Merkel is doing Russia's bidding as usually, since she's being blackmailed with her Stasi file.
Many of the "refugees" have been sponsored by the Russian secret services, to inflate a crisis and shift European public attention from Ukraine to this.
The last thing Russia needs is a destabilised and weakened Europe. Last time it happened, 1941-1945 became a difficult period for the Russian people.
And Russia is screaming about the murder and hardship of people in Novorossia, not the the world is interested in hearing about it.
Don't put everything upside-down, Tzupy... Because what you and the like of you do, is try to frame Russia for everything and then see it it would stick. This strategy leads to such absurd hoaxes/accusations, as "Russia sending troops to Syria". So what? If it was true, would it then mean "bad" Russia fighting against "good" ISIS terrorists?
Also, what "Stasi file"? Tell me what is a simpler theory (let's remember Occam's razor here): some obscure "Stasi file" or a very palpable wire-tapping of Merkel's phone by USA and 174 American military bases on German soil?
PS: and while we are at it. Europe now pressures Russia that it must take in Middle-Eastern refugees, conveniently forgetting that Russia is already a host to over 800000 refugees from Ukraine. At least these refugees - unlike those from the Middle-East - speak the same language and carry the same culture and religion.
PSS: an interesting read:
http://www.rt.com/op-edge/315571-syria-russia-us-isis/Chris Bambery:
What gradually goes unreported as well is that Moscow has been attempting to open up dialogue between the Assad regime and the Western-backed opposition, the non-jihadist opposition. There have been some talks which Putin has encouraged. It was also revealed in the British media that three years ago Moscow proposed similar deals – a deal whereby potentially Assad could have stood down and a new coalition government involving a Baath party could have been formed, as a solution. The Americans and the British rejected that, because they believed they were on the verge of over throwing Assad. So what the Russian are doing here is rather more complex than what the Western media is also indicating. They are intervening, yes, they help Assad, but they are also trying to find a political solution to the civil war in Syria.
And on-topic from the same Op-Edge:
RT: The US is now blaming the Assad regime for allowing extremists to get into Syria. Is that how you see it?
Gregory R. Copley: Not at all. In fact we’ve consistently reported from the ground, from inside sources there that the uprising against the Assad government was externally sponsored, predominantly by Turkey backed by Qatar, at that time by Saudi Arabia, and supported by the Obama White House. This is an externally generated war; there is no question about it. What is significant is that the continuation of this war to remove President [Bashar] Assad has generated the refugees. Most of them have flown through Turkey and are then being pushed into Europe by the Turkish government. So this is quite a significant strategic development, and Turkey is the cornerstone of this and yet it is supported by the US. The clear answer to resolving the war against Islamic State is to curtail Turkey’s support for the groups which make up Islamic State and for the IS’s direct contacts with the Turkish government itself.
Aaand something from Lada Ray:
Syria Spotlight From the Horse’s Mouth: Syrian President Bashar Assad – Exclusive Interview to the Russian Mediahttps://futuristrendcast.wordpress.com/2015/09/16/whats-really-going-on-in-syria-from-the-horses-mouth-syrian-president-bashar-assad-exclusive-interview-to-the-russian-media/
