I traced his IP as well and it points to Quito, Ecuador.
Can we block his IP to stop him from stripmining the coin again?
Topic: [BTE] The Bytecoin Information Thread - page 17. (Read 80193 times)
Not sure it will do much good as like most of us here he is probably using a VPN. I was able to trace the IP where his big ASIC was strip-mining from as most of those big units usually need an Ethernet hard line. Mining with low-hash units is much easier to do with a VPN. What were you using to trace his IP?
I traced his IP as well and it points to Quito, Ecuador.
Can we block his IP to stop him from stripmining the coin again?
I traced his IP as well and it points to Quito, Ecuador.
Can we block his IP to stop him from stripmining the coin again?
I traced his IP as well and it points to Quito, Ecuador.
Can we block his IP to stop him from stripmining the coin again?
I have developed technology to prevent strip-mining. I have done most of the testing that I can do in one shop alone. I have some other tasks, such as how to release a windows client that I need to gain control over. I am not worried about strip mining.
I traced his IP as well and it points to Quito, Ecuador.
Can we block his IP to stop him from stripmining the coin again?
Go to the first page of this thread and search "ahmed_bodi". You will find several messages referencing his unsuccessful attempt to fork BTE so him and his associates could pool-mine the coin faster. Furthermore when the strip-mining was going on, I was able to trace the IP address from which most of the blocks were mined to Vancouver, Canada where Ahmed Bodi is located. No proof that he definitely strip-mined BTE, but it looks very suspicious and he has never denied involvement. Why don't you PM him and ask for yourself?
Can you prove this claim?
Back when this coin was launched Ahmed Bodi (going here with username mrbodz) pointed a big ASIC at BTE and striped-mined a lot coins. PM user ProfMac to get more info on efforts to prevent this .
Is this coin working okay? It looks like it has possibilities except that almost half the coins are in one wallet. Most people pass on monopoly coins.
Can you prove this claim?
Back when this coin was launched Ahmed Bodi (going here with username mrbodz) pointed a big ASIC at BTE and striped-mined a lot coins. PM user ProfMac to get more info on efforts to prevent this .
Is this coin working okay? It looks like it has possibilities except that almost half the coins are in one wallet. Most people pass on monopoly coins.
Can you prove this claim?
The block-chain has multiple instances when blocks were mined every few minutes when the difficulty dropped, then the hash-power was removed after an Interval (2016 blocks). I am not sure off the top of my head how quickly blocks were mined in the interval before the current one, but the chain was clearly abandoned when the difficulty increased. Beyond that, I myself don't care who the strip-miner was.
Back when this coin was launched Ahmed Bodi (going here with username mrbodz) pointed a big ASIC at BTE and striped-mined a lot coins. PM user ProfMac to get more info on efforts to prevent this .
Is this coin working okay? It looks like it has possibilities except that almost half the coins are in one wallet. Most people pass on monopoly coins.
Can you prove this claim?
Back when this coin was launched Ahmed Bodi (going here with username mrbodz) pointed a big ASIC at BTE and striped-mined a lot coins. PM user ProfMac to get more info on efforts to prevent this .
Is this coin working okay? It looks like it has possibilities except that almost half the coins are in one wallet. Most people pass on monopoly coins.
You are probably correct, but the REAL Bytecoin (BTE) started in April, 2013. As the Prof said earlier, can anyone present verifiable proof that the fake bytecoin existed before that?
I think he means BTE
Pardon my density, but what are you talking about? TIA.
yes the one which might be turning into PPS bte.crypto-expert.com (if we go ahead with the move to PPS it will be reallocated to pool.bytecoin.biz everyone will have 1 weeks notice and any unclaimed funds will be moved over to the new pool with their account (passwords will be invalidated then so will need to be reset)
I think he means BTE
Pardon my density, but what are you talking about? TIA.
yes the one which might be turning into PPS bte.crypto-expert.com (if we go ahead with the move to PPS it will be reallocated to pool.bytecoin.biz everyone will have 1 weeks notice and any unclaimed funds will be moved over to the new pool with their account (passwords will be invalidated then so will need to be reset)
I think he means BTE
Pardon my density, but what are you talking about? TIA.
yes the one which might be turning into PPS bte.crypto-expert.com (if we go ahead with the move to PPS it will be reallocated to pool.bytecoin.biz everyone will have 1 weeks notice and any unclaimed funds will be moved over to the new pool with their account (passwords will be invalidated then so will need to be reset)
yes the one which might be turning into PPS bte.crypto-expert.com (if we go ahead with the move to PPS it will be reallocated to pool.bytecoin.biz everyone will have 1 weeks notice and any unclaimed funds will be moved over to the new pool with their account (passwords will be invalidated then so will need to be reset)
Meaning a load on the CPU. My machine has an i7 but I don't use it for mining as things slow down too much.
You mean hard to find coins or hard on the CPU in terms of overheating or something?
Must be hard on the CPU.
You mean hard to find coins or hard on the CPU in terms of overheating or something?
Must be hard on the CPU.
You mean hard to find coins or hard on the CPU in terms of overheating or something?
Any mining counts with BTE. Found any blocks yet? Must be hard on the CPU.
{
"blocks" : 58183,
"currentblocksize" : 1565,
"currentblocktx" : 2,
"difficulty" : 1056741.21450361,
"errors" : "",
"generate" : true, // <--- true if active mining
"genproclimit" : -1,
"hashespersec" : 191345,
"pooledtx" : 2,
"testnet" : false
}
CPU mining if that counts.
Are you mining?
58,464 is the next difficulty adjustment correct?
check here for current block: http://34.233.28.56:3000/ (58,182)
That's only 282 blocks away before adjustment.
Go Miners!
58,464 is the next difficulty adjustment correct?
check here for current block: http://34.233.28.56:3000/ (58,182)
That's only 282 blocks away before adjustment.
Go Miners!
{
"blocks" : 58183,
"currentblocksize" : 1565,
"currentblocktx" : 2,
"difficulty" : 1056741.21450361,
"errors" : "",
"generate" : true, // <--- true if active mining
"genproclimit" : -1,
"hashespersec" : 191345,
"pooledtx" : 2,
"testnet" : false
}
CPU mining if that counts.
Are you mining?
58,464 is the next difficulty adjustment correct?
check here for current block: http://34.233.28.56:3000/ (58,182)
That's only 282 blocks away before adjustment.
Go Miners!
58,464 is the next difficulty adjustment correct?
check here for current block: http://34.233.28.56:3000/ (58,182)
That's only 282 blocks away before adjustment.
Go Miners!
{
"blocks" : 58183,
"currentblocksize" : 1565,
"currentblocktx" : 2,
"difficulty" : 1056741.21450361,
"errors" : "",
"generate" : true, // <--- true if active mining
"genproclimit" : -1,
"hashespersec" : 191345,
"pooledtx" : 2,
"testnet" : false
}
CPU mining if that counts.
This week, I bought a cable modem and a separate router. I flashed OpenWRT onto the router, and spent some time getting a satisfactory initial configuration.
Today, I temporarily switched my upstream from a static IPv4 address to a DHCP IPv4 address, which will change from time to time. My DNS provider does support dynamic IP, so eventually this should work ok. I am still paying for the static IPv4 service, so I can back down if it is unworkable.
Today, and for a while, I am test deploying the DHCP IPv4 configuration. In the moment, the DNS entry for seed.bte.vima.austin.tx.us is updated to the correct value. I made an outgoing connection,
and now I have several incoming connections. I think things are workable, at least until my provider assigns me a new DHCP address.
This is all to save $12 / month cable router rental fee. I probably spent 40 hours on minutia. I don't think this was a fiscally sound move, but I am satisfied.
Today, I temporarily switched my upstream from a static IPv4 address to a DHCP IPv4 address, which will change from time to time. My DNS provider does support dynamic IP, so eventually this should work ok. I am still paying for the static IPv4 service, so I can back down if it is unworkable.
Today, and for a while, I am test deploying the DHCP IPv4 configuration. In the moment, the DNS entry for seed.bte.vima.austin.tx.us is updated to the correct value. I made an outgoing connection,
and now I have several incoming connections. I think things are workable, at least until my provider assigns me a new DHCP address.
This is all to save $12 / month cable router rental fee. I probably spent 40 hours on minutia. I don't think this was a fiscally sound move, but I am satisfied.
Are you mining?
58,464 is the next difficulty adjustment correct?
check here for current block: http://34.233.28.56:3000/ (58,182)
That's only 282 blocks away before adjustment.
Go Miners!
58,464 is the next difficulty adjustment correct?
check here for current block: http://34.233.28.56:3000/ (58,182)
That's only 282 blocks away before adjustment.
Go Miners!
58,464 is the next difficulty adjustment correct?
check here for current block: http://34.233.28.56:3000/ (58,182)
That's only 282 blocks away before adjustment.
Go Miners!
My client has connection to your node, but I can't connec to your faucet link.
May I add this to the DNS lookup for seed.bte.vima.austin.tx.us?
Yes no problem.
Also, I build a faucet that gives out 0.001. Can anyone test if it works?
http://34.233.28.56:3000/faucet/8YourBYTECOINaddressgMCwY3WGVm35EYuA
addnode=34.233.28.56:6333
Need more nodes? Donations accepted! --> 8S5o3zrmdVNz6FPfwtYryuVZR98SXbPeHY
Need more nodes? Donations accepted! --> 8S5o3zrmdVNz6FPfwtYryuVZR98SXbPeHY
May I add this to the DNS lookup for seed.bte.vima.austin.tx.us?
Yes no problem.
Also, I build a faucet that gives out 0.001. Can anyone test if it works?
http://34.233.28.56:3000/faucet/8YourBYTECOINaddressgMCwY3WGVm35EYuA
http://34.233.28.56:3000/faucet/"yourBTEaddress"
example:
http://34.233.28.56:3000/faucet/8BytecoinEaterAddressDontSendf59kuE <-- WARNING: Fake address used for demonstration purposes.
I made a dns entry, faucet.bte.vima.austin.tx.us = 34.233.28.56
It looks like several people have tried the faucet. Let me offer a suggestion. Edit your post above and put a dedicated address into it. Then if someone is careless, no coins are destroyed.
Code:
[
"09742f4f77409a702194b14cb06d198f2b17ebff54a9343037c0cc6cb8dc03d3",
"0c43b4132a24a195805ec4c44993e90ae3e0713db784db1f9470cf965805e35d",
"1a0c4dd54ea3cb95424044a1d97683731d02fbdf04e002872a34194e75f89405",
"1fd1c1cc09f8188db2e6ad96c1f5e684779da7bade0375cbcf34e60b5d4a68e2",
"34d357bf48974738022cb3d78c9cc02b981bc247f2cf7ff75774c8ff2df9bfd8",
"5dca599eeed41b9a9249985595d291c49a8bacce498c66bd83cf027cc1ac16b9",
"7fa4786b4d6dbc846d5b603196e9f64204c673c2f181d5dfddd34a12e55a1600",
"80719b93ef99355d7d1f26d3594251bb76ad4753129f068b6317da21e5c62eb0",
"a853a537941b2e283af7a71c04cc341b27628129605677da75aff785174de9d3",
"ab8771af111c2b1f40d372f475b62b444cf23377381c54192a077130f8dfee09",
"b101c079112bcf746594bdcf5817feb7512f94fa5caf0bb6ec8dd25e60c3fdda",
"ba7396e10d961c66b3fc2c3c93107d448388f72fc910ac9eceae8dac66271eeb",
"c98c8d50e69052075f53e74a219d0b8877c391b8761d198778ef04f276c49c7a",
"c9be6a2a27bb90103044f7a8c4cb941062fdfc6b158e5ab14112f6e7dc746430",
"d52becac8250cd760e4babc892f1de1eaca64eaad30ea6e92983d47e173c1e57",
"f2bfb1215d664856b42fe45b316f725032dc8ade5397ae524d2ddf8a87f8049a",
"f4c1b5f8dcba0e30da0cf0eef654125696d1e5e37a578275390c7ba2a9d88d8a",
"f63b8a8998086d22625be7616c806535bd73b93997d8dde1fd37a2216d82a076"
]
My client has connection to your node, but I can't connec to your faucet link.
May I add this to the DNS lookup for seed.bte.vima.austin.tx.us?
Yes no problem.
Also, I build a faucet that gives out 0.001. Can anyone test if it works?
http://34.233.28.56:3000/faucet/8YourBYTECOINaddressgMCwY3WGVm35EYuA
addnode=34.233.28.56:6333
Need more nodes? Donations accepted! --> 8S5o3zrmdVNz6FPfwtYryuVZR98SXbPeHY
Need more nodes? Donations accepted! --> 8S5o3zrmdVNz6FPfwtYryuVZR98SXbPeHY
May I add this to the DNS lookup for seed.bte.vima.austin.tx.us?
Yes no problem.
Also, I build a faucet that gives out 0.001. Can anyone test if it works?
http://34.233.28.56:3000/faucet/8YourBYTECOINaddressgMCwY3WGVm35EYuA
http://34.233.28.56:3000/faucet/"yourBTEaddress"
example:
http://34.233.28.56:3000/faucet/8BytecoinEaterAddressDontSendf59kuE <-- WARNING: Fake address used for demonstration purposes.
Jump to: