Choose wisely and don't just joined any campaign that being announce in the bounty section. Don't be like those bot-like users that are joining all bounty program specially the social media bounties.
It always pays to read their ANN thread, if you see a tons of newbies spamming a thread then its an indicator that the ICO project owner hired paid bump bots and only SCAM project do this kind of spam activity.
Topic: Bounty Campaigns now trial and error method - page 4. (Read 839 times)
Not really a trial and error method but I must say that we should always pick the best quality of a project. Most bounty hunter prefers quantity over quality because they didnt knew what project will succeed or give them profit. I do the opposite, I prefer quality over quantity. Even I only do one bounties, it doesnt matter as long as that I believe in that project will succeed.
What you say is true that the quality of a project is better than the quantity. But for the time being I find it difficult to find good projects and also because we know that in the past year many projects ended in failure due to scammers or softcap not being achieved, I think this has an impact on projects that have good quality and maybe the project should have their own funds to be able to develop the project because I think at this time it will be difficult to attract investors.
There will not be bounty campaign if the project has a lot of money at least they have fund for promoting stuff. IEO/ICO is the way for some project to raise funds in order to their project can be run correctly.
Maybe you need to try to join signature campaign which paid in bitcoin. Because this kind of project will be have the fund first and they use this forum to promote their project. Indeed, it will be difficult for bounty hunter if they are try to promote the project that can't paid them. And I think you should be familiar with this thing especially when you try to promote a project through bounty campaign.
Maybe you need to try to join signature campaign which paid in bitcoin. Because this kind of project will be have the fund first and they use this forum to promote their project. Indeed, it will be difficult for bounty hunter if they are try to promote the project that can't paid them. And I think you should be familiar with this thing especially when you try to promote a project through bounty campaign.
This is why everyone is afraid of working for them and they are finding harder for bounty stuff. Many people have fake twitter accounts that doesn't really mean anything, many of them got fake follows and eventually they are just charging the bounties for money that goes to nothing and they in return get nothing as well. I mean think about it, they deserve each other so well, there is this one twitter account with 15000 fake followers, whatever you share there goes unnoticed and doesn't help anyone, than there is this new coin coming up that will worth zero, so the coin owners give the zero worth worthless coin to people with fake followers who will do no good to them and they both end up with absolutely nothing.
Hi All,
This is not about scam projects. This is about the projects which fail to raise enough funds due to what so ever reasons. When bounty hunters work for weeks and at the last moment project announces that they can no longer run it due to insufficient funds raised, its nothing but a waste of time and energy for us.
In my opinion, should project teams have enough fundings before they look for investors? What is called MVP is very important for the users to check for before investing.
MVP will ensure that even if funds are not raised as expected, it can be delayed but not dead.
From your point of view, what other points are there which projects and investors both look for?
This is not about scam projects. This is about the projects which fail to raise enough funds due to what so ever reasons. When bounty hunters work for weeks and at the last moment project announces that they can no longer run it due to insufficient funds raised, its nothing but a waste of time and energy for us.
In my opinion, should project teams have enough fundings before they look for investors? What is called MVP is very important for the users to check for before investing.
MVP will ensure that even if funds are not raised as expected, it can be delayed but not dead.
From your point of view, what other points are there which projects and investors both look for?
The fact that the projects could not raise the required amount does not relieve them of responsibility to the participants of their platform. I have already watched many times how the project conducts fundraising through ICOs or IEOs and they all seem to be fine, but there is one thing, but they do not publish information about their current fundraising anywhere, which already cast doubt on their entire work. And as you noticed at the time of graduation, they suddenly remember that everything is bad with them. I think this is also a hoax. Indeed, there are a lot of factors for which a particular project is not worth our attention, and it is very bad that the admins of such projects themselves do not think about it. The main thing for investors and participants is to be honest with them.
Not really a trial and error method but I must say that we should always pick the best quality of a project. Most bounty hunter prefers quantity over quality because they didnt knew what project will succeed or give them profit. I do the opposite, I prefer quality over quantity. Even I only do one bounties, it doesnt matter as long as that I believe in that project will succeed.
What you say is true that the quality of a project is better than the quantity. But for the time being I find it difficult to find good projects and also because we know that in the past year many projects ended in failure due to scammers or softcap not being achieved, I think this has an impact on projects that have good quality and maybe the project should have their own funds to be able to develop the project because I think at this time it will be difficult to attract investors.Hi All,
This is not about scam projects. This is about the projects which fail to raise enough funds due to what so ever reasons. When bounty hunters work for weeks and at the last moment project announces that they can no longer run it due to insufficient funds raised, its nothing but a waste of time and energy for us.
In my opinion, should project teams have enough fundings before they look for investors? What is called MVP is very important for the users to check for before investing.
MVP will ensure that even if funds are not raised as expected, it can be delayed but not dead.
From your point of view, what other points are there which projects and investors both look for?
We know that MVP will help a project succeed or fail. But very few projects have an MVP before launching an ICO or an IEO, because those projects do not have any budget to implement their idea. So they need to call on investors through ICOs or IEOs, but unfortunately the current market is too boring and previous ICO projects have become scams. And it strongly impacts current new projects, investors are scared and do not dare to invest in any new projects today. This is not about scam projects. This is about the projects which fail to raise enough funds due to what so ever reasons. When bounty hunters work for weeks and at the last moment project announces that they can no longer run it due to insufficient funds raised, its nothing but a waste of time and energy for us.
In my opinion, should project teams have enough fundings before they look for investors? What is called MVP is very important for the users to check for before investing.
MVP will ensure that even if funds are not raised as expected, it can be delayed but not dead.
From your point of view, what other points are there which projects and investors both look for?
legendary
Activity: 2716
Merit: 1102
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
many teams do this first, but that also doesn't guarantee the success of a project. Well, I think that's a pretty good idea, it's just that the expenses for the development have actually been done to hire teams, do lists for IEO, coin making, and so on. if they already have the funds, they can develop their project and sell the product when it's finished without looking for investors. but, investors are really needed for something like this.
All projects go on like this now. It's enough to just capitalize on ideas, raise funds, not reach targets, bounty hunters aren't paid for failing to raise funds. Things like this have often happened, even good projects that will be difficult to pay bounty hunter. If they don't get investors who invest in their projects.
Hi All,
This is not about scam projects. This is about the projects which fail to raise enough funds due to what so ever reasons. When bounty hunters work for weeks and at the last moment project announces that they can no longer run it due to insufficient funds raised, its nothing but a waste of time and energy for us.
In my opinion, should project teams have enough fundings before they look for investors? What is called MVP is very important for the users to check for before investing.
MVP will ensure that even if funds are not raised as expected, it can be delayed but not dead.
From your point of view, what other points are there which projects and investors both look for?
They should but if you are thinking about funding is the main point in the crypto development and it's a big wrong. When you are skilful and you can create a new idea, consensus, design or something else without needing a lot of money. Byteball has created DAG consensus which has already used by major coins like NANO and IOTA without need fundings from the investors. It has even created by a single developer. MVP is a very important thing. MVP will represent how much experience that already had by the developer and how good he was in developing the MVP and make it becomes useful. This is not about scam projects. This is about the projects which fail to raise enough funds due to what so ever reasons. When bounty hunters work for weeks and at the last moment project announces that they can no longer run it due to insufficient funds raised, its nothing but a waste of time and energy for us.
In my opinion, should project teams have enough fundings before they look for investors? What is called MVP is very important for the users to check for before investing.
MVP will ensure that even if funds are not raised as expected, it can be delayed but not dead.
From your point of view, what other points are there which projects and investors both look for?
the only thing that interests investors is profit. so now investors do not invest in new projects, because they know that now in 90 percent of cases new projects will bring only losses and no one can give any guarantees that the project will be successful or profitable. Now investors are waiting for the most secure way to invest in new projects.
How they will invest for such things that doesn't give them ROI, so it's really becoming hard nowadays to run a legit project as it's hard to attract users now due to the trauma from the past projects, scam projects, shitcoins, no ROI at all and the project's team doesn't care about investors.
the only thing that interests investors is profit. so now investors do not invest in new projects, because they know that now in 90 percent of cases new projects will bring only losses and no one can give any guarantees that the project will be successful or profitable. Now investors are waiting for the most secure way to invest in new projects.
I think we can consider that also a scam project. Why? In the first place, before you create a project, you have to know all the aspects of the project. You will put up a team that is credible and reliable enough to push through the project under any circumstances. A project that will really solve a problem. Being unprepared is an indication of a scam project which focus on funds and profits. They don't really have a plan. They have the roadmap and every part of that should be planned and executed carefully.
Hi All,
This is not about scam projects. This is about the projects which fail to raise enough funds due to what so ever reasons. When bounty hunters work for weeks and at the last moment project announces that they can no longer run it due to insufficient funds raised, its nothing but a waste of time and energy for us.
In my opinion, should project teams have enough fundings before they look for investors? What is called MVP is very important for the users to check for before investing.
MVP will ensure that even if funds are not raised as expected, it can be delayed but not dead.
From your point of view, what other points are there which projects and investors both look for?
The project teams are to be blame for their failure, many of them failed to do their own research about why many projects are failing and they end up listing on bad exchanges even after bounty hunters warned them not to use a particular exchange This is not about scam projects. This is about the projects which fail to raise enough funds due to what so ever reasons. When bounty hunters work for weeks and at the last moment project announces that they can no longer run it due to insufficient funds raised, its nothing but a waste of time and energy for us.
In my opinion, should project teams have enough fundings before they look for investors? What is called MVP is very important for the users to check for before investing.
MVP will ensure that even if funds are not raised as expected, it can be delayed but not dead.
From your point of view, what other points are there which projects and investors both look for?
Bounty and other marketing campaigns are all trial and error in my opinion since there are no sure fire strategy that can guarantee a successful ICO. From what I know, most serious projects now have their private funding already for the initial development of the project and some of them even have their MVP ready before they even launch their bounty campaign and public token sale.
From your point of view, what other points are there which projects and investors both look for?
The points to look for has been answered many times already but the way most people look at new projects now, the only way they would invest is when new projects will be listed on bigger exchanges (IEO). 
we shouldn't be joining a campaign of projects that isn't really doable and i think its best to accept only BTC from these teams to see how serious they are with their projects. it would appear these teams are just doing trial and error and if they didn't get the softcap they can just abandoned the project. bounty hunters wasted time without gain. escrow the BTC for the marketing/promotion campaign and NOT the tokens.
Not reaching the hard cap is so much wide spread these days that I have stopped promoting for ICOs. The last one I promoted Bitbond is a popular name in crypto industry, one of th oldest and reputable P2P lending site based on Germany and issuing a fixed rate STO with a license from german authorities. There's nothing I thought could go wrong. But the project was short of it's cap on the end date. Though they distributed some tokens, they were dust compared to how much users gave their effort to.
even with mvp nobody can guarantee us the project will keep moving because the development requires a lot of money and time, from the start before participating or investing our money into something. we need to know what will they do and what they can do if they can not get their desired level of funding, we also need to know their source of income outside of the sales event if they want to build something that will require a lot of time to fulfill. lastly but not least, we need to know the demand.
Not really a trial and error method but I must say that we should always pick the best quality of a project. Most bounty hunter prefers quantity over quality because they didnt knew what project will succeed or give them profit. I do the opposite, I prefer quality over quantity. Even I only do one bounties, it doesnt matter as long as that I believe in that project will succeed.
Lately I have been doing Bounties on KuCoinPlay. They have the advantage of not only having an automated reporting system but also you know every Bounty you get you will be able to monetise since every coin they do is already trading on KuCoin Exchange. It is nice to know that your efforts will produce a reward.
Jump to: