Topic: BTCD is no more - page 382. (Read 1328490 times)

Wow, you certainly spent a whole lot of time putting that together. You should give yourself a big round of applause.

Maybe read the forum to figure out what is up, just like everyone else does. There is a lot of depth to this coin and a lot that has happened and is continuing to happen. People shouldn't need to write you paragraphs explaining what you can find out by just reading a little bit on your own.

If your time is worth so little as to have had enough of it to do your silly little presentation, I have a feeling your "new money" isn't of much consequence.

See ya!

This!
Seriously less than two hours have went by and this guy gets impatient.  We don't need your new money if you are the type that gets upset when you don't get something immediately.

Here it is for those who doesn't read ann page.

Key Features

BitcoinDark is now a PoS coin.  Key Features of the BTCD platform will include the following: a near realtime decentralized exchange (Instantdex), a peer to peer sports book (Privatebet), BTCD => Cash (Anon Debit Card), Completely private and anonymous transactions (Teleport), and More!

Darkpaper

http://www.flipgorilla.com/p/23023990364728535/show#/23023990364728535/0

Nice one.

How old are you btw?

Also lol at the "our coin" stuff. That's so fucking immature.

Seriously? At the minimum you should be reading the Announcement page where both questions are answered rather than searching for gifs to post on the thread. If you can't even put that much effort into your investments you might want to wait before investing.

Bots make the order books hard to read

They will both be official websites and both are still undergoing redesign as well

.org will be the landing page and will be information orientated, while .net will be more function orientated, e.g. login, access multi-pool functions, forum, web wallet..etc.

Which is the official website?  .org or .net?

I will look into web-gui first for now

I sold this coin at only 61k, which was too early, didn't expect it would be so high

I enjoyed it, picked up 14 BTC worth @ 00425, these coins will not be leaving me anytime soon.

I really think BTCD can be the next 10 mil coin.
The chart is one of the most gorgeous looking I have seen in months.

Just needs to finds it's new floor and build some natural buy support walls.
Dev is class A.

So confused to anyone dumping into a massive buy wall. This person is no idiot buying at this price and will drive the BTCD from your weak hands. You're being played and getting out now is just filling someone else's rocket to the moon. You've got everything laid out for you by Our dev and you'd dump at this price? CRAZY! Someone willing to buy XX BTC worth of BTCD at this price obviously has a shit ton more to spend on keeping you out once you sell. Boy would I feel bummed had I sold at .001 and the same goes for now. You're in early if you're in now. This coin has value and real world useage before the end of fall in northern hemi.

I grabbed a bit at 00425

wow this wall on bittrex is causing all kinds of havoc.  inviting people to dump for some insane reason.  Lots of cheap coins to be had at 004x!

multisig is cool! It took me a while to realize that the sending side and receiving side have totally asymmetric characteristics as far as multisig goes. I could have made them the same, but I didnt see any sense in bloating the sending side by up to 254 times. So, a bit of extra checking and making sure I have the valid values for M and N and now it is spitting out N packets. I decided to just encode the most important part, so most of these packets look a lot the same.

sendmessage ([{"requestType":"telepod","crc":3746873616,"i":0,"h":57749,"c":"BTCD","v":"0.10000000","a":"RWk5dDwDW2HYT1gmotEbs4hYzVTa9jsNFP","t":"7026a6e05824e3b0dd4e415f0aa98359fc24753d7191c1d5a8e526fe79f1e5c6","o":1,"p":"76a914eb707c47e64c042bdf6b462e6236d48c24bd697088ac","k":"369df6af7ba6bcd46101e013f167ea335facd9fd4d70c8796a2c795a368e35a2a06b997d9182177 601969342dd37921ef667246c","L":696984545,"s":1,"M":2,"N":3},{"token":"6e199r25jda6plakvkvlsn279b7s5ia917cesr9menejhelvb33346338n134481fflrtlpsnhgtvse 4m4js69djh99ill1677napf52b9rgkm9ul60did64avaqo2ph6srm33bl8t52ikh3lt6jja7eaql0eb 4d"}]) len.581 to 4370196924948076496

The above simple packet turns into:
json_handler returns.(telepod_received from NXT.12927190866050319905 totalcrc.696984545 sharei.0 crc.3746873616 ind.0 height.57749 0.10000000 RWk5dDwDW2HYT1gmotEbs4hYzVTa9jsNFP 7026a6e05824e3b0dd4e415f0aa98359fc24753d7191c1d5a8e526fe79f1e5c6/vout1 (76a914eb707c47e64c042bdf6b462e6236d48c24bd697088ac) priv.(\336X\221,\264B\275ڙLӰ\253\337\270'\306R\362&:\320(\336\302h\352\305IO]\363 \215W\231ܦ\230GE\250X\253\224\241) M.2 N.3)

json_handler returns.(telepod_received from NXT.12927190866050319905 totalcrc.696984545 sharei.1 crc.3746873616 ind.0 height.57749 0.10000000 RWk5dDwDW2HYT1gmotEbs4hYzVTa9jsNFP 7026a6e05824e3b0dd4e415f0aa98359fc24753d7191c1d5a8e526fe79f1e5c6/vout1 (76a914eb707c47e64c042bdf6b462e6236d48c24bd697088ac) priv.(6\235\366\257{\246\274\324a
\340\361g\3523_\254\331\375Mp\310yj,yZ6\2165\242\240k\231}\221\202v
\226\223B\3357\222\366g$l) M.2 N.3)

json_handler returns.(telepod_received from NXT.12927190866050319905 totalcrc.696984545 sharei.2 crc.3746873616 ind.0 height.57749 0.10000000 RWk5dDwDW2HYT1gmotEbs4hYzVTa9jsNFP 7026a6e05824e3b0dd4e415f0aa98359fc24753d7191c1d5a8e526fe79f1e5c6/vout1 (76a914eb707c47e64c042bdf6b462e6236d48c24bd697088ac) priv.(7   \275'\320T\200\367AB\247g\237\362o
\344\235L\347!\270R\365\343RY7\256\364MϴK"\205\276\272A\370\240\204v\341ͽ\237\321n) M.2 N.3)

Notice the stuff inside the priv.(scrambled) is all scrambled for each of these three (0, 1, 2) sharei packets
The really cool magic is that using any two of the three, the original values can be recreated. This is just 2 of 3, imagine 100 of 254 how many packets need to be intercepted. And all this is inside doubly or triply encrypted onion routed packets.

Now, I can debug the receive side and since I already have the this code tested, as long as I have all the data I need, it should just decode as if it was just a 1 of 1 transfer and then it plugs right into the same code. Always best to not have any more code paths than needed, less code to debug! For me this is pretty important as if I am not careful I could just write another 500 lines and then have to debug it.

James

yes, I will send you versions this weekend, at least I hope to

see it this way: more chances to get in for a really good price   

Price is really getting surpressed

I honestly hope my order gets filled @ 400k, might be dreaming, we will see.