Topic: Bounty Share vs. Fixed Bounty Payout - page 2. (Read 385 times)
indeed the current number of participants is very much and affects the amount we get from the bounty hunter program, and the share distribution we get is shared to all participants based on what they have done, because usually the allocation for bounty hunter is not more than 5 percent of sales or overall token
Many of you might have noticed some bounty programs payout by shares (the more people involved, the less tokens you get). Others payout a fixed amount. Example complete (a) and receive 100 tokens.
I personally think bounty shares are a scam that no one can calculate without having access to participant data (which is never provided).
Fixed amount bounties are much more traditional and in the bounty hunter tradition. You get what your promised.
What are your thoughts and which do you recommend?
I personally think bounty shares are a scam that no one can calculate without having access to participant data (which is never provided).
Fixed amount bounties are much more traditional and in the bounty hunter tradition. You get what your promised.
What are your thoughts and which do you recommend?
It wasn't a scam bro, it only depends on the terms of a project ico. We cannot assure for that as long as it will be done. Most of the bounties are in fix form it will also depends on how many participants listed.
Recently, there is a lot of scam among the bounty campaigns. Also ICO projects can not attract investors from a falling market that does not allow paying bounty hunters the promised tokens.
I consider it necessary to make a limit of participants! I do not understand those people who follow good managers and join their bounty, earning a few dollars ... I try to make bounties that are heavy, that would register fewer participants and eventually get good money! Good managers are asked to do 3 retweets a week or 5 retweets, so they recruit 5,000 participants, which is good for the project and managers, but not for bounty hunters!
For me, I think bounty share is still fine. If you wanna complain about bounty share, at first you should take a look at your rank then you should take a look at which part of bounty that you joined. If you only join Facebook and Twitter bounty part so I think there is nothing to complain when you only received small amount of token from each bounty campaign 
Many of you might have noticed some bounty programs payout by shares (the more people involved, the less tokens you get). Others payout a fixed amount. Example complete (a) and receive 100 tokens.
I personally think bounty shares are a scam that no one can calculate without having access to participant data (which is never provided).
Fixed amount bounties are much more traditional and in the bounty hunter tradition. You get what your promised.
What are your thoughts and which do you recommend?
Almost all bounties make fixed payments. It turns out that the more people, the less tokens will be in one bet. Accordingly, people get less. But that doesn't mean that bounty Scam I personally think bounty shares are a scam that no one can calculate without having access to participant data (which is never provided).
Fixed amount bounties are much more traditional and in the bounty hunter tradition. You get what your promised.
What are your thoughts and which do you recommend?
It does not matter or fixed. the main thing that the project was on the exchangers! and the price did not fall x10
Many of you might have noticed some bounty programs payout by shares (the more people involved, the less tokens you get). Others payout a fixed amount. Example complete (a) and receive 100 tokens.
I personally think bounty shares are a scam that no one can calculate without having access to participant data (which is never provided).
Fixed amount bounties are much more traditional and in the bounty hunter tradition. You get what your promised.
What are your thoughts and which do you recommend?
I do not know what you talk about, but in every single bounty I joined the spreadsheet for participants data was shared in public . If any bounty choose not do make it public then I never join, because hiding something without any reason = shady acts . I personally think bounty shares are a scam that no one can calculate without having access to participant data (which is never provided).
Fixed amount bounties are much more traditional and in the bounty hunter tradition. You get what your promised.
What are your thoughts and which do you recommend?
share based bounties are usually paying a lot more than fixed one specially if they have no much participants, and btw bounties with high number of participants end up with much less numbers than shows after deleting multi account users and cheaters etc .... .
I have worked for both either stakes or share and fixed payout and I like most bounty shares as in this if bounty pool is big and participant are less you will earn big. Other side I have seen in fix payout very payments we get. And for particular signature campaign there is always less participants and bounty pool is also high compare to other campaigns so we will get more higher reward rather than fixed payout.
True. Bounty shares are difficult to calculate and you don't even know how much you will earn until they put you the value you earned end of the campaign or after some time once the campaign is over.
Bounty fixed payments are good but you cannot easily jusge that those project are really a good one or a potential project to give away your earnings once they are successful. In both campaigns you have the risk that the payment may be recived or may not be.
Bounty fixed payments are good but you cannot easily jusge that those project are really a good one or a potential project to give away your earnings once they are successful. In both campaigns you have the risk that the payment may be recived or may not be.
Really depends if you really trust and believe the project or you just do it because you got free money.
At the first case- the more successful the project will be the higher chances of you to get higher payout, on the other hand when it's a fixed payment you already know in advance that you are going to get X amount of money.
I usually go for the fixed payout because I am really sceptic when it comes to ICOs because I think that most of them are scams, I prefer to get guaranteed money for my work, other then taking the gamble of investing in something that I am most likely don't believe in at all.
Stay safe and you will be able to live longer in the cryptocurrency market.
At the first case- the more successful the project will be the higher chances of you to get higher payout, on the other hand when it's a fixed payment you already know in advance that you are going to get X amount of money.
I usually go for the fixed payout because I am really sceptic when it comes to ICOs because I think that most of them are scams, I prefer to get guaranteed money for my work, other then taking the gamble of investing in something that I am most likely don't believe in at all.
Stay safe and you will be able to live longer in the cryptocurrency market.
I don't think so 
. You only receive just little amount of token after each bounty campaign just because of your low account rank, beside I think there is one more reason that you join social media campaign which always has big number of participants and lower share than signature bounty
. You only receive just little amount of token after each bounty campaign just because of your low account rank, beside I think there is one more reason that you join social media campaign which always has big number of participants and lower share than signature bounty
I will prefer the fixed amount more, compared to the shared, except the bounty manager is someone that can be trusted. There is one thing i have also noticed about shared bounty, most especially when it comes to signature campaign, the members with higher ranks get tremendously higher reward compared to those of lower rank.
Well I usually prefer fixed bounty payout, just because it makes easier for me to know the amount of tokens I will get, but on either options you don't really know what you will get (at least in terms of fiat), so I guess that in the end it wont matter much.
You never know how much each token will be worth at the end of the ICO, and you usually have to wait a while before you actually get paid, so there is always the option to end up getting a good payment, or a poor one.
I think you really need to look at bounty campaigns as if you were going to invest on the project yourself, because in the end, you will be investing your time on that project. If you think it's a good project and that the tokens will be worth something, then I guess you will always be happy with the overall result.
You never know how much each token will be worth at the end of the ICO, and you usually have to wait a while before you actually get paid, so there is always the option to end up getting a good payment, or a poor one.
I think you really need to look at bounty campaigns as if you were going to invest on the project yourself, because in the end, you will be investing your time on that project. If you think it's a good project and that the tokens will be worth something, then I guess you will always be happy with the overall result.
I think there are mostly fixed amount of token payout in the bounties and I have not seen any bounties with according to share of participant. For now, thats the best option I guess, I mean this makes sure that how much ICO is willing to from the total supply of their coins adn they can make their plans accordingly as to survive the market crash that may occur after dumping so many coins at the same time. On participant side, yes its always advantage as we also can keep track of how much token we will be getting.
I rather hope that the calculation using shares, or that we know are the stake. The fewer who follow the bounty campaign, then the results we get will be more and more. And I do not think scammers can be seen from their calculation system
Many of you might have noticed some bounty programs payout by shares (the more people involved, the less tokens you get). Others payout a fixed amount. Example complete (a) and receive 100 tokens.
I personally think bounty shares are a scam that no one can calculate without having access to participant data (which is never provided).
Fixed amount bounties are much more traditional and in the bounty hunter tradition. You get what your promised.
What are your thoughts and which do you recommend?
I personally think bounty shares are a scam that no one can calculate without having access to participant data (which is never provided).
Fixed amount bounties are much more traditional and in the bounty hunter tradition. You get what your promised.
What are your thoughts and which do you recommend?
For bounties like twitter and facebook its obvious to have shared stakes, however for translation content creation fixed amounts are usually given. This is because project owners and bounty managers have fixed slots for them, on the other hand the more social media bounty and signature bounty participants they get the more promotion happens, hence the shared stake measure.
I go for bounty share, it pays more, but in a situation where there are too many participants fixed bounty payout pays more i have never been part of any fixed bounty payout for once.
Many of you might have noticed some bounty programs payout by shares (the more people involved, the less tokens you get). Others payout a fixed amount. Example complete (a) and receive 100 tokens.
I personally think bounty shares are a scam that no one can calculate without having access to participant data (which is never provided).
Fixed amount bounties are much more traditional and in the bounty hunter tradition. You get what your promised.
What are your thoughts and which do you recommend?
personally I prefer bounty payments that have been fixed but I also like when paid in a stake or shares.I personally think bounty shares are a scam that no one can calculate without having access to participant data (which is never provided).
Fixed amount bounties are much more traditional and in the bounty hunter tradition. You get what your promised.
What are your thoughts and which do you recommend?
usually a bounty campaign with a fixed payment system will be limited while a bounty campaign with a stake or share payment system will not be limited.
I believe that it doesn't matter what the payout is, as long as you due your diligence and work decently hard for it, any payout is better than not. What you should worry about more than the type of payouts, is will they payout? I often times find that a lot of these "bounty programs" don't pay out and that is what really ticks me off, not the type of payout.
Jump to: