Topic: BTC is DYING, LONG LIVE THE NEW KING LTC (Read 4858 times)
lol, bitcoin has the highest value among all other cypto currency , among all coins it has the highest satisfactory rate and it has many investors, as time goes by bitcoin increases its value more than before.
The irony on all of this is the fact that kiklo is one of the couple known anti segwit trollls that spend 24/7 posting segwit FUD, and the only reason that Litecoin is going up is thanks to segwit, because without segwit it would be yet another shitcoin, but now with segwit LTC is going to mars, and when LN is operative, it's going to pluto.
ShitWit has nothing to do with it.
LN is pretty useless on LTC, they don't have any transactions capacity issues to require offchain transactions.
Plus LN will require a banking license in the future, so for most it will be a complete waste of time.
Coinbase direct wallet is all that matters.
It's all about segwit dumbass. Why do you think Coinbase added LTC? because segwit sparked interest in LTC again after it was a dead shitcoin. Now thanks to segwit, Lightning Network developers will move there.
LN will not require shit, stop the FUD and kys.
The slow transactions and high fees hurt BTC ,the altcoins gained terrain and inertia because of that
yeah, I think this is the point
Don't make me laugh, btc will always be the king of crypto's.
BTC is almost over its 10 year product cycle, where a new product takes over.
I guess you still listen to music on your 8 track.
The slow transactions and high fees hurt BTC , the altcoins gained terrain and inertia because of that
bitcoin don't have slow transaction, transactions are instant like all the other coins, onlyconfirmations require 10 min on average to confirm, but this was done because of orphan block, i would be curious to compare with other coins the amount of orphan block they have versus bitcoin, i bet it's much higher
BTC has an average of 3 orphans per day.
LTC has an average of 2 orphans per day.
LTC is better & faster.
Zero confirmations don't matter, anyone can doublespend on a fool that does not wait the required confirmations.
The slow transactions and high fees hurt BTC , the altcoins gained terrain and inertia because of that
bitcoin don't have slow transaction, transactions are instant like all the other coins, onlyconfirmations require 10 min on average to confirm, but this was done because of orphan block, i would be curious to compare with other coins the amount of orphan block they have versus bitcoin, i bet it's much higher
Don't make me laugh, btc will always be the king of crypto's.
So many different stats and opinions, i'm confused lol
With the bitcoin rising there is space for an alt coin for microtransactions on net. And Litecoin has the look like a silvermoney in a game, and btc is the high value gold.
I think litecoin will rise so long btc would do this.
I think litecoin will rise so long btc would do this.
You had a point on it, Litecoin shows or stand as Silver money, and Bitcoin as gold. However, it is not because Litecoin increase more than the average of bitcoin increases does that means LTC surpassed bitcoin already, of course not! still the bitcoin prevails on top.
The slow transactions and high fees hurt BTC , the altcoins gained terrain and inertia because of that
What do you think about the current LTC price boost considering Segwit activation and LN?
Can LTC climb to 30-35 USD rapidly before Segwit is fully activated this incoming week and then to its highest USD value (48-50) after SW?
If it does, can LTC stay on this level for good and stabilise or shall we expect the opposite?
I got into LTC trading just a little before it starts its current rally where its price was around 10-11 USD and actually made some profit which I took out of the table as real money is money in my pocket not on my coin accounting/exchanging/trading tables
Then I bought some more LTC with current (high) price. I noticed it may not be the best way to make purchases on an asset when it is on pump but SW and LN looks promising for me.
Currently I am on negative side and losing (virtual) money for this trade which is still very fresh (yesterday to today) and ongoing and I will not incur real loss unless I sell my LTC for a lower price then I bought. Actually a market price of 33-35 USD would be good enough for me to make my expected gains.
Also I am not after incredible profits but I just would like to get some extra money to make life easier for myself, my wife and our cat
So far, for crypto coin trading, I build a little, test a little and learn a lot.
Hope the best for all.
Can LTC climb to 30-35 USD rapidly before Segwit is fully activated this incoming week and then to its highest USD value (48-50) after SW?
