Topic: Bounty and too many participants - page 29. (Read 10499 times)
this sound like Utopia, because as many guys told here already it is not useful for managers to cap the limits
I still believe in ICO rating because this is a good basing in terms of knowing if they are one of the trusted company and business in this industry to be able of part of them because they are the best.
More and more prize hunters mean the world of crypto is widespread and the community participates. I also do not think it's a problem because too many campaigns are popping up every day.
What's good about a signature campaign is that you can only do one campaign. There was certainly more willing, but ICO has become more, so you can earn here! But on Facebook and Twitter 3000 people make one campaign and of course each will get very little!
I think everything is fine with a bounty but there is a problem with facebook and twitter campaigns, there are too many participants in these campaigns now and most of them are fakes or bots, such accounts can't help the project, they're totally useless, and i think we need some changes to fix the problem with this type of bounty.
Hello community!
What do you think about popularity of the bounty campaigns? I see many new participants joining bounty campaigns, especially Twitter and Facebook. With more and more new participants, we will earn less and less rewards, also many of potential buyers would rather join bounty campaign than invest to ICO - again less rewards for bounty participants.
I hope that we will see some regulations here and bounty campaigns be more strict in rules and they will choose only the best participants.
So, what is your opinion, guys?
As a bounty participants and a late comers in this forum i am happy that there were ICOs that accepts low rank hunters ,in this case we may able to be inspired to work hard on it and to prove that not all late adoptors just made this community crowded with less knowledge hunter.We need to prove to everybody that we are dedicated on what we are doing and hoping everyone will never treat us as a trash in this forum. What do you think about popularity of the bounty campaigns? I see many new participants joining bounty campaigns, especially Twitter and Facebook. With more and more new participants, we will earn less and less rewards, also many of potential buyers would rather join bounty campaign than invest to ICO - again less rewards for bounty participants.
I hope that we will see some regulations here and bounty campaigns be more strict in rules and they will choose only the best participants.
So, what is your opinion, guys?
Most people in crypto are engaging from bounties because they heard it gives profit without an actual investment, just your time and effort to be consider as your investment in these medium. Too much participants would not be a nice idea for people who used to do bounties, because the reward might be divided into multiple depending on how much participants they have in a campaign.
Joining Bounties with many participants is not bad they also looking for a good bounties where they can make sure they get reward even though its not big.We all see more people joining bitcoin and everyone is working hard so we should not be worry of having less reward just because to many participants as long as everyone is fair. Theres a lot of bounties to join so no worries lets help everyone to be rich!
I think the campaign manager should limit the participants to ensure the bounty rewards. There are some projects that doesnt have a limitations and very open to all bounty hunters.
I have seen few bounties that have a particular limit of participants that can join their bounties. They just give you the number of participants they want and when you fall outside that range, you are rejected at once. It seems bounties of these nature are often taken seriously. But putting a linit to the number of participants also limits your advertisement.
I don't mind how many participants does a bounty campaign has. It means that the project is a good one. Though it is also good if few participants joined because the allocated budget among you is bigger.
Yes, this is without doubt an important topic. Many people out of it refuse to participate in popular projects and choose small projects but with a lot of money! In my opinion, it is better to participate in a project that has potential and can grow after entering the exchange!
Well more and more who follow the bounty campaign, because no need to spend capital. but it is not easy also because we have to be diligent to find other profitable projects, we can not rely on one project, but no problem it just takes hard work.
People have become so many that some managers have already begun to give up social bounties. Because one campaign is packed with 5000 participants and half of them are bots.
Bounty campaign is good if you do not have the money you can join, and it is better if you have investment, so much depends on the bounty.
The popularity of bounty all over the world has made marks in people's lives. Glad to know that despite others suspicion, still many people choose to join bounties for they know what it can bring to their lives and to others. It looks like you are worried about your personal profit in the bounty campaign. For the investor and the campaign itself, a large number of participants is the success of the project 
I agree with you, in bounty every day more and more people. (((((
It would be nice if there are any restrictions.
Yes, there are bounty campaigns that are completely crowded, in other words a lot of people are keep on joining; this one means, the campaign is popular and supported by many people. It would be nice if there are any restrictions.
I agree with you, in bounty every day more and more people. (((((
It would be nice if there are any restrictions.
It would be nice if there are any restrictions.
Yeah, there are too many participants in bounty programs of late. These make the rewards less instead of the normal huge rewards. Most bounty managers always select the best participant for a particular bounty and these do not affect the huge number of participant.
It is not a problem if a bounty have too many participants because the more participants the more advertisements of the project and it is the advantage of the project.
not only that the name of sustenance is already there are set, many at least that follow bounty is still we are grateful, because many who participate bounty also many results, as you say the ad can be obtained
There are campaigns full of participants, but nothing else, you just have to try to find the most profitable for each. Gifts are becoming more popular every day. I believe that the number will continue to increase.
Jump to: