Topic: BOUNTY PARTICIPANTS DON'T NEED TO PASS KYC - page 3. (Read 505 times)
I agree on the fact that bounty participants should not require to pass the KYC..there is no logic behind this...But again this is the decision of that particular company,manager or ICO..But they should make it clear at the very beginning of the campaign
O man, such a nice post! Thank you. I have just started to do bounties and this word KYC was making me crazy. Thanks, if i would have a merit i'd give it to you 
I think it should not be obligatory for every bounty participant, should be so only for those who get more money than a determined amount of money. some bounties are so.
I fully support this statement and I think that it is not legal in principle to require KYC for bounty hunters, because today KYC does not apply to bounty hunters, still I think that all projects should understand this.
I don't think its an issue. Everyone can easily go through from KYC. Its simple and not too time consuming. Most of the Bounty campaigns demand KYC these days. Everyone should be clear all the rules of the bounty campaign.
Mr Newbie, it's a very big issue
You're taking it literally that we can easily go through or passed this KYC. You don't get it, the point is the private information we shared to them is very risky Stop spamming if you don't get the point. 
I don't like campaigns that are asking kyc to their bounty participants especially if they change their rules at the last part of the bounty. I know kyc is important but it does not apply for the bounty hunters because they are the one promoting the project and not investing. The risk also of doing kyc as a bounty hunter is big as they may sell our information to other people which is bad.
such a situation, participated in the Bounty Company, did KYC. A bounty company deceived everyone and did not pay the counter, but our data is already with them. Confirm your identity - this already contradicts the laws of the crypto currency. The world idea of crypto currency is anonymity !!!
i support KYC, as it allows delete multi-accounts and increases the reward of honest participants. The only thing is, it must pass through a simplified scheme, without providing a lot of personal data.
You are working with the tokens not investing plus if you are a citizen of a country that is not prohibiting to participate to the ICO then it is valid to stay low in your profile then the allocation percentage in the legit bounties are not that much compared with the developer's shares and investors, approximately 2% to 5% of the total amount, this should discuss at the beginning of the campaign not after when we are waiting for the payments.
Yes, I think that's true. should not a bounty hunter need to fill out the KYC form to receive our token. Actually KYC is required for investors who invest in the project to find out the original identity of the investor. But I hope there will be no case of data abuse from KYC because investors will definitely be harmed by this sort of thing.
Not only bounty participants need to pass the KYC to receive their rewards, some free airdrop also need to do that, I'm confused and I won't join that airdrop, anyway, just hope for ICO project don't need bounty participants pass the KYC, but sometime work for 2 month and told us need to pass KYC, what should we do? Burn 2 month work or pass KYC? We don't have any choice ...
I totally agree with this everyone here, we bounty hunters shouldn't need to fill a KYC.
Just as mentioned before, we don't get the coins from purchasing it, but we are getting it because it's a reward from the job we've done.
Just as mentioned before, we don't get the coins from purchasing it, but we are getting it because it's a reward from the job we've done.
I agree with you. I do not like KYC for the bounties campaign. It is not necessary because the bounty hunter is not an investor.
I don't think its an issue. Everyone can easily go through from KYC. Its simple and not too time consuming. Most of the Bounty campaigns demand KYC these days. Everyone should be clear all the rules of the bounty campaign.
I think because some of the participants joining with multiple.accounts and.some are bots
Actually kyc is a good thing but because of all the scams out there, i refuse it.
I will not participate in any bounty campaign that kyc demands. I prefer to do without it.
I will not participate in any bounty campaign that kyc demands. I prefer to do without it.
The right thing is to ensure marketers don't reveal their identities, because the medium of which does the advertising is taken place ( bitcointalk) doesn't require it members to identify themselves ,hence ICOs shouldn't demand that.
It always belongs to the Bounty campaign that you participate in. The most signature campaigns don't have a KYC requirement for the participants. But I also know some campaigns where it is required to do a KYC. But that no problem for me, it protects the projects against multi account users.
Yes, we can say that it is for the person who have multiple account in same campaign but how about the personal identity of the person? What if there are something happen because they gave their info? But it is good that it is the plan because we can catch all members that has multiple accounts in this forum.
It's not big deal for them as long as the account is promoting the project even it's a sub account, We all know that they created bounty for promoting the project. They implemented a bounty campaign, then they should know and expected on this but there is a hole on multiple account user. You can borrow your valid ID of your family or friends and send it there, maybe there's a risk on sending others for the verification of KYC but it's 85-95% chance that you'll still get the bounty right? That's why it's better to remove KYC for the bounty hunters, they should find another way to promote the project.
And btw, this case should be handled in this forum or solved by the bounty managers to avoid this kind of case.
Well, most of the bounties now are demanding for kyc these days. We must conform with the rules of the bounties Anyways
indeed now kyc is there for bounty participants,and will likely be used in the future, I think kyc for bounty is not too important
Jump to: