Topic: Bounty problem and solution - page 3. (Read 868 times)
I think for certain parts of the bounties, there should be a limit. I to a degree agree with this, as companies can also hire professional PR jobs to also get the word out and thereby there can be some of the budget spent on professional marketers and some of the marketing budget can be shared among the community bounty hunters. Also quality over quantity for me is important. Rather than having a ton of people spamming left, right and center, it is better to have a limited participation of people doing a really good job to get the word out in a concise and most professional manner. We don't want the marketing to have a really heavy backlash against the project we are trying to help to promote to the General Public.
Maybe bounty hunter will agree in your opinion.because they will get High reward.but think that you are one of team member.Team member not going to do this.because more people join in campaign means more brand Awareness and marketing will be huge.So it’s just your personal Opinion.team members or bounty manager not going to accept this.
There may be a limited number of campaigns, but not all of them, and if limited, there may be 1000-2000 participants. So now joining a bounty campaign that has a lot of participants will only get a penny and better find another project that still has a few participants
The bounty campaign that has a limit on participants has a huge boost not just to the bounty campaign organizers but also to the bounty hunter. Because it avoids the serious fraud of other participants in multiple accounts, spam and much more. It also helps for bounty hunters to earn enough rewards and of course to make it worth the effort and sacrifice.
No it will not boost the campaign if they make it to limited people to participate.I dont think that too many participants is the big problem right now since more of the members here do not want to join in any bounty any more, because of too many scam project before.
RESTRICTIONS AND LIMITATIONS FOR PARTICIPATION IN A BOUNTY CAMPAIGN EQUAL TO HIGHER PAYOUTS
I think its time that bounty managers should start putting limitations on new bounty projects to avoid spams, the problem in this space today apart from scam projects is this forum is flooded with spammers and too many bounty hunters which makes reward unfair for hunters, what do you think? Agreed or disagreed? drop your points below
Using your logic, they want to make as much promotion as possible and reach as broad as possible with little capital. I think its time that bounty managers should start putting limitations on new bounty projects to avoid spams, the problem in this space today apart from scam projects is this forum is flooded with spammers and too many bounty hunters which makes reward unfair for hunters, what do you think? Agreed or disagreed? drop your points below
That is a strategy for the project owner. If you want to be rich try another business that generates more returns than you spend your time in vain for bounties.
the most important thing about this problem or to avoid a scam project is to require the project to hire a trusted manager in the forum, i think that is enough to minimize scammer and if that can't be done then come back about self control not to be greedy and carelessly promote the project, because by staying cautious and having good knowledge that will keep you safe from scammer
RESTRICTIONS AND LIMITATIONS FOR PARTICIPATION IN A BOUNTY CAMPAIGN EQUAL TO HIGHER PAYOUTS
I think its time that bounty managers should start putting limitations on new bounty projects to avoid spams, the problem in this space today apart from scam projects is this forum is flooded with spammers and too many bounty hunters which makes reward unfair for hunters, what do you think? Agreed or disagreed? drop your points below
I think its time that bounty managers should start putting limitations on new bounty projects to avoid spams, the problem in this space today apart from scam projects is this forum is flooded with spammers and too many bounty hunters which makes reward unfair for hunters, what do you think? Agreed or disagreed? drop your points below
I agree and it should be implemented I participated in one bounty campaign it has huge rewards but even it is the huge rewards, I only got small fraction because of the so many participants in the campaign, all those huge allocations rewards goes to thousands of participants, that no one got a big portion of the slice.
Limiting the number of participants won't help them since all are just going to dump anyway to they might as well just accept just about anyone coming to join the campaign. One solution for a low rank user in bitcointalk because you can't join the signature campaign then just take the blogging and youtube campaign, there is a higher allocation for these campaigns.
in my opinion, i think the bounty manager and team projects should derive a means to tackle spammers and scammers on the bounty before lunching the program. they should put in more effort on this to tackle this issue and retain the projects dignity
The bounty campaign that has a limit on participants has a huge boost not just to the bounty campaign organizers but also to the bounty hunter. Because it avoids the serious fraud of other participants in multiple accounts, spam and much more. It also helps for bounty hunters to earn enough rewards and of course to make it worth the effort and sacrifice.
I doubt it that they will limit the participation for their bounty. They want to maximize the exposure they can get in the forum that's why they don't have limitations. Some do have but this is for budgeted campaigns but for those bounties that will just pay with their own tokens, why would they care about the payment if they'll pay out of thin air?
limit the number of participants and reduce the number of bounty allocations, because the more allocations, the more participants will join and be accepted. make a rule with a minimum account rank, so each rank can only join a few participants, the goal is to minimize spam and so on, this way the allocation and the number of stake that can be stable.
Is it too much of bounty hunters the problem? No its not, infact every bounty allocations from 100k is more than enough, present market condition is the enemy here and secondly scammers have successfully ruin the heart of investors, they are no more interested in new projects these days
I think the author of a topic exaggerates the problem. Bounties now often do not recruit the right number of bounty hunters.Therefore, I assume that limiting the number of participants is not relevant now.
Lol same here, bounty hunters are getting reduced maybe its because of too many failed bounty projects in 2019 lol, i have few friends who quit already too, not everyone has patience and persistence spirit to continue hunting but i hope 2020 will be different
I think the author of a topic exaggerates the problem. Bounties now often do not recruit the right number of bounty hunters.Therefore, I assume that limiting the number of participants is not relevant now.
Thousands of people's account is more than enough to spread the words about a particular project on social media, it will make sense if there is some limited participants like OP said, many are using bots to gain followers on twitter and facebook that is why you will see twitter spreadsheet overcrowded, the fact is it doesn't help at all
To me i don't think restriction is the solution. Some that will qualify will still spam the thread or group. Penalty/punishment should be the best solution. If you caught spamming or its like; you will be punish.
RESTRICTIONS AND LIMITATIONS FOR PARTICIPATION IN A BOUNTY CAMPAIGN EQUAL TO HIGHER PAYOUTS
I think its time that bounty managers should start putting limitations on new bounty projects to avoid spams, the problem in this space today apart from scam projects is this forum is flooded with spammers and too many bounty hunters which makes reward unfair for hunters, what do you think? Agreed or disagreed? drop your points below
A number of bounty hunters are using bots and their social media accounts are empty and have followed and subscribed each other increasing their followers which do not make any benefit to the projects. The managers have to take care of this issue. The other issue is from the projects which fail because of the developers mistake in this solution they have to ensure to pay in BTC in case of failure. I think its time that bounty managers should start putting limitations on new bounty projects to avoid spams, the problem in this space today apart from scam projects is this forum is flooded with spammers and too many bounty hunters which makes reward unfair for hunters, what do you think? Agreed or disagreed? drop your points below
I think that it would not be bad for an independent expert to be created on the form who will check all created bounty topics and those that in his opinion are fraudulent, let him delete it. And it would also be nice if each project would take something more serious about identity verification, so that unscrupulous program participants could not participate in several accounts at once.
I believe that what you listed is not all workaround, the first of course yes, it would be very cool but, accordingly, users who do not know how to choose projects would start participating in good projects, thereby taking profits from those who have long been in this system. And on the account of the second punk, I do not agree with you, because it’s stupid, the project will not get any worse from the fact that the same person reposted in two of his tweeters, but simply gives the smarter participant more money. 
If I own the project I won't agree statement like this. They want to promote massively without spending more money. So without limitation they will got massive participant with the same amount of money. Profit? Yes profit for owner not for us. Remember they create bounty program for promoting product not for make us rich.
Yes it is true, the fact is that many projects do not limit the number of people who can participate in it because they can get many people to be able to promote their projects and I think this is a very good and beneficial thing for them because more and more people are promoting projects the higher the chance of getting investors to invest and use the funds to develop their projects.Jump to: