I dont know what you think guys but i think airdrop and bounty kill the project let say after the project finish the ico all the bounty and airdrop hnter sell their coin/token , this make te price go low.Since all of bounty and airdrp hunter did not care about the project.
Airdrops and Bounties aren't killing any projects, they simply get paid for promoting the project, if the project failed it's because the project use case isn't good enough, there will be low demand and once bounty hunters dump their tokens the value will collapse, this doesn't mean it's hunters fault, it means that the team don't implement better features 
Topic: Bounty or Airdrop kill project? - page 14. (Read 2368 times)
I dont know what you think guys but i think airdrop and bounty kill the project let say after the project finish the ico all the bounty and airdrop hnter sell their coin/token , this make te price go low.Since all of bounty and airdrp hunter did not care about the project.
Suppose, bounty hunters and airdrop rewards don't sell to investors. New investors won't come for a low volume or zero volume. To a high development and strong team, one project has a high volume. Several projects promise to pay coins but after success they paid Ethereum in 2018 but the price is now below ICO rate.
I can't agree with you on this matter. In crypto, publicity helps in many ways to make the project successful. The number of tokens that they receive for their works, it's not possible to damage the project. So basically airdrop and bounty are not responsible for any project kills. Furthermore, this helps the project succeed.
Bad projects from bad teams will always find lame excuses just like putting blame on bounty hunters for killing their own projects, honestly it's impossible because bounty hunters can't even control 50% of the project max supply, the highest that comes to bounty hunters is 0.1%
It's not same view for all project team, some know exactly how important bounty hunters are and some don't value bounty hunters, I just have that belief that bad projects are the only one putting blames on bounty hunters and airdroppers
You are correct, bad projects team's always making excuse to delay bounty distribution and they think hunters tokens will destroy this project, so their ignorance in bounty payment issue. A little bit allocation as per as total token supply, so legit projects never go down due to bounty rewards. No it's not we do not kill the project we just trying to help to promote. If the team think that bounty hunters will kill the project then they should launch the bounty campaign. Only the team could kill their own project if they are not serious to develop.
not a team or bounty and airdrop hunter that makes a project die. the inability of the project to compete with other projects that already exist in the market that makes them die. many projects die because they lose or don't have strong enough market support to grow and continue to support the project. 
I dont agree with your opinion. From my perspective the project already allocate the amount of tokens for bounty program. It usually around 1-3% and this number is tiny. How about the rest of it? I think you cant blame bounty hunter for the price getting lower.
well, I agree with what you say because I know that the price movement of cryptocurrency depends on the support of the developer and some investors, but most of all is from the developer, when there is no support from the developer it will make the price crumble, not the fault of the bounty participants or airdrop.
This particular topic as been addressed many times, bounty and Airdrop is not the one killing most project, almost all project share less than 10% of their token to Airdrop and bounty hunters when one solid investor can buy upto 10%, after Airdrop and bounty distribution, not all hunters will be willing to dump at a very ridiculous rate, which mean only like 4% of total supply will be dumped after distribution, hunters selling off 4% can't spoil any project with good volume on any exchange. Investors and the core team are the ones to be blame and not hunters.
I dont agree with your opinion. From my perspective the project already allocate the amount of tokens for bounty program. It usually around 1-3% and this number is tiny. How about the rest of it? I think you cant blame bounty hunter for the price getting lower.
Many don't understand that bad projects will always end up with bad results even if bounty hunters help to promote the project, getting paid is what bounty hunters are after not what the project will become on future, we do our jobs and get paid for it
it is a basic thought that must be understood by everyone in a project. they shouldn't have to worry that their market will be destroyed when they have a good market. good projects have a strategy of how to keep their markets going and growing.In fact so many projects were getting dead caused by various reasons, we can't judge the hunters as the main reason.
I dont know what you think guys but i think airdrop and bounty kill the project let say after the project finish the ico all the bounty and airdrop hnter sell their coin/token , this make te price go low.Since all of bounty and airdrp hunter did not care about the project.
the allocation given to bounties and airdrops is only around 3-5%, and I don't think it has a high effect on the decline in the price of the coin, which is very influential in it is investors with large capital. 
bounty/airdrop do not kill projects. the approach of the projects themselves to the implementation of such processes is doing this. Well again if the project can be killed by just a single sale of bounty coins then this is a very weak project and perhaps it does not need to exist
Many don't understand that bad projects will always end up with bad results even if bounty hunters help to promote the project, getting paid is what bounty hunters are after not what the project will become on future, we do our jobs and get paid for it
it is a basic thought that must be understood by everyone in a project. they shouldn't have to worry that their market will be destroyed when they have a good market. good projects have a strategy of how to keep their markets going and growing.
Many don't understand that bad projects will always end up with bad results even if bounty hunters help to promote the project, getting paid is what bounty hunters are after not what the project will become on future, we do our jobs and get paid for it
If you know how important bounty hunters are you will understand that bounty hunters should be treated so fair in crypto world but still some projects team are too cruel, they treat hunters like hungry homeless beings,
only bounty hunters ? what about airdrop hunters ?no this doesnt offends me as a former airdrop hunter but they should treat both equally because both hunters can help thier business grow .
they thought those who work on these kind of jobs are already hungry and homeless ? lol no not . we can eat and live without them . we joined them because we wanted to help them , they didnt like that offer ? but we also want an incentives as a remembrance or souvenier .
If you know how important bounty hunters are you will understand that bounty hunters should be treated so fair in crypto world but still some projects team are too cruel, they treat hunters like hungry homeless beings, not all bounty hunters are smart if not I would advice them to start avoid mediocre projects that have less good use case
If a project is already not demanding it's better not to release bounty Campaigns for such project because the project will dump once trading begins on listed exchange, also I would like to warn bounty hunters to choose projects only because of their utilities not because of how much they will make.
Bounty helps the project by spreading the purpose and knowing about the project. There nothing we can do but to sell the tokens we got. It’s a reward for us after a month long campaign. Besides bounty allocation is just few percentage of the total supply which I don’t think it will be a big impact for the whole project. Airdrop is just a small reward for the early birds and also to give some free coins for their future users/holders. 
I think that's how you see it,but the right is that bounty or airdrop promotes a project,it makes the project to be known,now talking about price action, the reward for bounty hunters or airdroppers do not really have any effect to the total supply because the percentage of bounty pool is usually small and its effect on price will remain unnoticed.
I have a contrary opinion about this. Bounty hunting is what makes the general public know about a project. They promote the project to ensure that the investors know what they're investing into and what they will benefit in return. Rather than killing projects, bounty gives life to it
Pretty less amount of people follow the social media handles of the projects and when the bounty participants start promoting the projects then actually a lot of people start following the project or at least the number get increased from the initial number of followers. Also we can say the same about the investors investing in the projects, they just want to get out of those dying coins and can sell their coins to the general public for a loss but the bounty participants actually know what their time is worth and then only sell their tokens if they think that the price is right for them to sell. 
I dont know what you think guys but i think airdrop and bounty kill the project let say after the project finish the ico all the bounty and airdrop hnter sell their coin/token , this make te price go low.Since all of bounty and airdrp hunter did not care about the project.
Airdrop and Bounty will never kill a project, only the team can kill it
As long as the team remains consistent in project development and continues to maintain its community well, the project will continue to live.
Look at Banano....
Banano is distributed in a free all the time, way through airdrops, contests, giveways, tipbots/competitions and faucet games.
And This ecosphere gets stronger every day..
Jump to: