So umm.. I was confused at how many people had such a high 'valid post' count so went and checked on some random people who had '30 or 40' valid posts.
The first couple I checked joined the Oyster campaign and then did not post a single time in support of Oyster - nothing in the Oyster thread or in other threads.
For example b3j0 joined the sig campaign and then every single one of their posts is joining and discussing other airdrops.
I hustled and worked my ass off to come up with original content.
Don't the rules say the posts have to be 'constructive'
The first couple I checked joined the Oyster campaign and then did not post a single time in support of Oyster - nothing in the Oyster thread or in other threads.
For example b3j0 joined the sig campaign and then every single one of their posts is joining and discussing other airdrops.
I hustled and worked my ass off to come up with original content.
Don't the rules say the posts have to be 'constructive'
It is true that its difficult to construct high valid posts and some participants often posts in their local boards. Although it is written in English, there are times that their sentence construction and syntax is difficult to understand and are poorly written. (which of course can be classified as not-so-high-valid-post)
However, although, it is our job to promote and advertise this campaign, I don't think it is necessary to include to what campaign we belong to just so we could say it is a constructive post. I think what ;constructive post' means, something which can help the whole forum/community and not just the Oyster community. Just my opinion. Tho, your posts were all well-constructed, and you've put a great effort and thought in it.
The random account I looked at posted a week of almost entirely 'joining airdrop' posts.
Ok well. Whatever.
