Topic: British hospitals burned dead babies to heat buildings. - page 4. (Read 3966 times)

In that case I can confirm that hospitals across the U.S. are being heated by babies, tumors, all sorts of body parts, as well as trash, food scraps, etc. I think our local EMS protocol is to throw everything into the incinerator except sharps, Haz-Mat stuff or radio isotopes.
But it's not like in the winter they go looking for babies. lol

So people would rather have them just waste that heat? Heat is a byproduct of disposal by burning. Using it for heating is the moral thing to do or maybe people just don't like energy efficiency and being green...

That sounds horrible!But lets be honest what else can they do with those dead bodies?

Everybody understood this bitcoin address was NOT going to support anyone but whoever posted it 

Why Bitcoiners should support British hospitals. If Britain refrains from bombing foreign nations like Serbia and Libya, there will be enough money with the government to look after the clinics, right?

Now at least we know what was the sex of most of that burning fuel
------------------------------------------------------------------


Minister orders investigation into abortion of girls
A new survey of birth ratios in Britain has been ordered by the Government, amid fears that sex-selective abortions are taking place


A new survey of birth ratios in Britain has been ordered by the Government, amid fears that sex-selective abortions are taking place in Britain.

Earl Howe, a health minister, said the Government wants to “monitor the situation” and “remain vigilant” following evidence that some doctors in the UK are carrying out selective abortions.

He also announced that new guidance will be issued “shortly” to doctors which sets out the Government’s interpretation of the law on gender-selective abortions, as well as further information about reaching and recording an opinion formed in good faith”.

It was reported earlier this year that illegal abortion of female foetuses to ensure that families have sons is widely practised within some ethnic communities in the UK.

That came after an investigation by The Telegraph in 2012 which uncovered evidence that women were being granted illegal abortions by doctors based on the sex of their unborn baby.

Doctors at British clinics were secretly filmed agreeing to terminate foetuses purely because they are either male or female.

Speaking in a debate in the House of Lords, Baroness Knight said that four of the seven sections of the Abortion Act 1967 “seem to be broken regularly”,

She said: “Yet it is impossible to get details of investigations into this law-breaking or about any resulting prosecutions.”

Lady Knight, a former senior Conservative MP, added: “Abortion law surely lacks clarity on matters that need to be clear.

“Furthermore, it suffers from those who play with words to the extent that it permits terminations that were never intended to be legal.”


http://www.telegraph.co.uk/health/10745189/Minister-orders-investigation-into-abortion-of-girls.html

Private or public hospitals?

See my post. The biomedical waste does add energy to the process, but even if it didn't they would have to incinerate/cremate it anyway, so they may as well use the heat.

New BTC address to support hospials in england: 143Nv6NLqCgcfassc83dVVA54KSMEnE4hU

The title of the thread obviously says they did, base on

Filmmakers working on Amanda Holden: Exposing Hospital Heartache discovered that the bodies of thousands of aborted and miscarried foetuses were burned as clinical waste in hospitals across the UK, with some being used to heat NHS buildings

Actually they will. It takes a lot of heat to get them burning and the combustion isn't self-sustaining, but you will get out more heat than you would have gotten if you just burned the fuel on its own.

As horrible as that is, are these bodies/remains that the parents are still claiming, or are these leftover bodies/remains that the hospital has to figure out what to do with?

Not saying it's a good, honorable, or respectable practice by any means, but if someone doesn't like whats being done, maybe they should claim responsibility for the bodies themselves?

I mean these hospitals have to get rid of biological waste somehow, I can't imagine they happen to own endless fields that they can fill up with graves (especially in over-populated Britian).

Obviously they are not using babies for heat. They are incinerating them as per legal requirements dealing with bodies. They surely also burn tumors, severed limbs, etc. Kinda gross, but not as shocking as it sounds.

Why is this news? 

So burning babies is slowing down the process of heating buildings. You need more energy, not less. Not really cost effective nor green nor smart.

The bodies wouldn't be providing any heat.  It takes far more energy to make a body burn (you gotta vaporize off all the water first) than you get out of the burning.

What they're getting heat out of is the waste heat from the natural gas-fired incinerator.  Around here, they use the heat to run a little (a few hundred kilowatts) generator.

I have to wonder what the minister (who is apparently a medical doctor, and thus really should know better) thinks should be done with medical waste.  He appears to think it just vanishes when he tosses it in the biological waste bag.

.... I'm begging you please don't go there -_-

I think this is immoral and unethical. Those should be given proper burial. They are burning those bodies like garbage not acceptable.

Oh?  So your views apply, well, to anyone, including of course those who disagree with you?

Well... some people cremate dead bodies. This was no different, as long as conducted in a respectful way.