If it does, can LTC stay on this level for good and stabilise or shall we expect the opposite?
I got into LTC trading just a little before it starts its current rally where its price was around 10-11 USD and actually made some profit which I took out of the table as real money is money in my pocket not on my coin accounting/exchanging/trading tables
Then I bought some more LTC with current (high) price. I noticed it may not be the best way to make purchases on an asset when it is on pump but SW and LN looks promising for me.
Currently I am on negative side and losing (virtual) money for this trade which is still very fresh (yesterday to today) and ongoing and I will not incur real loss unless I sell my LTC for a lower price then I bought. Actually a market price of 33-35 USD would be good enough for me to make my expected gains.
Also I am not after incredible profits but I just would like to get some extra money to make life easier for myself, my wife and our cat
So far, for crypto coin trading, I build a little, test a little and learn a lot.
Hope the best for all.
With the bitcoin rising there is space for an alt coin for microtransactions on net. And Litecoin has the look like a silvermoney in a game, and btc is the high value gold.
I think litecoin will rise so long btc would do this.
I think litecoin will rise so long btc would do this.
It is too early to claim ltc to become the king there are still ethereum and then bitcoin still stand strong in the top, the rising of litecoin not going to affect much, bitcoin also got a significant rise when lite coin dormant in the last year, so litecoin will not take bitcoin soon, it is still very far from taking bitcoin place
The irony on all of this is the fact that kiklo is one of the couple known anti segwit trollls that spend 24/7 posting segwit FUD, and the only reason that Litecoin is going up is thanks to segwit, because without segwit it would be yet another shitcoin, but now with segwit LTC is going to mars, and when LN is operative, it's going to pluto.
ShitWit has nothing to do with it.
LN is pretty useless on LTC, they don't have any transactions capacity issues to require offchain transactions.
Plus LN will require a banking license in the future, so for most it will be a complete waste of time.
Coinbase direct wallet is all that matters.
Barry Silbert alone can do nothing.he is not even developer. I will never again buy ltc nor use it. fckmthfck!
You seem confused no one cares what you personally do.
It is the Majority of people that will use LTC,
1. They don't like wasting money
or
2. They are too poor to afford BTC insane transactions fees,
FYI:
If you are rich and stupid , feel free to use BTC all day , smarter and poorer people won't waste money like that.
Majority you say?
Well when I talk to people and ask what they now about crypto?
-Bitcoin ,Darknet. They answer me.
Thats all
What majority of poor people you talk? wich mostly is no education at all ..they even do not know how exactly the internet work. they do not need litecoin
Hipsters need Bitcoins.
Bitcoins it all that they now.
Well if you plan to open a world wide office chain and do it for people at place like WU and MoneyGram, please do it. Because blockchain is realyy cool and important. BUt it is too complicated for poor people sadly.
We need live people sitting in office to provide it to poor people.
Litecoin for poor people worldwide?? Well it is great but at this point immposible..
Even Bitcoin can not do it. VISA is unbitable transaction per s.
The irony on all of this is the fact that kiklo is one of the couple known anti segwit trollls that spend 24/7 posting segwit FUD, and the only reason that Litecoin is going up is thanks to segwit, because without segwit it would be yet another shitcoin, but now with segwit LTC is going to mars, and when LN is operative, it's going to pluto.
The irony is that LTC does not need or benefit from segwit + LN...
And neither do any of the other 5-6 alts that are working on segwit + LN.
The benefit comes ONLY if Bitcoin adopts BOTH segwit and LN in the future...
In which case LTC will be able to route atomic BTC transactions.
Again, the crazy explosion in segwit + LN alts depends entirely on Bitcoin adopting segwit + LN... someday long away.
None of this is complicated... but > 90% of "crypto enthusiasts" get it wrong
Exactly,
The same Chinese Mining Companies control over 51% of BTC & LTC mining.
They activates segwit on LTC and are blocking segwit on BTC, the exact same people.
1. LTC has plenty of ONCHAIN Capacity so shitwit , is no real threat to them.
2. BTC does not have enough Onchain capacity and core is blocking a hard fork that could give them more, so LN would directly steal their transaction fees, (which are insanely high to begin with).
3. Big promise of LN is to allow swapping of segwit coins on LN hubs, no offense but odd are exchanges could do it faster and cheaper than the LN hubs.
Plus if shitwit is never activated on BTC, that promise was false.
The irony on all of this is the fact that kiklo is one of the couple known anti segwit trollls that spend 24/7 posting segwit FUD, and the only reason that Litecoin is going up is thanks to segwit, because without segwit it would be yet another shitcoin, but now with segwit LTC is going to mars, and when LN is operative, it's going to pluto.
ShitWit has nothing to do with it.
LN is pretty useless on LTC, they don't have any transactions capacity issues to require offchain transactions.
Plus LN will require a banking license in the future, so for most it will be a complete waste of time.
Coinbase direct wallet is all that matters.
Barry Silbert alone can do nothing.he is not even developer. I will never again buy ltc nor use it. fckmthfck!
You seem confused no one cares what you personally do.
It is the Majority of people that will use LTC,
1. They don't like wasting money
or
2. They are too poor to afford BTC insane transactions fees,
FYI:
If you are rich and stupid , feel free to use BTC all day , smarter and poorer people won't waste money like that.
The irony on all of this is the fact that kiklo is one of the couple known anti segwit trollls that spend 24/7 posting segwit FUD, and the only reason that Litecoin is going up is thanks to segwit, because without segwit it would be yet another shitcoin, but now with segwit LTC is going to mars, and when LN is operative, it's going to pluto.
The irony is that LTC does not need or benefit from segwit + LN...
And neither do any of the other 5-6 alts that are working on segwit + LN.
The benefit comes ONLY if Bitcoin adopts BOTH segwit and LN in the future...
In which case LTC will be able to route atomic BTC transactions.
Again, the crazy explosion in segwit + LN alts depends entirely on Bitcoin adopting segwit + LN... someday long away.
None of this is complicated... but > 90% of "crypto enthusiasts" get it wrong
The irony on all of this is the fact that kiklo is one of the couple known anti segwit trollls that spend 24/7 posting segwit FUD, and the only reason that Litecoin is going up is thanks to segwit, because without segwit it would be yet another shitcoin, but now with segwit LTC is going to mars, and when LN is operative, it's going to pluto.
ShitWit has nothing to do with it.
LN is pretty useless on LTC, they don't have any transactions capacity issues to require offchain transactions.
Plus LN will require a banking license in the future, so for most it will be a complete waste of time.
Coinbase direct wallet is all that matters.
Barry Silbert alone can do nothing.he is not even developer. I will never again buy ltc nor use it. fckmthfck!
The irony on all of this is the fact that kiklo is one of the couple known anti segwit trollls that spend 24/7 posting segwit FUD, and the only reason that Litecoin is going up is thanks to segwit, because without segwit it would be yet another shitcoin, but now with segwit LTC is going to mars, and when LN is operative, it's going to pluto.
ShitWit has nothing to do with it.
LN is pretty useless on LTC, they don't have any transactions capacity issues to require offchain transactions.
Plus LN will require a banking license in the future, so for most it will be a complete waste of time.
Coinbase direct wallet is all that matters.
That's an perfect calculation, which makes users understand the potential growth of LTC in comparison to bitcoin. In my personal opinion LTC is preferred only as an trading coin and haven't got other usage similar to bitcoin. This has caused a lacking of popularity, so later on while it gets used similar to bitcoin the living hope on LTC might be experienced by the users. For the same reason we cannot say bitcoin is dying.
Yes it was cool to make some money..Now its over.
I will not use litecoin in my payments..i will pay in ETH and BTC. thats all.
Also all benefits from Segwit is for Bitcoin not Litecoin...Even lighting network is for Bitcoin. litecoin is blockstream sandbox. Blockstream will never get Segwit on Bitcoin. Who will use litecoin without bitcoin on lighting network?
Jump to: