Topic: BTCtalk help me (Read 935 times)

Good to see it solved 

I know i know... but community voted like that, not my choice

But this shitcoin introduced more than  500+ fresh young people from Balkan to crypto and basics, in last 5 DAYS!!!

That was my goal, really, not to scam nobody!

no premine, no ico, pure POW with fair start, and we gave so much of our shitcoin you would not belive it!

If im in to scamming people i would not be Live on national TV last night
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bVyzqaxmnUU

Just check our media attention of 5+ years of our work!
https://crypto.ba/c/crypto-ba-ekipa/mediji/49

Sorry wont advertise it here!

Support your views, I have followed you for a long time, and see your efforts to build your community. . . . I will promote your project in the Chinese market. Keep your hard work, list more trading platforms, and build a more transparent and fair community

Because that is a wrong understanding,,,, I also think that Bitcoin is also a scam. . . . Most people in the world think Bitcoin is a scam. So what do you think of this matter? ? ?

Created new shitcoin with your own name and call it community coin  
Sounds like a scam to me, and this topic is used for advertising.

It was solved in 2020... 5 long years i was considered a scammer for this!

I was live on National TV today

Thanks everybody!

Until March 2018 This Problem Didn't Get Resolve?

sure buddy, but my account never did any of signature campaigns, and admins can prove that.

You should provide the information that proves that you are the real owner of the account. If your account did ever joined signature campaigns then you should prove that you hage full control of the address thta used in the campaign but if your account is not used in any sig camps then provide the information that they require to believe that it is yours truly then you kight have a chance that the red tdust may be removed.

We did some quality work on crypto adoption in these parts of world.

And again thank you all for supporting me all these years!

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/--5278812

i removed my flag to VOD, it was over-reacting, my bad.

as sa normal crypto user that is here for more than 8years, i still dont get these rules.

i understand that there must be rules, but flagging someone just because it can... thats just to much

again, im easily losing my will to be here anyway, and i really love btctalk and what it represent, but getting flags like this every time i say something wrong is not ideal

i wish you all best life i will just carry on learning people about blockchain in general but on crypto.ba

hugs and kisses, be good, be positive

@Vod gave you a Neutral feedback really (not a negative feedback – see the colour of the feedback). The rating does therefore not count in the same counter as @Zepher’s. Neutral feedback’s are meant to be more of a comment, than a statement in terms of trust, although any comment on the Trust page is subject to the influence of whomever placed the comment, whatever its nature (Positive, Negative or Neutral), and whether he’s on DT or not.

On the other hand, the flag you’ve created on @Vod is void in principle, since it does not really pinpoint any specific evidence that one may lose money when dealing with @Vod. The reference is generic, pointing to a massive thread, but not concrete on evidence (on risk of losing money).

All in all, that’s why I particularly don’t like the Trust system too much. Call me an idealist, but I still believe it should represent the concept of commerce for the most (ideally all), and often, it goes off-track to represent retaliation, grudges or aspects that have nothing to do with the original intent. For example, my positive trust, which I do appreciate, is not really correct, since it is not based on anything commerce related.

I’d rather much prefer a proper trust system solely for commerce (needs to be rethinked), and a wall for any other type of comments.

Imagine this, some VOD gave me another negative saying  i sold my account

damn this is getting to much

You are an unlucky member of this forum. We have nothing to do but express our sympathy for you. But you can be sure that you are not alone. There are many more like you. A few days ago, a person I knew got a negative trust for a false reason. He could not prove his innocence. When someone gets negative trust, no one believes him.  Rather despises him.

Anyway you are Rux and keep continuing as Rux.

Hello friends, i have been so bussy i totaly forgot this post.

Again, im still Rux and we proved that.

It doesn't really work like that ... See https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.52312354 for further details. There have been changes lately that I specified in the referenced post.

Thanks for infos, now i must find way to get trust

Can creating a crypto community from Balkan, with over 1k members, count as trust?  

if my community members reading this pls go to this link and leave positive feedback

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=105737

There were such cases before also and you can check out this thread:
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/dt-trust-abuse-by-people-here-needs-attention-at-once-before-goes-out-of-hand-5086816

Here in this account it is mentioned the signature about the negative trust. I think similar signature could let people know about the negative feedback reason.

If you get positive trust in future say +2 your total trust will be 1 that is    +2 / =1 / -1. Even one positive trust can neutralise. 

In reality, account does not prove nothing, but its sentimental for me, but truth is that many members are using btctalk accounts to scam many people, so yea, my username would not be used for that.

Heck, not even one sig. campaign, not even one FUD/Scam from this account.

If I have a Legendary account, I would not sold it either because......... Kidding