Pages:
Author

Topic: #breaking Michael Avenatti arrested (report) - page 2. (Read 15678 times)

legendary
Activity: 3318
Merit: 2008
First Exclusion Ever
November 22, 2018, 02:05:19 AM
#39
https://apnews.com/71d38227507640e796d0db0b9256f038

Fake charges.

I can't believe the right would use a paid actor to accuse an innocent individual. Absolutely disgusting behavior playing faux victims.


There's a reason he's not investigation; there's tapes. Rofl.

You have serious problems with logic and reading comprehension.

"A spokeswoman for the district attorney would not say why prosecutors declined to take the case from Los Angeles police. Documents supporting the decision were not released because the case was referred to the city attorney and was still under investigation.

The city attorney’s office will review the case, a spokesman said."

The charges aren't fake, they are being referred to another jurisdiction. As your source clearly states it is still under investigation.

Ahaha. The charges were dropped in LA.

Now the case will probably pick up somewhere else when his law firm sues some poor Estonian actress who was paid off.

The problem is the sheep are too blind to follow this ruthless attack by CONSERVATIVES and their like.

When justice prevails, which I think it will, we'll see that this was a whole setup by a certain group who wanted to have the "actress girlfriend" make a scene "for a movie".

I'm willing to guess the charges were submitted entirely falsify ("i didn't actually report him, wtf - actress!!!").

The lawsuit will go to find out who actually reported and will lead nowhere, thanks "government".

Woo! Wanna take bets on how it'll play out?? Cause so far, I'm up a ton on predicting "eventualities" of events from GOP operations. Take a look at Mueller's "setup". Rofl.

I think TMZ is going to have to issue a direct retraction "these events were fake" somewhere eventually. The lawsuit won't really go anywhere, but he'll be proven innocent.

CONSPITARDS a decade from now will find this and use it AS ABSOLUTE PROOF he's gulity of a crime, because he was charged with the crime.

People like TECSHARE throw out "HE'S GUILTY BECAUSE THEY'RE MOVING THE CASE SOMEWHERE ELSE" when the article clearly states he's not being tried by them.


If you look at his side at this point in history, he knows there's tapes that disprove the "supposed" incidence, and the cops seized the tapes; he wants the tapes out in the public ASAP to show he's entirely innocent from this accusation. At this point, we're just waiting for that evidence to become public record to "definitely prove" that the accusations are FABRICATED.

You are literally just making up quotes now and claiming I said them. Really convincing. The caps and oversized letters are a nice touch too. He is still under investigation. Come on you guys LOVE investigations right?
full member
Activity: 574
Merit: 152
November 21, 2018, 08:57:40 PM
#38
https://apnews.com/71d38227507640e796d0db0b9256f038

Fake charges.

I can't believe the right would use a paid actor to accuse an innocent individual. Absolutely disgusting behavior playing faux victims.


There's a reason he's not investigation; there's tapes. Rofl.

You have serious problems with logic and reading comprehension.

"A spokeswoman for the district attorney would not say why prosecutors declined to take the case from Los Angeles police. Documents supporting the decision were not released because the case was referred to the city attorney and was still under investigation.

The city attorney’s office will review the case, a spokesman said."

The charges aren't fake, they are being referred to another jurisdiction. As your source clearly states it is still under investigation.

Ahaha. The charges were dropped in LA.

Now the case will probably pick up somewhere else when his law firm sues some poor Estonian actress who was paid off.

The problem is the sheep are too blind to follow this ruthless attack by CONSERVATIVES and their like.

When justice prevails, which I think it will, we'll see that this was a whole setup by a certain group who wanted to have the "actress girlfriend" make a scene "for a movie".

I'm willing to guess the charges were submitted entirely falsify ("i didn't actually report him, wtf - actress!!!").

The lawsuit will go to find out who actually reported and will lead nowhere, thanks "government".

Woo! Wanna take bets on how it'll play out?? Cause so far, I'm up a ton on predicting "eventualities" of events from GOP operations. Take a look at Mueller's "setup". Rofl.

I think TMZ is going to have to issue a direct retraction "these events were fake" somewhere eventually. The lawsuit won't really go anywhere, but he'll be proven innocent.

CONSPITARDS a decade from now will find this and use it AS ABSOLUTE PROOF he's gulity of a crime, because he was charged with the crime.

People like TECSHARE throw out "HE'S GUILTY BECAUSE THEY'RE MOVING THE CASE SOMEWHERE ELSE" when the article clearly states he's not being tried by them.


If you look at his side at this point in history, he knows there's tapes that disprove the "supposed" incidence, and the cops seized the tapes; he wants the tapes out in the public ASAP to show he's entirely innocent from this accusation. At this point, we're just waiting for that evidence to become public record to "definitely prove" that the accusations are FABRICATED.
legendary
Activity: 3318
Merit: 2008
First Exclusion Ever
November 21, 2018, 08:45:38 PM
#37
https://apnews.com/71d38227507640e796d0db0b9256f038

Fake charges.

I can't believe the right would use a paid actor to accuse an innocent individual. Absolutely disgusting behavior playing faux victims.


There's a reason he's not investigation; there's tapes. Rofl.

You have serious problems with logic and reading comprehension.

"A spokeswoman for the district attorney would not say why prosecutors declined to take the case from Los Angeles police. Documents supporting the decision were not released because the case was referred to the city attorney and was still under investigation.

The city attorney’s office will review the case, a spokesman said."

The charges aren't fake, they are being referred to another jurisdiction. As your source clearly states it is still under investigation.
full member
Activity: 574
Merit: 152
November 21, 2018, 08:30:14 PM
#36
https://apnews.com/71d38227507640e796d0db0b9256f038

Fake charges.

I can't believe the right would use a paid actor to accuse an innocent individual. Absolutely disgusting behavior playing faux victims.


There's a reason he's not investigation; there's tapes. Rofl.
copper member
Activity: 2996
Merit: 2374
November 18, 2018, 07:57:14 PM
#35
A suspect can deny gravity if they want, they are free to, that doesn't make gravity go away or change. Also denying charges is not equivalent to rejecting the entire judicial process. Also, weren't you people fond of saying over and over again "this is not a criminal investigation, it is a job interview?" So which is it?

The kettle calling the pot black right there.

Weren't you one of the people the enjoy sucking trump's cock? Cause I'm pretty sure you do that in every thread regardless of the topic.

Avenatti respects the legal system unlike others.
Um, yea, that’s not true.

Creepy Porn Lawyer is under investigation for multiple ethical issues by the Bar. He is under investigation by law enforcement for perjury related issues.

On its face, he has taken actions that were not in the best interest of his client but would benefit him.

I am fairly confident there are other issues that I can’t think of right now.
legendary
Activity: 2926
Merit: 1386
November 18, 2018, 03:57:56 PM
#34
A suspect can deny gravity if they want, they are free to, that doesn't make gravity go away or change. Also denying charges is not equivalent to rejecting the entire judicial process. Also, weren't you people fond of saying over and over again "this is not a criminal investigation, it is a job interview?" So which is it?

The kettle calling the pot black right there.

Weren't you one of the people the enjoy sucking trump's cock? Cause I'm pretty sure you do that in every thread regardless of the topic.

Avenatti respects the legal system unlike others.

Quoting for posterity, since no one else took a full quote. Wouldn't want it edited out later right?

Blue certainly does have a fixation on sucking trump's cock. I remain puzzled by the use of a homophobic slur by a rabid running dog of the left.
legendary
Activity: 3318
Merit: 2008
First Exclusion Ever
November 18, 2018, 03:46:40 PM
#33
A suspect can deny gravity if they want, they are free to, that doesn't make gravity go away or change. Also denying charges is not equivalent to rejecting the entire judicial process. Also, weren't you people fond of saying over and over again "this is not a criminal investigation, it is a job interview?" So which is it?

The kettle calling the pot black right there.

Weren't you one of the people the enjoy sucking trump's cock? Cause I'm pretty sure you do that in every thread regardless of the topic.

Avenatti respects the legal system unlike others.

Quoting for posterity, since no one else took a full quote. Wouldn't want it edited out later right?
legendary
Activity: 1806
Merit: 1828
November 17, 2018, 06:27:10 PM
#32
Look, be fair. It's okay if he wants to run. Really it is.

Avenatti? He's a clown.

Avenatti? That guy's just a clown.

I heard Avenatti is running for President.
I thought he was running as a joke.

 Shocked OMG, if he won the nomination, I think an epiphany on my part will come in short order. When I was a child, my favorite color was red.

legendary
Activity: 2926
Merit: 1386
November 17, 2018, 05:51:45 PM
#31
Judge affirms order evicting Michael Avenatti’s law practice from office in Newport Beach www.latimes.com/politics/la-na-pol-avenatti-eviction-20181116-story.html

Look, be fair. It's okay if he wants to run. Really it is.

Avenatti? He's a clown.

Avenatti? That guy's just a clown.

I heard Avenatti is running for President.
I thought he was running as a joke.
legendary
Activity: 3318
Merit: 2008
First Exclusion Ever
November 17, 2018, 04:57:37 PM
#30
Judge affirms order evicting Michael Avenatti’s law practice from office in Newport Beach www.latimes.com/politics/la-na-pol-avenatti-eviction-20181116-story.html
donator
Activity: 4760
Merit: 4323
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
November 15, 2018, 09:43:40 PM
#29
...

PS: You do know the term "retarded" is not approved by the PC police.

What?

I thought it was like the "N" word for blacks, it's PC to use it if you are one.



Nobody should be surprised that a person like Avenatti would get caught up like this. So many examples of double standards these days. People blindly defending him are outing themselves as sheep.
full member
Activity: 574
Merit: 152
November 15, 2018, 01:39:58 PM
#28
Luckily, we have a fairly robust justice system, so even when assholes refuse to step down, they'll still be held accountable.

Unfortunately, those assholes are the ones who can nominate and approve federal court judges for the foreseeable future. Hopefully, they won't invoke much more damage on our "robust justice system" before all is said in done. Fortunately, in Avenatti's case, it will be done through the local courts. So the federal courts likely will not get involved.

As far as I'm aware, the GOP lost majority in the senate to approve federal judges now that a GOP senate member has pledged to no longer approve appointing Trump nominations due to the whole Whitaker thing.

I think we're starting to see the collapse of the Republican party on that front.

On this front, it'll be interesting to see who the accuser is and watch their testimony. Hopefully this case doesn't end in a private settlement, but becomes public record for everyone to see.

Until more information is available, all we can do is make wild guesses.
legendary
Activity: 1806
Merit: 1828
November 15, 2018, 01:36:01 PM
#27
Luckily, we have a fairly robust justice system, so even when assholes refuse to step down, they'll still be held accountable.

Unfortunately, those assholes are the ones who can nominate and approve federal court judges for the foreseeable future. Hopefully, they won't invoke much more damage on our "robust justice system" before all is said in done. Fortunately, in Avenatti's case, it will be done through the local courts. So the federal courts likely will not get involved.
full member
Activity: 574
Merit: 152
November 15, 2018, 01:28:42 PM
#26

I mean, following your logic, half the GOP and Trump needs to resign instantly if you want to set your own (retarded) standard.

Luckily, we already have a legal justice system for the standard here in America Smiley

Yes, that would make me really happy if Trump and half the GOP resigned. Al Franken did the right thing. Grin

PS: You do know the term "retarded" is not approved by the PC police.

Luckily, we have a fairly robust justice system, so even when assholes refuse to step down, they'll still be held accountable.

I really wish Russia would leak the hacked GOP details. That's gonna cause a media frenzy; I do wonder how many rapist/sexual assault GOP members will step down then.

Also, I didn't know you were a snowflake that's offended so easily, buck up buttercup.

legendary
Activity: 1806
Merit: 1828
November 15, 2018, 01:23:50 PM
#25

I mean, following your logic, half the GOP and Trump needs to resign instantly if you want to set your own (retarded) standard.

Luckily, we already have a legal justice system for the standard here in America Smiley

Yes, that would make me really happy if Trump and half the GOP resigned. Al Franken did the right thing. Grin

PS: You do know the term "retarded" is not approved by the PC police.
full member
Activity: 574
Merit: 152
November 15, 2018, 01:22:00 PM
#24
Whatever happened to #metoo? Aren't women supposed to be believed? Or does that only apply to conservative supreme court justices? Al Franken resigned on very minor allegations when compared to this. Or does #metoo only apply to sexual abuse and knocking a woman around needs to go through the whole due process bit?

This false equivalency argument is getting annoying as shit. READ MY FUCKING POSTS BEFORE RESPONDING WITH YOUR BULLSHIT.

I'm saying THIS SUBJECT DOES NEED INVESTIGATION. How more clear can that fucking be? Are you just willfully ignoring what I'm saying to propagate your own reality?

What kind of "investigation" was conducted on Al Franken before he resigned? If we are going to set standards, then so be it. But we must not make them double standards. Avenatti needs to go on a leave from his lawyer duties until this matter is resolved. He should have quite a bit of money saved up from the boatload of cash he has made. If not, he can write a book. I'm sure he can make quite a bit that way.  Cheesy


I mean, following your logic, half the GOP and Trump needs to resign instantly if you want to set your own (retarded) standard.

Luckily, we already have a legal justice system for the standard here in America Smiley
legendary
Activity: 1806
Merit: 1828
November 15, 2018, 01:20:37 PM
#23
Whatever happened to #metoo? Aren't women supposed to be believed? Or does that only apply to conservative supreme court justices? Al Franken resigned on very minor allegations when compared to this. Or does #metoo only apply to sexual abuse and knocking a woman around needs to go through the whole due process bit?

This false equivalency argument is getting annoying as shit. READ MY FUCKING POSTS BEFORE RESPONDING WITH YOUR BULLSHIT.

I'm saying THIS SUBJECT DOES NEED INVESTIGATION. How more clear can that fucking be? Are you just willfully ignoring what I'm saying to propagate your own reality?

What kind of "investigation" was conducted on Al Franken before he resigned? If we are going to set standards, then so be it. But we must not make them double standards. Avenatti needs to go on a leave from his lawyer duties until this matter is resolved. He should have quite a bit of money saved up from the boatload of cash he has made. If not, he can write a book. I'm sure he can make quite a bit that way.  Cheesy


It makes sense, they are probably just mad because liberals often use the ''guilty until proven innocent'' argument.

I happen to be a registered Democrat, who usually votes the party line. Don't put me in a box of "they."  Roll Eyes
hero member
Activity: 1624
Merit: 645
November 15, 2018, 01:19:14 PM
#22
Whatever happened to #metoo? Aren't women supposed to be believed? Or does that only apply to conservative supreme court justices? Al Franken resigned on very minor allegations when compared to this. Or does #metoo only apply to sexual abuse and knocking a woman around needs to go through the whole due process bit?

This false equivalency argument is getting annoying as shit. READ MY FUCKING POSTS BEFORE RESPONDING WITH YOUR BULLSHIT.

I'm saying THIS SUBJECT DOES NEED INVESTIGATION. How more clear can that fucking be? Are you just willfully ignoring what I'm saying to propagate your own reality?

It makes sense, they are probably just mad because liberals often use the ''guilty until proven innocent'' argument.
full member
Activity: 574
Merit: 152
November 15, 2018, 01:14:19 PM
#21
Whatever happened to #metoo? Aren't women supposed to be believed? Or does that only apply to conservative supreme court justices? Al Franken resigned on very minor allegations when compared to this. Or does #metoo only apply to sexual abuse and knocking a woman around needs to go through the whole due process bit?

This false equivalency argument is getting annoying as shit. READ MY FUCKING POSTS BEFORE RESPONDING WITH YOUR BULLSHIT.

I'm saying THIS SUBJECT DOES NEED INVESTIGATION. How more clear can that fucking be? Are you just willfully ignoring what I'm saying to propagate your own reality?
legendary
Activity: 1806
Merit: 1828
November 15, 2018, 01:08:20 PM
#20
Avenatti respects the legal system unlike others.

Why are you defending this person?  Huh Just because this lawyer represented someone who could bring up a sexual scandal against Trump? (and later Kavanaugh?) Quite frankly, I don't care what the president does sexually, if it is between two consenting parties. I guess the hush money is of some concern, but Stormy broke the agreement so she could obviously cash in for more. I really don't care for this guy. If he runs for president, I won't vote for him. I'll vote for a libertarian candidate before checking a box by this fool's name.  Angry At least the libertarians have it about half right.

I'm not defending this individual. I'm saying that this individual is calling for an investigation into the matter. I'm supporting said investigation as it's part of the normal legal system.

I don't understand individuals are having issues understanding that.

Whatever happened to #metoo? Aren't women supposed to be believed? Or does that only apply to conservative supreme court justices? Al Franken resigned on very minor allegations when compared to this. Or does #metoo only apply to sexual abuse and knocking a woman around needs to go through the whole due process bit?
Pages:
Jump to: