I agree changing the rules is an example of contract violations. Some project say in rules, manager or team can change everything in the first thread. This is like talking twice. He say not required kyc but if he change it doesn't violate the rules, because change is also in the rules
There are really some instances wherein before the campaign ends the bounty manager changes its rule and its alright because he has the right to change the rules without prior notice. But if they change the rewards intended for the bounty hunters, that's i think is deceiving the bounty hunters clearly. 
Topic: Bounty Campaigns deceiving hunters by changing rules? Read this! (Read 649 times)
I also believe that it is wrong to change the rules for participation in the bounty at the end of the program. The rules for the participation of a bounty must be clearly stated at the beginning of the bounty company and not changed at the end.
I think it was a great idea pointing this out for those who are not aware of this, the only thing i found disturbing is when it is written that "the team reserve the right to change rules of campaign at anytime" which directly means a campaign can decide to request for kyc from hunters in mid campaign or ending of campaign because of this rules,
I don't know if anything can be done after openly stating such rules.
Every company has the right to provide a policy that best suite them, it is just like when you apply for a job, and they give you offer letter stating all the policies that will bind you or the company, you have every right to reject the offer letter if you feel such binding policy is not favorable to you. I don't know if anything can be done after openly stating such rules.
This is the same way that we need to treat the situation here, participating in campaign is our choice to make, if we have read the policy binding that campaign and we are not comfortable with it, then we have every right to just ignore such campaign and look for campaigns that best suite out own interest, maybe if we can just stop being desperate about these campaigns, then and simply just take our time to carefully choose projects, things will probably just change.
I as a bounty hunter is also confused. Sometimes the rules are suddenly changed by the manager, but before that the regulations can also be changed at any time. Here I don't blame the manager. Because the Manager also follows instructions from the project team. If the regulations changed are certainly not a problem, but what I'm confused about is the regulation for KYC. At the beginning it is not said that a bounty hunter is needed KYC, suddenly at the end of the campaign the bounty hunter must do so to claim their prize. If not many people know this, they will lose what they should get. This is what makes me sad.
I agree changing the rules is an example of contract violations. Some project say in rules, manager or team can change everything in the first thread. This is like talking twice. He say not required kyc but if he change it doesn't violate the rules, because change is also in the rules
Since bounty participants now have such privilege and if cheating managers know about it, they will be afraid of cheating or taking any action that will cause the loss of their reputations, because all the cheated hunters will come into agreement to write against their actions.
I support the flag for the simple that they want all bounty hunters to claim their token, this practice has to be stopped from delaying bounty to doing KYC to locking the token, this practice must be stopped it's ok to change the rules but not in a way that bounty hunters will not get their token or will have a hard time claiming it.
The fact that Bounty Managers have the right to change the rules and regulations at any time doesn't mean it's convenient for bounty hunters. Most times, that act of changing rules always makes it difficult for hunters to claim thier tokens. To me, it's an act of cheating.
In my opinion, the manager who manages the bounty campaign has the right to change the rules of the campaign. as a bounty hunter must obey any changes made by the manager.
Great idea. How about the we change the rules in the end to say that all your work was charity and the manager doesn't have to pay you? Will you accept that and say that it was his right to do so? Managers can change the rules but only to some extent. They have their own responsibilities and you have yours.
The fact is that at the moment there are no clear rules for regulating the distribution of coins and as a result, the project team can act as it wants. There are also options for reducing the cost of project management - Bounty managers can use all sorts of tricks. You need to look for campaigns with reports and a fixed number of participants, otherwise, there is simply no point in wasting time.
Umbrella Token has a definitely 100% no KYC bounty program and decentralised IEO running on forkdelta, follow my links for ANN and further reading.
I think it was a great idea pointing this out for those who are not aware of this, the only thing i found disturbing is when it is written that "the team reserve the right to change rules of campaign at anytime" which directly means a campaign can decide to request for kyc from hunters in mid campaign or ending of campaign because of this rules,
I don't know if anything can be done after openly stating such rules.
That is what we are trying to address here. Hunters should still be paid for their work whether they can complete KYC or not. If companies refuse to pay in tokens, they could at least pay in eth or btc. Besides, KYC is common now and companies should have known that before they started a campaign. Why does it have to be at the end of the campaign before they consult their lawyers if KYC is required or not? I don't know if anything can be done after openly stating such rules.
I think it was a great idea pointing this out for those who are not aware of this, the only thing i found disturbing is when it is written that "the team reserve the right to change rules of campaign at anytime" which directly means a campaign can decide to request for kyc from hunters in mid campaign or ending of campaign because of this rules,
I don't know if anything can be done after openly stating such rules.
yes, it is indeed unpleasant, and it sounds inclined to them not to appreciate the work of the bounty hunter. they campaigned with the rules they made and it turned out they changed it themselves. isn't that very unpleasant. even though now we all know that, and understand that. I don't know if anything can be done after openly stating such rules.
I think it was a great idea pointing this out for those who are not aware of this, the only thing i found disturbing is when it is written that "the team reserve the right to change rules of campaign at anytime" which directly means a campaign can decide to request for kyc from hunters in mid campaign or ending of campaign because of this rules,
I don't know if anything can be done after openly stating such rules.
I don't know if anything can be done after openly stating such rules.
In my opinion, the manager who manages the bounty campaign has the right to change the rules of the campaign. as a bounty hunter must obey any changes made by the manager.
Great idea. How about the we change the rules in the end to say that all your work was charity and the manager doesn't have to pay you? Will you accept that and say that it was his right to do so? Managers can change the rules but only to some extent. They have their own responsibilities and you have yours.
I understand how most bounty hunters feel whennit comes to changing bounty rules at the end of bounty campaigns and what I do ask most bounty hunters is, do they really read bounty rules before starting it? If not, then they should start doing so because most bounty managers indicates that the bounty rules are subject to change and if it does happen that way, we should just accept because we were told before.
Now there are frequent cases when a project initially writes one thing, and when it comes time to pay coins to bounty hunters, the project drastically changes the conditions and begins to demand something.
I am not a lawyer but I think changing rules at the end of the campaign like suddenly requiring KYC before you can get your reward is an example of contract violations.
I know a campaign that using the same method, my friend joined the campaign last year as a signature campaign member. And maybe you've heard about it, it called Adab.They seem suspicious to me, you can do your research on this if you want to. Like you said, they changed the rules at the end of the campaign.
I know a campaign that using the same method, my friend joined the campaign last year as a signature campaign member. And maybe you've heard about it, it called Adab.They seem suspicious to me, you can do your research on this if you want to. Like you said, they changed the rules at the end of the campaign.
I'm afraid nothing can be done on past campaigns. I created this thread for current and future campaigns and to inform hunters, who often complains, that they can do something about it if they can prove that damage has been done from campaign rule changes.In my opinion, the manager who manages the bounty campaign has the right to change the rules of the campaign. as a bounty hunter must obey any changes made by the manager.
I hope I don't see you complain in the future.
very good if there is a bounty like that, but in my opinion the Terragreen case can still be forgiven because the project that does not pay the bounty is the most outrageous and when there are no bounty-like flag systems like that, this can be used as a new project that bounties don't change the rules arbitrarily it is better to be clear at the beginning even though it is quiet compared to the project it hates at the end of the campaign.
yes useful information, tired already cheat as they want,
I had a case, after the end of the bounty, they closed the telegram bounty, and the general group,
and then it turned out that their token went to his blockchain, and gave a week to replace the address,
they unsubscribed in the BTT stream,
I went several times and didn’t pay attention, I immediately went to the telegram link, and there nothing works,
thus left without tokens.
I had a case, after the end of the bounty, they closed the telegram bounty, and the general group,
and then it turned out that their token went to his blockchain, and gave a week to replace the address,
they unsubscribed in the BTT stream,
I went several times and didn’t pay attention, I immediately went to the telegram link, and there nothing works,
thus left without tokens.
Jump to: