Pages:
Author

Topic: Bounty Campaigns now trial and error method (Read 844 times)

full member
Activity: 882
Merit: 126
★777Coin.com★ Fun BTC Casino!
January 24, 2020, 12:08:58 PM
#88
Hi All,

This is not about scam projects. This is about the projects which fail to raise enough funds due to what so ever reasons. When bounty hunters work for weeks and at the last moment project announces that they can no longer run it due to insufficient funds raised, its nothing but a waste of time and energy for us.
In my opinion, should project teams have enough fundings before they look for investors? What is called MVP is very important for the users to check for before investing.
MVP will ensure that even if funds are not raised as expected, it can be delayed but not dead.
From your point of view, what other points are there which projects and investors both look for?
Hunters available for the project to hire without paying any money initially show bounty projects taking advantage of this made bounty campaigns look uncertainty most of the time. So bounty hunters actually need to be e changed before asking about it team about their behaviour while running bounty campaigns.
hero member
Activity: 1232
Merit: 503
Investor confidence has faded with the promise of a large project, which is why the bounty is not as good as before.
ICO or IEO are no longer in demand unless the project already has a large company behind it.
The confidence faded a long time ago because most of the ICO is just a scam, promising big things but no commitment updating or expanding the project at all. There were certain times ICO was hot which was way before and the recent craze was IEO but it still didn't result into anything positive, i think crypto investors should just invest in STO rather than ICO/IEO because of the government regulation.
member
Activity: 784
Merit: 21
Whether good or bad, tiresome or discouraging I will still keep hunting as a bounty hunter, the fact about bounties is you can never tell what will happen and i'm not ready to wait around, with my research and my persistence spirit i will hit the jackpot one day
legendary
Activity: 1960
Merit: 1026
Hi All,

This is not about scam projects. This is about the projects which fail to raise enough funds due to what so ever reasons. When bounty hunters work for weeks and at the last moment project announces that they can no longer run it due to insufficient funds raised, its nothing but a waste of time and energy for us.
In my opinion, should project teams have enough fundings before they look for investors? What is called MVP is very important for the users to check for before investing.
MVP will ensure that even if funds are not raised as expected, it can be delayed but not dead.
From your point of view, what other points are there which projects and investors both look for?

i think at first you must ask about that because for me i will ask about this so incase that the project does not raise enough funds then they will refund the investor money.
then i will leave the project but if the project says that he will continue no matter how much it's raised during the ICO then i will join it.
sr. member
Activity: 1876
Merit: 259
Investor confidence has faded with the promise of a large project, which is why the bounty is not as good as before.
ICO or IEO are no longer in demand unless the project already has a large company behind it.
legendary
Activity: 1568
Merit: 1002
They better raise funds privately and and when they have  the platform set up and coin already in the market, that would be the time that they can do bounty campaign for awareness, like what Emirex is doing right now, they are already in the market and they are doing bounty campaign and referrals contest.

sounds good  but why not all can do this   ? maybe its not simple to do  . its hard to get discovered or sell your products if you wont market it   .and whats the purpose of marketing if they were already succesful because they already got alot of investors  and the coin is already listed  ?  this is why most projects do bounty first or wont do bounty anymore   . trial and error indeed for the hunters  if they want to  gain a valueale coin thru bounty  .

In essence, having a large amount of funds at the beginning is the most important thing that developers must have, no problem they don't immediately list their tokens on the exchange because when they have large funds at the beginning it would be better to conduct or make a campaign that pays with bitcoin or even ethereum, then so that the marketing they make will be better if compared to them trying to find funds through investors by conducting campaigns
hero member
Activity: 1820
Merit: 537
Hi All,

This is not about scam projects. This is about the projects which fail to raise enough funds due to what so ever reasons. When bounty hunters work for weeks and at the last moment project announces that they can no longer run it due to insufficient funds raised, its nothing but a waste of time and energy for us.
In my opinion, should project teams have enough fundings before they look for investors? What is called MVP is very important for the users to check for before investing.
MVP will ensure that even if funds are not raised as expected, it can be delayed but not dead.
From your point of view, what other points are there which projects and investors both look for?
For me we can't assure the amount because considerably if the project failed to raise their minimum cap it is considered a failure unles like the other project who failed but they raised a good amount they still continue to pay the bounty as far as i know in the past.
The funds for the bounty is not necessary because if they have a peronal funds they will use it for advertisement and promotions and for the bounty hunters or the participants will look for success of the particular project .We need to be wise in picking or choosing a biunty that have a huge or big chance of becoming successful
legendary
Activity: 3416
Merit: 1225
Enjoy 500% bonus + 70 FS
Hi All,

This is not about scam projects. This is about the projects which fail to raise enough funds due to what so ever reasons. When bounty hunters work for weeks and at the last moment project announces that they can no longer run it due to insufficient funds raised, its nothing but a waste of time and energy for us.
In my opinion, should project teams have enough fundings before they look for investors? What is called MVP is very important for the users to check for before investing.
MVP will ensure that even if funds are not raised as expected, it can be delayed but not dead.
From your point of view, what other points are there which projects and investors both look for?

That should be the case for new projects now that wants public funds, but unfortunately, majority of ICO IEO and STO now wants to do crowdfunding in zero out of the pocket, everything is just lip service and they don't want to invest their own money they only invest in website, host and hire freelancers to launch their announcement, that will only cost $1000 maximum.
full member
Activity: 1750
Merit: 118
They better raise funds privately and and when they have  the platform set up and coin already in the market, that would be the time that they can do bounty campaign for awareness, like what Emirex is doing right now, they are already in the market and they are doing bounty campaign and referrals contest.

sounds good  but why not all can do this   ? maybe its not simple to do  . its hard to get discovered or sell your products if you wont market it   .and whats the purpose of marketing if they were already succesful because they already got alot of investors  and the coin is already listed  ?  this is why most projects do bounty first or wont do bounty anymore   . trial and error indeed for the hunters  if they want to  gain a valueale coin thru bounty  .
hero member
Activity: 2926
Merit: 567
Hi All,

This is not about scam projects. This is about the projects which fail to raise enough funds due to what so ever reasons. When bounty hunters work for weeks and at the last moment project announces that they can no longer run it due to insufficient funds raised, its nothing but a waste of time and energy for us.
In my opinion, should project teams have enough fundings before they look for investors? What is called MVP is very important for the users to check for before investing.
MVP will ensure that even if funds are not raised as expected, it can be delayed but not dead.
From your point of view, what other points are there which projects and investors both look for?

They better raise funds privately and and when they have  the platform set up and coin already in the market, that would be the time that they can do bounty campaign for awareness, like what Emirex is doing right now, they are already in the market and they are doing bounty campaign and referrals contest.
member
Activity: 504
Merit: 25
If you decide to join bounties just have it at the back of your mind that you might never get anything out of it and its better not to stop working on other bounty projects because if you rely on one project and it failed you just wasted your time, so to at least get something to safe your time try to join many other bounties too
sr. member
Activity: 2030
Merit: 269
Anything and everything about ICO bounty are all bad, when I was active I have compiled a long list of Shitcoins and they are still coming some of them I did not remember because they are sending my rewards after more than a year, some of the coins/tokens I expected to get did not arrive in my wallet, after the bounty campaign it's hard to keep up monitoring them because they delay the distribution or listing in the market.
legendary
Activity: 2394
Merit: 1131

Why not? I consider joining this project as I can see the use case the may help the community not just the crypto space. That is what crypto for as well right? Adaption would one. But can you tell me, what are those things to consider?
There are few things which you should consider before you joined on altcoin campaign/bounty. Make sure the bounty allocation isn't too high and for better result, join in bounty which in escrow.
hero member
Activity: 3010
Merit: 794
It’s good to look for a project with the right team or partnerships, though sometimes these are hard to come by and some of them can still do a good job but just needs the opportunity to prove themselves, but the right team and partnership is a good start.

I have seen various projects that kicked off really good but coming to end they turned to something else and disappointed their investors. Even scam projects there are lots of these days that pretends to be legit and very good, everything about them will look so good and will deceive the investors and as time goes on they show their true selves.
There are actually some good projects with good and legit team or devs but they do still destined to end up on failure.Why? They havent able to get sufficient support or funding

and instead those scammy ones had been funded for millions of dollars instead on the legit one.Finding a good project wont really be that easy and as of todays situation in regards of bounty
hunting where people do already lost up too much trust and we have seen that IEO is the new trend.Even how hard you do make that trial and error method, i would say it wont
really be that worth for your time.
jr. member
Activity: 113
Merit: 2
A very good idea. But most of the projects have a capital investment, they reward very little. As for the projects that raise capital IEO are almost not called on this market
legendary
Activity: 1568
Merit: 1002
i'm sure when the project has enough funds then at least they will run a bounty campaign or anything with payments using bitcoin or other coins that have been popular in the market, that is a very good reason to prove a project has funds and not just build a trial and error project
sr. member
Activity: 2660
Merit: 339
It’s good to look for a project with the right team or partnerships, though sometimes these are hard to come by and some of them can still do a good job but just needs the opportunity to prove themselves, but the right team and partnership is a good start.

I have seen various projects that kicked off really good but coming to end they turned to something else and disappointed their investors. Even scam projects there are lots of these days that pretends to be legit and very good, everything about them will look so good and will deceive the investors and as time goes on they show their true selves.
member
Activity: 742
Merit: 16
I like short term bounties because they always round things up very fast unlike 8weeks bounties, the second thing to watch for is bounty allocations, it's better to promote projects that want to pay 50k nowadays than those that promise 500k rewards, honestly in this type if market it's not real
sr. member
Activity: 1077
Merit: 250
CryptoTalk.Org - Get Paid for every Post!
Hi All,

This is not about scam projects. This is about the projects which fail to raise enough funds due to what so ever reasons. When bounty hunters work for weeks and at the last moment project announces that they can no longer run it due to insufficient funds raised, its nothing but a waste of time and energy for us.
In my opinion, should project teams have enough fundings before they look for investors? What is called MVP is very important for the users to check for before investing.
MVP will ensure that even if funds are not raised as expected, it can be delayed but not dead.
From your point of view, what other points are there which projects and investors both look for?
unfortunatelly, most of dev just wanna steal investors money. devs often dont care what product which will be given
so, MVP isnt given at the first, although there are many projects have been given by investors

in others side, built MVP also need money, no matter how small it is. and the money is got from investment
so, the project must get investment first then devs can develop the product itself
hero member
Activity: 2492
Merit: 542
In my opinion, should project teams have enough fundings before they look for investors? What is called MVP is very important for the users to check for before investing.
Yes this is correct but most of the projects collect money first before creating an MVP being greedy is the main reason they did not want to pursue project if theres no money first, the bad thing is they want to collect millions of dollars but in reality they will only spend much little compared to the stated soft cap and about joining bounty do not join those project with no exhanger yet if you dont want to waste our time and effort. 
Pages:
Jump to: