Topic: Bounty or Airdrop kill project? - page 22. (Read 2397 times)
I don't think so. Bounty or airdrop don't kill project. Bounty hunters get a little percentage of token. They get token by completing their bounty task. Bounty help a project for success. By bounty campaign so many people hear about the project and number of people buy token and help to increase project. This is the best way of project marketing. In my opinion bounty is good for project and this is not killing any project.
its usually based on their token value in whitepaper, not it will be decrease or increase. this small budget could minimize dumping risk atleast, although its not totally true. we know most bounty hunter want to convert their reward as soon as possible when already traded in market.
Yes, but a small allocation for a bounty campaign will not guarantee that a token will not experience a dump when it enters the market, because the price of the token becomes a dump is not a bounty participant even though most bounty hunters want to convert as soon as possible after tokens from campaign results are distributed to them. The highest bounty allocations now are around 20,000$ to 50,000$, if the project have good demand then the token won't lose value but if the token isn't impressive enough there will be dump, bounty hunters aren't the team who put together the whole idea
What is this allocation based on? whether based on the price of tokens that already exist on the market, because some of the bounty campaigns that I see are on average allocated above $ 100,000 in a certain duration, you try to check again the bounty campaign that was born specifically for this year alone. 
indeed from the bounty campaign and airdrop can provide a lot of benefits to the project makers but you have to know that those investors already know that if there is a botuny campaign it will make the price worse because surely the participants will destroy the price, so until now the bounty campaign is best marketing.
With bounties or without bounties a crap project will never do better in the market, it's why i advice bounty hunters to always look very well before joining any project, if the use case isn't good enough there will definitely be problems like fund issues and less investors
yeah, this represents everything. projects that don't have quality, even without bounties or airdrops will disappear soon. however, I feel that projects that have no interest in developing, then the price of the tokens they have will soon disappear from the market, and will be abandoned. The highest bounty allocations now are around 20,000$ to 50,000$, if the project have good demand then the token won't lose value but if the token isn't impressive enough there will be dump, bounty hunters aren't the team who put together the whole idea
What is this allocation based on? whether based on the price of tokens that already exist on the market, because some of the bounty campaigns that I see are on average allocated above $ 100,000 in a certain duration, you try to check again the bounty campaign that was born specifically for this year alone.
Bounties and Airdrop are effective market technique for new projects and that's why new projects launch bounty Campaigns, the payment is on team, they can either pay in stablecoin or Bitcoin to avoid dump or pay in token, that's team call but I d not buy the idea that bounty hunters are responsible for projects death. Presently we have many new projects that shouldn't exists in the first place, they introduce quack use cases that no body want to buy
indeed from the bounty campaign and airdrop can provide a lot of benefits to the project makers but you have to know that those investors already know that if there is a botuny campaign it will make the price worse because surely the participants will destroy the price, so until now the bounty campaign is best marketing. 
Bounty and airdrop campaigns should help project to promote itself without spending real money at the beginning of the advertisement. After the need, they distribute a very small amount from the whole token supply, so it is a win-win situation for both sides. 
Not yet, is bad opinion because you give wrong information with your world where bounty and airdrop project could kill some project, how ever almost bounty campaign project just allocated about 2% from all coin supply distributed for bounty or airdrop participants, just use your mind how come little supply coin could make and kill some project, I think when coin listing on market and have lower price is fault by project team because they sell all their coin supply.
I dont know what you think guys but i think airdrop and bounty kill the project let say after the project finish the ico all the bounty and airdrop hnter sell their coin/token , this make te price go low.Since all of bounty and airdrp hunter did not care about the project.
It's absolute nonsense to think that bounties and Airdrops can kill a project, good projects like Tachyon protocol, tokoin, Cartesi have proven that bounty hunters aren't responsible for death of projects, it's your choice but many projects still pays bounty hunters and they add more value in short time 
I dont know what you think guys but i think airdrop and bounty kill the project let say after the project finish the ico all the bounty and airdrop hnter sell their coin/token , this make te price go low.Since all of bounty and airdrp hunter did not care about the project.
Didn't you read about all token allocations they listed? Try to see the number of tokens provided for the Bounty / Airdrop program, They only give little or about 3-4% from total amount of tokens, And I think if all Bounty / Airdrop tokens are sold by Bounty hunter, then that won't affect the market price. So this is not because the Bounty hunter caused their project to die. 
So do you think the death of the project was caused by the bounty hunter 
It sounds so funny and it seems like you have to read a lot and see what really happens.
start looking at projects that have been dumped before distribution to bounty hunters
It sounds so funny and it seems like you have to read a lot and see what really happens.start looking at projects that have been dumped before distribution to bounty hunters
I dont know what you think guys but i think airdrop and bounty kill the project let say after the project finish the ico all the bounty and airdrop hnter sell their coin/token , this make te price go low.Since all of bounty and airdrp hunter did not care about the project.
In my opinion, bounty distribution can't kill the project yes it can cause the price to dump a lot but not kill it because most projects offer just a couple of % (max) as a reward which is not enough to kill the project entirely. and if the project is good then the dump won't matter because sooner or later the price will start retracing.
With bounties or without bounties a crap project will never do better in the market, it's why i advice bounty hunters to always look very well before joining any project, if the use case isn't good enough there will definitely be problems like fund issues and less investors
I dont know what you think guys but i think airdrop and bounty kill the project let say after the project finish the ico all the bounty and airdrop hnter sell their coin/token , this make te price go low.Since all of bounty and airdrp hunter did not care about the project.
Let's say you were only taking the crap coin as an example to take your conclusion but in another way you didn't even take what happened with the big coin like cartesi maybe. it has proven it's not all coins weredead caused by the bounty distribution and it has only a small chance to happen.
Bounties and Airdrop are effective market technique for new projects and that's why new projects launch bounty Campaigns, the payment is on team, they can either pay in stablecoin or Bitcoin to avoid dump or pay in token, that's team call but I d not buy the idea that bounty hunters are responsible for projects death. Presently we have many new projects that shouldn't exists in the first place, they introduce quack use cases that no body want to buy
The highest bounty allocations now are around 20,000$ to 50,000$, if the project have good demand then the token won't lose value but if the token isn't impressive enough there will be dump, bounty hunters aren't the team who put together the whole idea
Make sense it's the team idea to out the percentage and the value not the bounty hunters it's more like the project giving the offer and the bounty hunters taking the offer based on what the project is offering so bounty hunters are not the one to blame for dumping.
Bounty / Airdrop is a pretty good marketing technique so far, but if someone says Airdrop / Bounty kills the project. It is a bad project and is not in demand in the market, so the price of the token is easy to break when the bounty / airdrop is distributed. But see if the project is good the price will certainly not be affected, because the allocation of bounties is usually not much.
It's team fault if project loses value and become worthless, it's not because bounty hunters dump their shares, it's because the project utility isn't good enough and some times team uses huge discounts to attract investors, once price are too good the investors will start dumping.
A project never dies by bounty hunters because at least lots of hunter store bounty token till price long rising. Even there want good support a project bad timing, so a project death/alive depends their roadmap development activity.
Yes, whether or not a project dies depends on the development team and their product enthusiasts after it is developed, if those two things don't exist then the project will obviously be difficult to develop and always live, and this has nothing to do with bounty participants, because they only served to carry out promotions. Jump to: