It's actually good for the ICO, "too many participants" means that they will spread the ICO to a wider audience than when they are fewer participants or when it is restricted to a certain number of participants.
I agree that it's good for the ICO when there are a lot of participants, but then the participants receive $ 5-10 each for several months of work and this is very small. 
Topic: Bounty and too many participants - page 5. (Read 10492 times)
I try to participate in those bounties in which there are few participants. This is a good way to get more coins.
Every day the bounty is more and more popular and more people are participating in the bounty. Now it is difficult to find a good bounty where there are few participants.
Yes this years , too many people Know about bounty and too many people cheating in every bounty
article,telegram and socmed , that really bad ! now i never get huge payment from socmed bounty or article, just only for signature and youtube get huge payment!
but if rules in every bounty ,must Minimal Rank MEMBER to joined Bounty , not many will participate , that will better!
article,telegram and socmed , that really bad ! now i never get huge payment from socmed bounty or article, just only for signature and youtube get huge payment!
but if rules in every bounty ,must Minimal Rank MEMBER to joined Bounty , not many will participate , that will better!
I advise you to try to find promising companies and bounties with few participants. Now it does not make sense to participate in the bounty, where there are a lot of participants.
Well, people are getting aware of earnings in bounty and it's natural to see many of us participating.
It doesn't go backward.
It doesn't go backward.
It's actually good for the ICO, "too many participants" means that they will spread the ICO to a wider audience than when they are fewer participants or when it is restricted to a certain number of participants.
Hello community!
What do you think about popularity of the bounty campaigns? I see many new participants joining bounty campaigns, especially Twitter and Facebook. With more and more new participants, we will earn less and less rewards, also many of potential buyers would rather join bounty campaign than invest to ICO - again less rewards for bounty participants.
I hope that we will see some regulations here and bounty campaigns be more strict in rules and they will choose only the best participants.
So, what is your opinion, guys?
What do you think about popularity of the bounty campaigns? I see many new participants joining bounty campaigns, especially Twitter and Facebook. With more and more new participants, we will earn less and less rewards, also many of potential buyers would rather join bounty campaign than invest to ICO - again less rewards for bounty participants.
I hope that we will see some regulations here and bounty campaigns be more strict in rules and they will choose only the best participants.
So, what is your opinion, guys?
I agree, usually, with the stake system, more participants mean fewer earnings. Concerning to the social campaign, however, there's also the problem with people taking part with multiple accounts and bots...
Yes, I agree with you and I believe with this regulation, the rate of participating wilt multiple account will be reduced thereby reducing the rate of fraud and it will also help to reduce the crowd and there will be a limit to number of participant that will participate in the campaign.
Already, there is a bounty with a limited number of participants. Yes, such bounties are few now, but I think in the future such bounties will be much more.
There are managers who limit the number of participants. I advise you to participate in such bounty.
Especially those who are greedy enough to make bots and fake accounts just to get a lot of stakes.
My analysis saw me that manager fix all job correctly and cahnge rules to join and not all participants still alive in final of bounty camp. Just keep providing valuable comments in the marketplace, it will come back to you in a nice way.
My analysis saw me that manager fix all job correctly and cahnge rules to join and not all participants still alive in final of bounty camp. Just keep providing valuable comments in the marketplace, it will come back to you in a nice way.
yes my friend strongly agree with you asking like this. karene now a lot of excessive ico in its participants then we hunters prizes for bounty programs Twitter or Facebook very few receive token rewards from their ico. is it better for bounty programs to limit participants to less participants in their bounty. I think it would be better in prizes of prize hunters.
Hello community!
What do you think about popularity of the bounty campaigns? I see many new participants joining bounty campaigns, especially Twitter and Facebook. With more and more new participants, we will earn less and less rewards, also many of potential buyers would rather join bounty campaign than invest to ICO - again less rewards for bounty participants.
I hope that we will see some regulations here and bounty campaigns be more strict in rules and they will choose only the best participants.
So, what is your opinion, guys?
What do you think about popularity of the bounty campaigns? I see many new participants joining bounty campaigns, especially Twitter and Facebook. With more and more new participants, we will earn less and less rewards, also many of potential buyers would rather join bounty campaign than invest to ICO - again less rewards for bounty participants.
I hope that we will see some regulations here and bounty campaigns be more strict in rules and they will choose only the best participants.
So, what is your opinion, guys?
You are right, there should be more control and greater restrictions to participate in the campaigns of Twitter and Facebook, because by distributing a bounty between a hundred and even thousands of participants can lead to a gradual loss of motivation to participate in those campaigns.
For example, a bag of $100,000 for 1500 participants on twitter would only leave a profit of about $13 for each individual, which is truly insignificant considering that usually those campaigns require many months of continuous work, and that in the long run tends to discourage participation.
Yes, now the bounty is very popular and many people participate in the bounty. Now it's harder to earn coins.
If you want to get a good profit, then I advise you just to find a promising company with few participants.
Everyone was told about their earnings on each forum or youtube. You need to be silent if you have a good income. But most people do not understand this. Perhaps this course will positively affect the bounty of the campaign and significantly increase their effectiveness. Most of the participants who only use facebook and twitter may have to join the forum if they want to earn coins.
if now participate very much and new accounts always follow like newbie also participate in social media campaigns, the number of participants better in the limit because now the gift of income is getting smaller. and now we have to work hard for big prizes. if my suggestion mending limited number of bounty participants.
I advise you to find a bounty where there is a limit on the number of participants. I think this is the best option.
That's true , everyday bounty campaigns attract more and more participants . Bounties becomes a whole industry nowadays , but I think campaigns must tougher their participants limits , because with growing number of participants , the salary of bounty hunters tends to zero.
Actually there are various bounty programs have limits to their participants. High standards are given to applicants who wish to participate in different campaign. So it's not easy for new ones to get involved. But now more members prefer to join in different campaign to earn profit, rather than investing or trade different currency. I think this will not be a problem , because there are so many bounties out there. You just have to look those bounty that have a good ICOs to their members.
Jump to: