Topic: Bounty hunters United we stand - page 13. (Read 6800 times)

You can express whatever you think is right for your judgement but it can't assure you that there would be changes that will happen since you mentioned that the campaign was already ended. It's all in the hands of the team who held the bounty and with how the project will proceed.

Joining this forum ain't assure you to be compensated it's just an additional rewards if you got lucky participating while learning more about this industry.

It has always been difficult to assert their rights by bounty hunters. Indeed, participation in ICO bounty campaigns is not yet regulated by any normative acts. We only have the right to choose whether to join the campaign or not. However, if we see that our rights are being violated - unrealistically low pay, additional requirements are put forward that clearly do not correspond to the nature of the work we are doing, you can create a separate topic, website or something else where to discuss these problems and agree not to participate in certain projects ICO It’s okay even if some bounty hunters join in anyway. The effect will be all the same.

Don't mind the hunters who don't care about this, maybe they still think their time is worthless, so they don't care about things like this, so look at the people who still care and support them so that there can be a change in the direction better, because things like this are also for the sake of mutual comfort.

Does anyone have a real-time calculator for each stake of IQ cash? I think the stake will be variety since each IQ cash bounty has a different allocation fund. 20% for each Hacking Campaign, Blogs/Video, Signature Campaign, and - 10% for Twitter, 10% for Facebook and only 5%  for Telegram.

That is why on my own way criteria in joining campaign in the bounty, as long as it is one of the potential and legit project.
I am much preferable for the participants who are listed below 100 participants because once their total number of bounty hunters
is more than 100 I know the rewards most of the time is just a bit of token only for each hunters. That will depend too for each rank of the
participants also.

sighs you are right, but is not the fault of the manager they shared what they have to participant, what i see is that they are many participant. in the first round they have over 600 participant in each campaign compared to the reward have. but considering the second round campaign they have 250 plus as participant in each participant which will somehow makes the rewards little bit meaningful.
but the first round reward is too small.

Yes, but not everyone wants to listen to complaints from bounty participants even though we give better advice to everyone, and on average the project team and manager only carry out the initial rules that have been made without making changes for the better.

TBH bounty hunters don't care, the moment you said you won't join a bounty because of too many participants or lack of limited participants rules from bounty manager many will still join the bounty, this will be so effective if bounty managers can become one but .........

Almost in all comments, I have read something that is true, so maybe let's summarize:

- of course, this is a great thing if OP would be able to unite enough bounty hunters to have the power to influence bounty campaigns or even the forum (why not if it could benefit everybody?), but TBH I have seen many attempts already made by more reputable members and nobody succeeded so far because bounty hunters are mostly selfish dudes  ,

- everybody should do all that possible to evaluate, do the proper research of the bounty campaign he wants to join, this should be well-thought decision because you will be working at least 3 months for them and it is wise to choose the best one, there are many threads already published on this topic, so I will not repeat, just try to find them,

- don't complain only, of course, there is a lot of scams and bad managers out there, but also there are a lot of spammers and bad bounty hunters who still think it is "easy money", but we all know that this is for a long time, not the case anymore. One has to be active and write really good content to get a spot in one of the better-paid campaigns. Sometimes even this isn't enough and you will have to get the Hero rank or to be between 100 most merited to even think about a chance to get a spot there.

- moderators will never evaluate bounty campaigns or forum administrators, they are here not for this reason. Of course, they can help with scams or problems with CM, but only if they wish to.

Low quality, spam, scam this is what is killing bounties, we all know that only well thought and well-managed bounty campaigns with quality writers will give good results. Nobody will pump a few hundred thousand dollars in a campaign that does not bring any results, that could be investors for ICO or traffic for a casino website. Only scammy projects will offer you millions in useless and worthless tokens to scam investors because they know from the start that nobody will be paid. Everything has to be taken with a grain of salt.
 
It was like this, it is like this and in my opinion, it will stay like this. Nothing will change, it can be only worst and one day there will be only a couple of places for the best once.

having many advertiser will help the project to get their target and have many investors invest, thats why they prefered having many participants.

If you really want to stand by it don't join in a bounty  that you see many participants already join.

I do agree with it. The decision depends on the team and they can't dictate them all. There must be cooperation between the hunters and the team.

We have no choice as the team is a party who has been holding the main key. So many times I have seen a lot of similar threads like this.

Yes, and in this case I will personally defend you, in general the choice you have given is indeed very good, but personally I prefer "Limited bounty participants" because with the Limited bounty participants, all participants will feel satisfied with the work they are, both in small allocations and in large allocations, because in this way a very even distribution of payments can be seen even though each participant's rank is not the same.

There are several options available and you should choose the one that you think suits you.
In my experience, joining a fixed reward campaign is low risk but you can't aspect more from it and you weekly rewards are much lower.
But when you go on stake and participants based campaign, you can hit a much better reward if the number of participants are low and the rewards are high as well the project turns to be a legit one.

What often happens is that the estimated price of tokens/coins when the bounty is running is always inappropriate so it makes the bounty hunter complain. the manager is very influential in managing the bounty to success and the hunter does not complain because it is in accordance with what is done. Managers should limit bounty hunters and filter only those that meet the fastest requirements or those with quality may participate. so of course the project wants, the right promotion and directed to investors. IMO

You're obviously standing alone as the forum has no interest in moderating signature campaign. Before you, many has tried but failed simple because the administrators of the forum doesn't want to showcase the forum as a platform where you're obligated to gaining instead the additional earning feature should be seen by its members as a privilege which it's since no one is entitled to earning.

The easiest protest you and other bounty hunters can do is to stop patronizing these worthless projects that pops up daily to leverage on your willingness to advertise anything you see for pocket change. They use the hunters like slaves and only pay them peanut if they want to look legit in other to avoid scam accusation and soul their reputation then blamed it in the market.

Build on your account and you'll be opportuned to join a bitcoin paying campaign which you're likely to recieve a weekly pay of what you should have received in the duration of your stay in those bounties you speak off.

Not a bad something to hope for but the solution is on the bounty manager that's in charge of the projects we are promoting, some bounty managers don't care what you are going to get, for them if you don't like you should leave but we have few ones who listen to complains and make amend, it's definitely something worth fighting for

This isn't a very good point mate, you said to avoid not getting 5$ for your hardwork it's better to look how many bounty hunters have already join the campaign, well haven't you seen whereby you join a bounty campaign with low participants and after a week or two the number increase marginally? Your point doesn't count

I understand the situation completely. Ive been there too, what Im saying is we have the rights to talk and discuss here about our opinion on campaign, but like what you said, moderators have different job than simply pick a good bounty for you. They have task more important than to monitor campaigns for users. Its on you which campaign to pick. If your tired of doing altcoin campaigns then shift to btc paid campaigns, but the chance will be hard due to competition. So I suggest be patience when finding and dealing with altcoins. No matter what we do the process will never improve for some new projects.

I am a bounty hunter too, we cannot expect good results to every bounties we are joining. Infact joining this forum is free. So to avoid getting $5 for the 3months work. Examine the bounty, do not join an over crowded bounty. Checkout their bounty allocation, it must be 3% to 5% of their ICO.

Why won't you talk this way since you are wearing best change signature that pays with top coins like ethereum or bitcoin, bounty hunters have the right to stand for their rights, they have the right to nail a bad project or bad bounty managers too, what bounty hunters don't have a right on is asking moderators to pick reliable projects for them, new projects are risky and this post is not about the risk but about too many participants which results in too low payments for bounty hunters, try to understand