I'm pretty sure Maged knows what he's talking about on that part. But still, I don't understand if people have data, why don't they share it. I mean, you guys are asking for proof of pirate business, but you don't provide much on your part either.
I wish that they would, but I'm not authorized to.
Topic: Bryan Micon's List of BTC Ponzi Schemes that should not be listed as "Lending" - page 6. (Read 119644 times)
August 28, 2012, 12:42:51 AM
Dear elux:
August 28, 2012, 12:41:03 AM
I actually asked Maged at one point to post it, because obviously, if there's something that can prove something besides hunches and coincidences, it should be brought to light. He basically replied back about how he didn't have anything definite or something along those lines (my memory fails me, I'm looking for the thread/post).
I also have yet to get a response from him after asking about his 'proof' as well. As soon as I brought it up and suggested that evidence would change my stance, there were no more replies.
Dear imsaguy:
August 28, 2012, 12:07:52 AM
Stop waving that thing around, hahaha. 
'zackly.
(BTW, I find it notable that that was peasant's 69th post)
August 28, 2012, 12:03:51 AM
Stop waving that thing around, hahaha.
August 27, 2012, 11:56:14 PM
1) BurtW, ...
3) The arrogance and outright lies he spread make me sick.
All right Micon - that's a friend of mine you are speaking about. Do you have proof that BurtW has lied about anything? Please quote.
And what about your lies, hmmmm? Provide evidence for the following blind assertions you made in a single post:
"BurtW helped Pirateat40 funnel 100k's of BTC to his scam via PPT bonds" - hint - you've already been corrected in this very thread.
"never invested his own monies" - while I could be anyone claiming anything, I know this assertion to be false. But most importantly, where's your evidence? You do not have any, because you are lying. Making it up as you go along.
In the course of just a couple weeks, you've gone off uncountable times half-cocked with wild assertions that are provably false. With never a mea culpa, apology, or retraction. I think you mean well in general, but your buffoonery is casting a lot of collateral damage. Put that thing away before somebody really gets hurt.
August 27, 2012, 07:31:58 PM
For the entire duration of this debate, I've been of a mind that it's impossible to know one way or the other without concrete evidence. I still hold that stance.
Good to hear. Then you'll agree that the evidence has always been overwhelming and damning. The lack of any evidence to the contrary is just a bonus. Whatever stance you are "holding" is in the face of that and the extending interval of time that pirate is in default, by his own terms.
Quote
Pirate's operation has been ongoing for barely a year. If Pirate does end up paying out, you won't have any wiggle room to backtrack on what you've said; your reputation here will be shattered beyond repair.
Then Micon has nothing to worry about.
Pirate hasn't payed out. By his own terms, pirate has defaulted. The fact that the situation has progressed beyond just a manifest fraud to a clear default (the only possible outcome) is why the bitcoin market is valuing pirate's debt as worthless.
So, go tell it to the market. See if it will listen to you. Get back to us on it.
August 27, 2012, 07:25:04 PM
Bet thread updated: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/--97094
No, I am not planning on selling the debt so there is no need to "mark to market". I will either get BTC back or lose them.
If Pirate pays eveyone then I do stand to make a tidy profit. If he does not pay everyone then I stand to lose a lot of my BTC.
No, I am not planning on selling the debt so there is no need to "mark to market". I will either get BTC back or lose them.
If Pirate pays eveyone then I do stand to make a tidy profit. If he does not pay everyone then I stand to lose a lot of my BTC.
dude you can't still be serious...
1) BurtW, along with Payb.tc are co-conspirators in this scam.
2) BurtW helped Pirateat40 funnel 100k's of BTC to his scam via PPT bonds.
3) The arrogance and outright lies he spread make me sick. I think he knew the whole time what was going on, never invested his own monies but wanted to make a % each week.
4) This "bet" thread that BurtW made is so laughable to update 1 week after Pirateat40 defaulted. Obviously it's a locked thread because he would get destroyed in the thread (for not actually making the bet, for accruing interest based on if an obvious scammer returns monies he doesn't have)
5) Let's all never forget when BurtW made his sig "No, BCST is not a Ponzi"
The volume of the PPT bonds was nowhere near BTC100k. At any one time there was BTC12k in the system, plus the interest. Each week 3k went in and 3840 came out. Of all the passthroughs, the PPT bonds contributed the least to the growth of the ponzi.
August 27, 2012, 07:18:35 PM
1) Positive signs that the Stockholm syndrome period is wearing off, miscreanity finally entertained the idea that Pirate won't pay.
For the entire duration of this debate, I've been of a mind that it's impossible to know one way or the other without concrete evidence. I still hold that stance.
3) here is a fun spreadsheet and I did all the work for you:
Pirate's operation has been ongoing for barely a year. If Pirate does end up paying out, you won't have any wiggle room to backtrack on what you've said; your reputation here will be shattered beyond repair.
You may do better pointing people to Albert Bartlett's lectures on exponential functions and letting them figure it out for themselves. The approach that was started with comes off as overly panicked and emotional when many simply won't listen in the first place. That's just part of the process known as life.
August 27, 2012, 07:09:10 PM
Congrats. Go find the post, it hasn't been touched. Maged even quoted it.
The people still reading the thread understand that whatever you say just doesn't matter. If it makes you feel better to keep up the charade, then please go on.
August 27, 2012, 06:59:59 PM
Don't you get it, imsaguy?
It's all over! Even the dumbest teenage "investors" are wise to the scam! It is pointless to move the goalposts now.
And now all that is left is to settle accounts in the legal system.
It's all over! Even the dumbest teenage "investors" are wise to the scam! It is pointless to move the goalposts now.
And now all that is left is to settle accounts in the legal system.
August 27, 2012, 06:59:15 PM
Weird how quiet it's gotten on this thread now that it's increasingly clear OP is basically right on the big one.
Potentially. Should GPUMAX stop paying out, I'd call the show over and done. I am perturbed by the delay, although it was counterproductive for Pirate to announce his move to close the operation before preparing for it. Right now it's wait-and-see. If you've been following #btcst you'd know that he hasn't disappeared, and has stated his willingness to sacrifice his own profit soon if he can't make progress with the initial plan. Talk is cheap, but we'll see.
As far as I'm concerned, Maged has been more disingenuous by proclaiming evidence that supposedly proves BTCS&T was a fraudulent operation, yet refusing to supply said evidence. If it does turn out that Pirate ran a scam, Micon and most of Team Ponzi were just on a crusade to save people from themselves, but Maged may have had sufficient material to establish proof. To me, that would be a lesser version of withholding the cure for a virulent plague that wipes out a large percentage of the population.
1) Positive signs that the Stockholm syndrome period is wearing off, miscreanity finally entertained the idea that Pirate won't pay.
2) Believe it or not, I have a track record of spending my time and energy to save other ppl I don't from scams. I am driven to do this because it sickens me to see a scam actively trapping innocents, let alone a BTC version - that really pissed me off - bitcoin could change the world! let's not fuck it up in it's relative infancy.
3) here is a fun spreadsheet and I did all the work for you:
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0Ah0rJ1eK8mwpdEs2MFRfbGQybGhNamo1aGhDSURaT1E
It's got a column of weeks, and a column that just multiplies the above week by 1.07
the fun facts, if you don't want to see all the numbers:
week 1 - Invest $100
Week 52 - $3152
end year 2 - $106,000+
end year 3 - $3.5M+
year 4 - $120M+
year 8 - you have all the money in the world
THATS why you can't pay 7% per week - you would have to pay out all the money in the world in 8 yrs if a guy invests $100
August 27, 2012, 06:53:23 PM
I actually asked Maged at one point to post it, because obviously, if there's something that can prove something besides hunches and coincidences, it should be brought to light. He basically replied back about how he didn't have anything definite or something along those lines (my memory fails me, I'm looking for the thread/post).
I also have yet to get a response from him after asking about his 'proof' as well. As soon as I brought it up and suggested that evidence would change my stance, there were no more replies.
"Proof" only exists in mathematics; it isn't required in a court of law. There is plenty of evidence. And everyone knows it -- even you and your ilk, no matter how much you try to pretend.
That is what I was asking him to provide.
August 27, 2012, 06:50:25 PM
I actually asked Maged at one point to post it, because obviously, if there's something that can prove something besides hunches and coincidences, it should be brought to light. He basically replied back about how he didn't have anything definite or something along those lines (my memory fails me, I'm looking for the thread/post).
I also have yet to get a response from him after asking about his 'proof' as well. As soon as I brought it up and suggested that evidence would change my stance, there were no more replies.
"Proof" only exists in mathematics; it isn't required in a court of law. There is plenty of evidence. And everyone knows it -- even you and your ilk, no matter how much you try to pretend.
August 27, 2012, 06:40:54 PM
I actually asked Maged at one point to post it, because obviously, if there's something that can prove something besides hunches and coincidences, it should be brought to light. He basically replied back about how he didn't have anything definite or something along those lines (my memory fails me, I'm looking for the thread/post).
I also have yet to get a response from him after asking about his 'proof' as well. As soon as I brought it up and suggested that evidence would change my stance, there were no more replies.
August 27, 2012, 06:40:22 PM
If Pirate pays eveyone then I do stand to make a tidy profit. If he does not pay everyone then I stand to lose a lot of my BTC.
it was foretold:
...
Let's just list some of fallacies that have been routinely used and/or likely will be used shortly by team "pirate, the miracle worker" (and by other community members on other topics too, of course):
...
Argumentum ad misericordiam:
"I did not murder my mother and father with an axe! Please don't find me guilty; I'm suffering enough through being an orphan.", "I lost so much money on ponzi and stupid bets, I am suffering enough, do not tell me that I am guilty of promoting and conspiring in a ponzi scheme and a scammer"
...
Let's just list some of fallacies that have been routinely used and/or likely will be used shortly by team "pirate, the miracle worker" (and by other community members on other topics too, of course):
...
Argumentum ad misericordiam:
"I did not murder my mother and father with an axe! Please don't find me guilty; I'm suffering enough through being an orphan.", "I lost so much money on ponzi and stupid bets, I am suffering enough, do not tell me that I am guilty of promoting and conspiring in a ponzi scheme and a scammer"
...
August 27, 2012, 06:37:37 PM
Bet thread updated: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/--97094
No, I am not planning on selling the debt so there is no need to "mark to market". I will either get BTC back or lose them.
If Pirate pays eveyone then I do stand to make a tidy profit. If he does not pay everyone then I stand to lose a lot of my BTC.
No, I am not planning on selling the debt so there is no need to "mark to market". I will either get BTC back or lose them.
If Pirate pays eveyone then I do stand to make a tidy profit. If he does not pay everyone then I stand to lose a lot of my BTC.
dude you can't still be serious...
1) BurtW, along with Payb.tc are co-conspirators in this scam.
2) BurtW helped Pirateat40 funnel 100k's of BTC to his scam via PPT bonds.
3) The arrogance and outright lies he spread make me sick. I think he knew the whole time what was going on, never invested his own monies but wanted to make a % each week.
4) This "bet" thread that BurtW made is so laughable to update 1 week after Pirateat40 defaulted. Obviously it's a locked thread because he would get destroyed in the thread (for not actually making the bet, for accruing interest based on if an obvious scammer returns monies he doesn't have)
5) Let's all never forget when BurtW made his sig "No, BCST is not a Ponzi"
August 27, 2012, 06:30:05 PM
Weird how quiet it's gotten on this thread now that it's increasingly clear OP is basically right on the big one.
Potentially. Should GPUMAX stop paying out, I'd call the show over and done. I am perturbed by the delay, although it was counterproductive for Pirate to announce his move to close the operation before preparing for it. Right now it's wait-and-see. If you've been following #btcst you'd know that he hasn't disappeared, and has stated his willingness to sacrifice his own profit soon if he can't make progress with the initial plan. Talk is cheap, but we'll see.
As far as I'm concerned, Maged has been more disingenuous by proclaiming evidence that supposedly proves BTCS&T was a fraudulent operation, yet refusing to supply said evidence. If it does turn out that Pirate ran a scam, Micon and most of Team Ponzi were just on a crusade to save people from themselves, but Maged may have had sufficient material to establish proof. To me, that would be a lesser version of withholding the cure for a virulent plague that wipes out a large percentage of the population.
I actually asked Maged at one point to post it, because obviously, if there's something that can prove something besides hunches and coincidences, it should be brought to light. He basically replied back about how he didn't have anything definite or something along those lines (my memory fails me, I'm looking for the thread/post).
August 27, 2012, 06:27:13 PM
Weird how quiet it's gotten on this thread now that it's increasingly clear OP is basically right on the big one.
Potentially. Should GPUMAX stop paying out, I'd call the show over and done. I am perturbed by the delay, although it was counterproductive for Pirate to announce his move to close the operation before preparing for it. Right now it's wait-and-see. If you've been following #btcst you'd know that he hasn't disappeared, and has stated his willingness to sacrifice his own profit soon if he can't make progress with the initial plan. Talk is cheap, but we'll see.
As far as I'm concerned, Maged has been more disingenuous by proclaiming evidence that supposedly proves BTCS&T was a fraudulent operation, yet refusing to supply said evidence. If it does turn out that Pirate ran a scam, Micon and most of Team Ponzi were just on a crusade to save people from themselves, but Maged may have had sufficient material to establish proof. To me, that would be a lesser version of withholding the cure for a virulent plague that wipes out a large percentage of the population.
August 27, 2012, 03:40:23 PM
If Pirate pays eveyone then I do stand to make a tidy profit. If he does not pay everyone then I stand to lose a lot of my BTC.
There was never an if and there is still no if.
Why do some people not get it even after it is twice as obvious as it has always been?
Got it... Its not if, its when. Thanks for clearing that up.
August 27, 2012, 03:31:21 PM
If Pirate pays eveyone then I do stand to make a tidy profit. If he does not pay everyone then I stand to lose a lot of my BTC.
There was never an if and there is still no if.
Why do some people not get it even after it is twice as obvious as it has always been?
Jump to: