Topic: Bounty or Airdrop kill project? - page 16. (Read 2397 times)
This perception is very wrong. Bounty and airdrop don't kill projects. In fact, the purpose of these programs is to boost the community base, liquidity and enhance mass adoption of the said projects. Sometimes, hunters don't get rewarded for their efforts and in most cases, price dump before rewards are being distributed to hunters. What kills projects faster is lack of enough fund to further development and/or a pre-planned exit scam by the developers or project team.
It's not same view for all project team, some know exactly how important bounty hunters are and some don't value bounty hunters, I just have that belief that bad projects are the only one putting blames on bounty hunters and airdroppers
True, it's easier for a project team to kill a project on their own if they have enough funds and it meets their goal. If people lost interest in project then they could abandon it without anyone's care since the price also low. Sometimes, bounty or airdrop is just a ploy in their scheme.
I think what happened all this time was just like you said. The bounty and airdrop hunter are only scapegoats as a reason for the team to flee with all the investors' money.
I don't really accept this fact because before a project decides to do bounty there's always a particular percentage allocated to bounty hunters or airdrop which is usually small portion and not all hunters dumps Thier token upon listing so I do not support the idea that only bounty hunters kills project. Team dump sometimes and blame bounty hunters.
this depends on the developer. bounty and airdrop can make the price of a coin lower than the initial price due to mass sales. however, this should be included in the matter that needs to be resolved before running the project by his team. however, the survival of a project depends on the team. one of the factors that can make a project successful is the bounty and airdrop program. but, if without any plan, it can also make a project collapse.
I quite agree with your point. How can bounty and airdrops kill projects when they are the means through which investors get to know more about projects. Whether a project will succeed or fail still depends on the team behind it
I dont know what you think guys but i think airdrop and bounty kill the project let say after the project finish the ico all the bounty and airdrop hnter sell their coin/token , this make te price go low.Since all of bounty and airdrp hunter did not care about the project.
This has been discussed over and over again in this forum. There is nothing wrong with bounty hunters selling their tokens. What they are doing is what they are supposed to do. If the project fails, then you should blame the team that owns the project for not playing their roles perfectly.Next you have to understand that investors are different from bounty hunters. Bounty hunters are like when you pay influencers on Twitter to promote a product or service for you. You’re paying them, they are not doing their job for free. So don’t count bounty hunters in this, they do their job and they take their payment and leave. The team that owns the project will have to do what it takes to retain their investors.
I've seen too many wrong accusations from few projects so I'm not surprised that some will accuse bounty hunters for killing their project, someone have to be blame and that's not the team themselves, anyways crap projects will continue to be a crap project
Accurate accusation when there is evidence, because if accusing without clear evidence is also of no use at all, and in this case it is very suitable to blame the project development team, because they are building the project, and they will also kill him if the project they are building is bullshit.
Sometimes a similar opinion appears on the forum in the form of a new topic, in which TS shares his deep conclusions about what bounty hunters dump coin. Even if they sell their coins, then:
1) the amount of coins allocated to the bounty campaign is very small in order to bring down rate;
2) in the same way, investors and team members can dump course.
1) the amount of coins allocated to the bounty campaign is very small in order to bring down rate;
2) in the same way, investors and team members can dump course.
I dont know what you think guys but i think airdrop and bounty kill the project let say after the project finish the ico all the bounty and airdrop hnter sell their coin/token , this make te price go low.Since all of bounty and airdrp hunter did not care about the project.
Airdrop maybe but bounty are very useful as they were used it to spread their works. It was jus a little piece of share are given to bounty compared to the collected fund for the project. What was happened to some other coins was being dumped after listed to the exchange that many of the investors or big shareholders are pulled out their assets before it's too late or something that they need to get their money to target their expected profit.
Bounty and Airdrop don't kill projects at all.Bounty and Airdrop make the project more popular and make strong community.And for any Crypto project a big and strong community is the most necessary.
Because you know about Bitcoin that if Bitcoin has no strong community then it wouldn't able to be most popular Crypto currency.
Because you know about Bitcoin that if Bitcoin has no strong community then it wouldn't able to be most popular Crypto currency.
The highest bounty allocations now are around 20,000$ to 50,000$, if the project have good demand then the token won't lose value but if the token isn't impressive enough there will be dump, bounty hunters aren't the team who put together the whole idea
If it’s based on ICO/IEO price than it’s just nothing allocation for hunters because you know after exchange listing a several times price will dump. And i think this allocation seems perfect when it’s counted in the market price. All of the projects set over prices to sell tokens an ICO period. So those allocations aren’t worthy. 
I dont know what you think guys but i think airdrop and bounty kill the project let say after the project finish the ico all the bounty and airdrop hnter sell their coin/token , this make te price go low.Since all of bounty and airdrp hunter did not care about the project.
Most of the projects teams contributed to their failure when it come to airdrops and bounty. Hunters are humans and they can be control as well, to be able to control the market. There is no way you pay all the hunters the same day and still expect your tokens not getting dump as fast as your eyes can see. Pay the hunters and airdrops batch by batch can or will eliminate the arena of dumping from the project. After having a successful project either through the ICO or the IEO, distribution should be batch by batch to save your project from the dumpers. I dont know what you think guys but i think airdrop and bounty kill the project let say after the project finish the ico all the bounty and airdrop hnter sell their coin/token , this make te price go low.Since all of bounty and airdrp hunter did not care about the project.
Perhaps you do not understand what airdrop and bounty are and therefore think that they are killing the project. In fact, airdrop and bounty are ordinary advertising companies with the purpose of telling about the project and inviting everyone to buy a token or coins of a particular company. Accordingly, the participants of these companies are not obliged to keep tokens, since this is a one-time job for which each participant wants to receive money, as for ordinary work. The fact that companies fail is not because of the participants in the airdrop or bounty, but because the companies themselves do not want to pay or drain their token themselves, and blame the airdrop and bounty participants. If the problem was precisely in the airdrop and bounty participants, then why not pay them in BTC or ETH or USDT and then there will be no problems. But no! They do not want this, which means they themselves are to blame for creating such situations.
Not all bounty hunters are dumpers, some of them are good holders, project supporters and have the ability to predict when to sell or not. Being tagged as a project killer is not fair at all because they have the right to sell or hold their tokens because that their rewards of their hardwork promoting a project into the community and help it to succeed in the crypto market. Having a bounty campaign or airdrop is part of the project's promotional campaign that's why, us hunters existed in this field.
This is the most widely spread idea, but is totally wrong. Cpuld you tell me how 1% of the total token supply could cause the disaster? It is the team, that is responsible for the drop caused by no progress.
that makes sense. somehow they always blame the bounty hunter. In fact, even though it can cause prices to fall, there should be a wall of each transaction data at a certain price set by the team. Well, it's just that, because when bounties and airdrops are distributed, prices are always going down, the two participants are always blamed when prices fall.
Things like this have often been discussed in several previous topics. If the project is afraid of bounty or airdrop hunters, then don't do the program. And it is not the bounty hunter that makes the price dump, but it could be investors who sell in large quantities. Because the allocation for bounties and airdrops does not reach 5%. even the allocation is around 1-2%. If the project is good, of course many investors will be interested, so in this case the project will return to whether it is good or not.
True, it's easier for a project team to kill a project on their own if they have enough funds and it meets their goal. If people lost interest in project then they could abandon it without anyone's care since the price also low. Sometimes, bounty or airdrop is just a ploy in their scheme.
I think what happened all this time was just like you said. The bounty and airdrop hunter are only scapegoats as a reason for the team to flee with all the investors' money. I've seen too many wrong accusations from few projects so I'm not surprised that some will accuse bounty hunters for killing their project, someone have to be blame and that's not the team themselves, anyways crap projects will continue to be a crap project
Accurate accusation when there is evidence, because if accusing without clear evidence is also of no use at all, and in this case it is very suitable to blame the project development team, because they are building the project, and they will also kill him if the project they are building is bullshit.
What about investors? Did they kill the project too by selling their share when they don't like it anymore? What about the team? Did they kill the project too by selling their share when they need to raise funds? Bounty and airdrop only a fraction of the total market cap of a project. If a project fails because just a fraction of these sold then that's a shit project.
It looks like was didn't wanna try to count the investors that have been getting big bonuses as the main reason to create a dump for the project too. When the team doesn't wanna do a lot of effort and that will make the project become a dead project with low or zero volume.
I dont know what you think guys but i think airdrop and bounty kill the project let say after the project finish the ico all the bounty and airdrop hnter sell their coin/token , this make te price go low.Since all of bounty and airdrp hunter did not care about the project.
If a bounty truely kill a project, why does the projects I participated before and now succeeded ? I think the price goes down is not because of the hunters. There are any other factors so let us also look at that way and have a fair judgement. Hunters are not the only part of that project. There are investors, did investors does a good thing always so they are not the one to blame ? How about the team behind the project ?
Jump to: