Bounty hunters United we stand - page 11.

Darktongue

sr. member

Activity: 574

Merit: 250

Quote from: semobo on June 11, 2020, 03:54:43 PM

Limited bounty participants is way better than fixed rewards and obviously it is going to give fixed amount when a bounty has limited participants and capped at it.And also expecting the rewards in bitcoin will be a good choice so all hunters have to get united and make demand for yourselves.

But in reality it is not going to happen, sadly.

We can't confirm it, one process is good and the other process is bad. Fixed allocation is better for bounty hunters. Limited bounty participation campaigns have very low rewards which reward is fixed for you. High allocation bounty campaign never does fixed budget for bounty hunters. I have some examples in both cases but you can check both situations and do research on your experience.

BuNga_cute

full member

Activity: 1736

Merit: 116

It is true that I participated in many bounties but only paid a few dollars, it was frustrating but that's the reality. And I support limiting
the number of participants to bounties, so bounty hunters can be paid more properly. Hopefully the new projects developers and bounty
managers hear this, I'm sure if Limited bounty participants are implemented signature campaigns can be of higher quality.

kingzpro

member

Activity: 756

Merit: 13

DIFX - Digital Finacial Exchange

Quote from: Byakuga on June 11, 2020, 06:49:54 AM

I think it's time for bounty hunters to start claiming their right on this forum, I'm talking about bounties that wants hundreds to thousands participants on their spreadsheet but plan to pay bounty hunters 5$ each for their 8month work, this is getting more ridiculous every day, IQ cash bounty is over and with the current price per token you will be lucky to earn 10$ to 20$, if no one is ready to stand by me I will stand for myself, what I want is

Fixed bounty allocation or
Limited bounty participants

We can't keep helping new projects for pennies, we should take actions

You are right, there should be a minimum fixed reward amount for each task performed just like we get in real life jobs, it is really rediculous and unethical when these projects ask us to work daily, do our tasks daily with daily reports and after months of work they send us pennies, this should never be acceptable there should be minimum amount for each task otherwise it is not worth to participate or if a project has limited budget they should also limit the number of participants per campaign so that everyone ends up with decent reward for their time and efforts.

Kasabus

hero member

Activity: 2814

Merit: 576

Quote from: semobo on June 11, 2020, 03:54:43 PM

Limited bounty participants is way better than fixed rewards and obviously it is going to give fixed amount when a bounty has limited participants and capped at it.And also expecting the rewards in bitcoin will be a good choice so all hunters have to get united and make demand for yourselves.

But in reality it is not going to happen, sadly.

This is everyone's hope that bounty campaign should only have limited bounty participants for them to get higher rewards once a legit campaign is over. But this is not the scenario right now. We have to be more careful in joining bounty projects as scammed projects are flooding rapidly in the market. DYOR could be very helpful not to fall again in scammed projects.

hahay

legendary

Activity: 3486

Merit: 1055

Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform

That is a risk that should have been realized from the start, no one can guarantee you to get big profits only from the bounty because even events like this I feel have been around for a long time and not only now. What's more, you promote the project when it's not in the crypto season but at least you still receive tokens by having a sale price I think that's good because it could be that holding it will be good in the future or more precisely when the crypto season returns, because even there is something worse than that where after a few months they worked but no tokens were even received by the participants and at least I experienced something bad like that in the past.

semobo

full member

Activity: 1498

Merit: 146

Limited bounty participants is way better than fixed rewards and obviously it is going to give fixed amount when a bounty has limited participants and capped at it.And also expecting the rewards in bitcoin will be a good choice so all hunters have to get united and make demand for yourselves.

But in reality it is not going to happen, sadly.

Jocuserious

sr. member

Activity: 1936

Merit: 290

Actually limited bounty participate is better instead rewards pool.
If there was Fixed bounty allocation then lots of members do participate everyday, so after end of the bounty then hunter will receive 1$-2$. Otherwise limited participate never entry duplicate member and comfortable good profits everyone'' who are accept in limited bounty.

ZincUnrated

jr. member

Activity: 165

Merit: 1

Unfortunately, this can only work if we have a group where all hunters can gather together, share ideas and agree on a united front. This is going to be difficult since everyone out there is fighting for their personal and often times, selfish interest. Some won't agree on this and will simply go about their normal way of doing things, making it almost impossible for others to have a say as to how they will operate going forward.

Marble777

member

Activity: 736

Merit: 11

I also think about the exact same thing as you have said above, to be honest I strongly agree on the issue of bounty (Fixed bounty allocation or
Limited bounty participants). if gift managers hear this complaint and can reconsider then the bounty hunter deserves to get the same reward again.

Lizzylove1

member

Activity: 858

Merit: 13

Christ The King

I have now decided to be spending much of my time on trading and make some cool dollars rather than work for a project and pay peanut. Spend your time with profitable trades, do bounty at your leisure, when there is no leisure continue your core job.

BitSat19

member

Activity: 476

Merit: 62

Quote from: r32godzilla on June 11, 2020, 11:52:32 AM

Keep action, but nobody really cares about it. The situation is now bad for both sides and even that, bounty hunters will promote ICO projects even for less money, so you can´t be the one who will dictate the terms. Wink

This is point right now no one can do any thing for this because this forum is only for link nothing else developers using many other methods as well and they are doing this all for their own sack no one care about bounty hunters and we cannot do any good and proper action against them.

JasmineRose

full member

Activity: 630

Merit: 118

IQ cash yeah i hear that, when i check it, i leave that project because the time is limit.
i don't know how about it but i know what you feel.
all bounty hunter think like you and want to get nice paid but that is not real.

yeah we have to change this rules about bounty campain.

forexandcryptoauditor

copper member

Activity: 1190

Merit: 3

I see few bounty managers are already implementing it with their campaigns. The latest examples are BAL, Sheng World, and SPYCE, ludena protocol.
Having said so, it is the sole decision of the project team to have such a condition of limited participation.
If any project is having a $10K budget, with limited participants they are still spending $10K but the project reach will be limited than having unlimited participation. Within the same budget, if the project is reaching to more users or investors, then this is the way project wants to spend its budget. So from their perspective, it's right.
What we can do from our side is to get upgrade ourselves to stand out among all other participants and by joining more campaigns and so on.

Rafiqul

member

Activity: 1358

Merit: 10

www.cd3d.app

Quote from: Ozero on June 11, 2020, 09:36:36 AM

It has always been difficult to assert their rights by bounty hunters. Indeed, participation in ICO bounty campaigns is not yet regulated by any normative acts. We only have the right to choose whether to join the campaign or not. However, if we see that our rights are being violated - unrealistically low pay, additional requirements are put forward that clearly do not correspond to the nature of the work we are doing, you can create a separate topic, website or something else where to discuss these problems and agree not to participate in certain projects ICO It’s okay even if some bounty hunters join in anyway. The effect will be all the same.

You are right. I totally agree with you on this and I am with you. So far no policy or appropriate authority has been created to protect the rights of bounty hunters. Many projects run away without honoring the bounty hunters.

CashbackLover

member

Activity: 196

Merit: 15

Sovryn - Brings DeFi to Bitcoin

The value of the tokens is what matters, do some calculations on the whole allocation first before joining any bounty campaign, many bounty hunters do research on the project and missed doing research on the token worth and bounty allocation Worth.

bitcoin-shark

hero member

Activity: 2968

Merit: 605

in fact in recent times the rewards of the various bounty campaigns have been ridiculous or even unpaid all the bounty hunters present here on the forum should gather in an association and not accept jobs under a certain minimum limit is absurd to work for months for a profit of a few tens of euros

r32godzilla

hero member

Activity: 1361

Merit: 506

Keep action, but nobody really cares about it. The situation is now bad for both sides and even that, bounty hunters will promote ICO projects even for less money, so you can´t be the one who will dictate the terms. Wink

Vishnu.Reang

sr. member

Activity: 1988

Merit: 453

If there was unity among the bounty hunters, then a lot would have been achieved. But the problem is that there are too many of them around, and some of the bounty hunters (especially the inexperienced ones) are so desperate that they will agree to whatever terms and conditions, no matter how much exploitative they may be. So I don't think that unity can be achieved.. but bounty hunters can create groups to support each other.

maxreish

sr. member

Activity: 1330

Merit: 326

I know where that emotions coming from. I am once a bounty hunter that experienced to join and participate one bounty for 3 months and got $25-$30 I guess. Thats for three months. I never complained even they made the reward payments always delay because I know that the project I've joined can possibly be a success or not.

You can look for a project's value before joining. Even you receive high rewards or huge allocation of token, if that token will cost no value then it will be useless

criket

full member

Activity: 896

Merit: 100

Quote from: Guryon_master on June 11, 2020, 11:11:11 AM

Sad to say but the thing is it will be hard for the bounty hunters to be united for that matter unless the developer itself will dive into that idea or the bounty manager is the one who will be or have that rules already like bountyhive.

the manager should have the rules themselves. The developer must make additional rules, but regarding bounty hunter, I think the bounty manager is more entitled to make the regulation. there used to be managers who had the same rules for all projects held. such as the limited number of participants and it does make participants get a fairly decent payment.

Topic: Bounty hunters United we stand - page 11. (Read 6730 times)