped them a little bit.
Without the existence of bounty hunter, Of course,,, Any project as good. Any ICO concepts they bring will not get to investors. More and more the bounty hunters mean the world of crypto is widespread and the public participates.
It is good to crypto will be widespread and ICO will get many investors but not all ICO will be successful its outcome. Then bounty hunyer will only earn little because on many participants, rewards will be divided among all who joined.
Well we can not forbid people to not join a campaign but maybe the owners can reduce the number of the campaign joiners
Well I don't that this is good when bounty have too many participants. I liked bounty with limited participants and of course this is good to join signature, because you can join signature only one time. I saw a lot of social media companies have 3000 - 4000 participants! This is insane. You can earn 2-3$ top from these social companies
Each bounty quest has a limited number of people. No matter how many people increase, there will be no reward for more than the number of qualified people. I do not think that the increase in the number of people will have any impact on the benefits. I think that the quality of the bounty quest is the key to the current rewards. Many tasks are deceptive!
Right, a lot of people can register for a bounty, but they don't do anything, and they end up not getting steaks. But for projects, the more people spread information about the product, the better.
Hi, i don't know a lot but when there is too many participants, the bounty are less profitable, look in OAX bounty it is a good project and there in not so much participants
Companies are interested when there are a lot of participants. They are not very interested in how much we earn. They need to do a lot of advertising for some budget. The more advertising (participants), the more information about the project
Each bounty quest has a limited number of people. No matter how many people increase, there will be no reward for more than the number of qualified people. I do not think that the increase in the number of people will have any impact on the benefits. I think that the quality of the bounty quest is the key to the current rewards. Many tasks are deceptive!
Actually, there are bounty campaigns which limits their participants. Though it is not that big of a deal really. Investors would tend to invest and, can, at the same time join bounty. They know too well that if they do believe the project then it is better to throw your money than catching some free small money being partitioned in different campaigns to a lot of participants. Also, participants would tend to find another campaign if they think there are too many participants already so in other words it tends to limit themselves rather than implementing something to limit them.
It is true, we could also join on the campaign with a limit on participant for you to have a better opportunity to earn more tokens yet those campaign could be more strict on posting or even on the thread you could post. Yet, limits in participant could increased the token count per participant that could be trade in a much more higher price. Jump to: