Topic: Bullion (CBX) &#039;the Digital Precious Metal&#039; | 2019 Roadmap published - page 141. (Read 359541 times)

Quote from: Lutzow on May 26, 2016, 12:23:07 PM

Thanks to both of you, I already get past the

sudo apt-get install libdb-dev libdb++-dev

Is it alright to proceed with libdb 4.8? Or do I have to get rid of the previous installation first?

You don't especially have to uninstall it because as I said in my document, when you do the "make" command you will specify the path of libdb4.8, so there can't be a mistake from compiler.

Down to the last step but got this

root@19313:~/CryptoBullion-CBX/src# make -f makefile.unix BDB_INCLUDE_PATH="/usr/local/BerkeleyDB.4.8/include" BDB_LIB_PATH="/usr/local/BerkeleyDB.4.
8/lib"
g++ -c -O2 -pthread -Wall -Wextra -Wformat -Wformat-security -Wno-unused-parameter -g -DBOOST_SPIRIT_THREADSAFE -I/root/CryptoBullion-CBX/src -I/root
/CryptoBullion-CBX/src/obj -I/usr/local/BerkeleyDB.4.8/include -DUSE_UPNP=0 -DUSE_IPV6=1 -I/root/CryptoBullion-CBX/src/leveldb/include -DUSE_LEVELDB
-I/root/CryptoBullion-CBX/src/leveldb/helpers -fno-stack-protector -fstack-protector-all -Wstack-protector -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -msse2 -MMD -MF obj/a
lert.d -o obj/alert.o alert.cpp
alert.cpp:5:29: fatal error: boost/foreach.hpp: No such file or directory
#include

Tried google but was unable to find a workaround. It looks like I need to edit something here, just don't know what. Thanks in advance.

Was able to get past the previous step, some missing stuff still in my debian that's why it didn't work.
This one though is the new problem

collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status
makefile.unix:190: recipe for target 'cryptobulliond' failed
make: *** [cryptobulliond] Error 1

tried the all three below
make -f makefile.unix "USE_UPNP=-"
make -f makefile.unix
make -f makefile.unix BDB_INCLUDE_PATH="/usr/local/BerkeleyDB.4.8/include" BDB_LIB_PATH="/usr/local/BerkeleyDB.4.8/lib"

What did I miss this time?

Thanks in advance

Please send me the complete error by PM

Alex4J

member

Activity: 92

Merit: 13

Quote from: Lutzow on May 26, 2016, 12:23:07 PM

Thanks to both of you, I already get past the

sudo apt-get install libdb-dev libdb++-dev

Is it alright to proceed with libdb 4.8? Or do I have to get rid of the previous installation first?

You don't especially have to uninstall it because as I said in my document, when you do the "make" command you will specify the path of libdb4.8, so there can't be a mistake from compiler.

Down to the last step but got this

root@19313:~/CryptoBullion-CBX/src# make -f makefile.unix BDB_INCLUDE_PATH="/usr/local/BerkeleyDB.4.8/include" BDB_LIB_PATH="/usr/local/BerkeleyDB.4.
8/lib"
g++ -c -O2 -pthread -Wall -Wextra -Wformat -Wformat-security -Wno-unused-parameter -g -DBOOST_SPIRIT_THREADSAFE -I/root/CryptoBullion-CBX/src -I/root
/CryptoBullion-CBX/src/obj -I/usr/local/BerkeleyDB.4.8/include -DUSE_UPNP=0 -DUSE_IPV6=1 -I/root/CryptoBullion-CBX/src/leveldb/include -DUSE_LEVELDB
-I/root/CryptoBullion-CBX/src/leveldb/helpers -fno-stack-protector -fstack-protector-all -Wstack-protector -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -msse2 -MMD -MF obj/a
lert.d -o obj/alert.o alert.cpp
alert.cpp:5:29: fatal error: boost/foreach.hpp: No such file or directory
#include

Tried google but was unable to find a workaround. It looks like I need to edit something here, just don't know what. Thanks in advance.

You don't have the required library since last time you tried to install it doesn't work cause of libdb, just run that:

Code:

sudo apt-get install build-essential libtool autotools-dev autoconf pkg-config libssl-dev libevent-dev libboost-all-dev

Then compile

Lutzow

hero member

Activity: 728

Merit: 500

Quote from: elambert on May 25, 2016, 09:00:31 AM

Thanks to both of you, I already get past the

sudo apt-get install libdb-dev libdb++-dev

Is it alright to proceed with libdb 4.8? Or do I have to get rid of the previous installation first?

You don't especially have to uninstall it because as I said in my document, when you do the "make" command you will specify the path of libdb4.8, so there can't be a mistake from compiler.

Down to the last step but got this

root@19313:~/CryptoBullion-CBX/src# make -f makefile.unix BDB_INCLUDE_PATH="/usr/local/BerkeleyDB.4.8/include" BDB_LIB_PATH="/usr/local/BerkeleyDB.4.
8/lib"
g++ -c -O2 -pthread -Wall -Wextra -Wformat -Wformat-security -Wno-unused-parameter -g -DBOOST_SPIRIT_THREADSAFE -I/root/CryptoBullion-CBX/src -I/root
/CryptoBullion-CBX/src/obj -I/usr/local/BerkeleyDB.4.8/include -DUSE_UPNP=0 -DUSE_IPV6=1 -I/root/CryptoBullion-CBX/src/leveldb/include -DUSE_LEVELDB
-I/root/CryptoBullion-CBX/src/leveldb/helpers -fno-stack-protector -fstack-protector-all -Wstack-protector -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -msse2 -MMD -MF obj/a
lert.d -o obj/alert.o alert.cpp
alert.cpp:5:29: fatal error: boost/foreach.hpp: No such file or directory
#include

Tried google but was unable to find a workaround. It looks like I need to edit something here, just don't know what. Thanks in advance.

Was able to get past the previous step, some missing stuff still in my debian that's why it didn't work.
This one though is the new problem

collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status
makefile.unix:190: recipe for target 'cryptobulliond' failed
make: *** [cryptobulliond] Error 1

tried the all three below
make -f makefile.unix "USE_UPNP=-"
make -f makefile.unix
make -f makefile.unix BDB_INCLUDE_PATH="/usr/local/BerkeleyDB.4.8/include" BDB_LIB_PATH="/usr/local/BerkeleyDB.4.8/lib"

What did I miss this time?

Thanks in advance

Dekker3D

sr. member

Activity: 434

Merit: 250

★YoBit.Net★ 350+ Coins Exchange & Dice

We're 33 in Ccex ranking, slowly we're climbing. Will send 1 or 2 votes tonight as well.

cryptohunter

legendary

Activity: 2100

Merit: 1167

MY RED TRUST LEFT BY SCUMBAGS - READ MY SIG

Quote

I would like to know why posp is better than pos3 (black) if this could clearly be explained I think cgb will get a lot more attention.

I have asked many people this question many times and yet have not had a clear cut answer. I have quite a bit of cgb from ages back and have always like this coin a lot.

Are you (elambert) the creator of posp? can posp work with full POS and not just POS+POW? I wonder already why more coins are not switching to this posp and are all using pos3?

Hi cryptohunter. I do not know much about blackcoin and their pos3 but I do hear that it is similar. I would have to study it to learn the nuances but I don't know. Being a higher ranked market cap coin allows blackcoin to be visible to a far larger audience than CBX so they would be more likely to be cloned. Their implementation of PoS was the first (per my understanding) to do away with coinage. We improved on the removal of coinage design by implementing a static reward so as to only reward those staking their coins and securing the network while inactive coin owners forfeited their stake to the active stakers.

I wrote the white paper on PoSP and came up with the concept but Alex4J implemented it into CBX. PoSP is full PoS, there is no PoW in use. When we implemented PoSP, we did away with PoW altogether.

We have tried but we are still battling to let people know about PoSP. The majority doesnt know we have it and a good portion of those who know we have it, dont understand what it is. So.... I think a short video would be instrumental in not only educating current CBX owners, but also the rest of the world.

Thanks for the reply. I am still looking into them both POSP and pos3 look like the best POS variations by far.

Dekker3D

sr. member

Activity: 434

Merit: 250

★YoBit.Net★ 350+ Coins Exchange & Dice

Quote from: BitMaxz on May 27, 2016, 02:08:41 AM

Quote from: Dekker3D on May 27, 2016, 12:44:17 AM

Quote from: IMZ on May 26, 2016, 11:45:48 PM

Quote from: m33 on May 27, 2016, 03:30:29 AM

Can someone shoot me a PM explaining the wallbusters promo.
Looking to invest here, like what I see.

here are the informations about the WBIP

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.14234456

Thanks for that. The wall at 0.0006 is not really there anymore so not sure if this is still in play.

Sure, this program (WBIP) continues until we bust through .0006 - which indeed appears much easier to do, now that some sellers lost patience and dumped Wink

is that means that we are near to move forward mate? as you mention that many dumpers already dump their coin so which means your project is now moving up and how long we need to wait to make it to the point where you can say it was a success to our community? just curios question mate. thanks.

Morning, Golftech. It's hard to say when the WBIP will be 'finished'; but it's working! If you look at the buy-sell order books and the recent trading data, you'll see great volume, a much tighter buy-sell spread -- less than 5% at this second -- and fewer sell-orders hanging over our head. Please feel free to wade in and do a little trading yourself: a currency gotta have volume!

Mark

Yes, we only need a couple of BTC to get past that price plus we're getting some volumes as well despite Lisk being a hot coin right now.

I think there's no funds support or reserve to control the volume of the market.. i saw the price if cbx right now in cryptopia and i think cbx campaign is has a bad result but if you are paying it in bitcoin people joined in campaign they can not dump their cbx.. because they are receiving it in bitcoin..
I am one of the supporters of cbx but i notice after starting a campaign paying with cbx daily more people are dumping in cryptopia..

Paying it in CBX though even when dumped into the exchange still creates popularity into the coin and the campaign to 60k is also lower than before. I guess, Vonspass is hoping that those who are collecting from the campaign can use their CBX to jumpstart their holdings. I guess, not all of them are selling them in exchange, some are saving them for staking use. Also, having the payment in CBX allows more installation of vaults compared to if those are being paid in BTC.

BTCat

legendary

Activity: 1960

Merit: 1010

Hello guys has the signature campaign ended?

You can read the OP here: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/crypto-bullion-cbx-signature-campaign-1466191

m33

legendary

Activity: 1064

Merit: 1000

Never invest with borrowed coins

Hello guys has the signature campaign ended?

Caladonian

hero member

Activity: 1302

Merit: 540

if helping to gain popularity doing the campaign helps the awareness but you are correct getting cbx for free would be easy for dumpers to dump right away and the price won't go up, I think limiting participants and re create the plan of that campaign would be needed I'm just new here and I keep checking this promising coin.

BitMaxz

legendary

Activity: 3472

Merit: 3217

Happy New year 🤗

Quote from: Dekker3D on May 27, 2016, 12:44:17 AM

Quote from: IMZ on May 26, 2016, 11:45:48 PM

Quote from: IMZ on May 26, 2016, 11:45:48 PM

Can someone shoot me a PM explaining the wallbusters promo.
Looking to invest here, like what I see.

here are the informations about the WBIP

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.14234456

Thanks for that. The wall at 0.0006 is not really there anymore so not sure if this is still in play.

Sure, this program (WBIP) continues until we bust through .0006 - which indeed appears much easier to do, now that some sellers lost patience and dumped Wink

is that means that we are near to move forward mate? as you mention that many dumpers already dump their coin so which means your project is now moving up and how long we need to wait to make it to the point where you can say it was a success to our community? just curios question mate. thanks.

Morning, Golftech. It's hard to say when the WBIP will be 'finished'; but it's working! If you look at the buy-sell order books and the recent trading data, you'll see great volume, a much tighter buy-sell spread -- less than 5% at this second -- and fewer sell-orders hanging over our head. Please feel free to wade in and do a little trading yourself: a currency gotta have volume!

Mark

Yes, we only need a couple of BTC to get past that price plus we're getting some volumes as well despite Lisk being a hot coin right now.

I think there's no funds support or reserve to control the volume of the market.. i saw the price if cbx right now in cryptopia and i think cbx campaign is has a bad result but if you are paying it in bitcoin people joined in campaign they can not dump their cbx.. because they are receiving it in bitcoin..
I am one of the supporters of cbx but i notice after starting a campaign paying with cbx daily more people are dumping in cryptopia..

Dekker3D

sr. member

Activity: 434

Merit: 250

★YoBit.Net★ 350+ Coins Exchange & Dice

Can someone shoot me a PM explaining the wallbusters promo.
Looking to invest here, like what I see.

here are the informations about the WBIP

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.14234456

Thanks for that. The wall at 0.0006 is not really there anymore so not sure if this is still in play.

Sure, this program (WBIP) continues until we bust through .0006 - which indeed appears much easier to do, now that some sellers lost patience and dumped Wink

is that means that we are near to move forward mate? as you mention that many dumpers already dump their coin so which means your project is now moving up and how long we need to wait to make it to the point where you can say it was a success to our community? just curios question mate. thanks.

Morning, Golftech. It's hard to say when the WBIP will be 'finished'; but it's working! If you look at the buy-sell order books and the recent trading data, you'll see great volume, a much tighter buy-sell spread -- less than 5% at this second -- and fewer sell-orders hanging over our head. Please feel free to wade in and do a little trading yourself: a currency gotta have volume!

Mark

Yes, we only need a couple of BTC to get past that price plus we're getting some volumes as well despite Lisk being a hot coin right now.

IMZ

legendary

Activity: 1498

Merit: 1000

Can someone shoot me a PM explaining the wallbusters promo.
Looking to invest here, like what I see.

here are the informations about the WBIP

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.14234456

Thanks for that. The wall at 0.0006 is not really there anymore so not sure if this is still in play.

Sure, this program (WBIP) continues until we bust through .0006 - which indeed appears much easier to do, now that some sellers lost patience and dumped Wink

is that means that we are near to move forward mate? as you mention that many dumpers already dump their coin so which means your project is now moving up and how long we need to wait to make it to the point where you can say it was a success to our community? just curios question mate. thanks.

Morning, Golftech. It's hard to say when the WBIP will be 'finished'; but it's working! If you look at the buy-sell order books and the recent trading data, you'll see great volume, a much tighter buy-sell spread -- less than 5% at this second -- and fewer sell-orders hanging over our head. Please feel free to wade in and do a little trading yourself: a currency gotta have volume!

Mark

Lutzow

hero member

Activity: 728

Merit: 500

Quote from: Dekker3D on May 26, 2016, 10:35:14 AM

Thanks to both of you, I already get past the

sudo apt-get install libdb-dev libdb++-dev

Is it alright to proceed with libdb 4.8? Or do I have to get rid of the previous installation first?

You don't especially have to uninstall it because as I said in my document, when you do the "make" command you will specify the path of libdb4.8, so there can't be a mistake from compiler.

Down to the last step but got this

root@19313:~/CryptoBullion-CBX/src# make -f makefile.unix BDB_INCLUDE_PATH="/usr/local/BerkeleyDB.4.8/include" BDB_LIB_PATH="/usr/local/BerkeleyDB.4.
8/lib"
g++ -c -O2 -pthread -Wall -Wextra -Wformat -Wformat-security -Wno-unused-parameter -g -DBOOST_SPIRIT_THREADSAFE -I/root/CryptoBullion-CBX/src -I/root
/CryptoBullion-CBX/src/obj -I/usr/local/BerkeleyDB.4.8/include -DUSE_UPNP=0 -DUSE_IPV6=1 -I/root/CryptoBullion-CBX/src/leveldb/include -DUSE_LEVELDB
-I/root/CryptoBullion-CBX/src/leveldb/helpers -fno-stack-protector -fstack-protector-all -Wstack-protector -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -msse2 -MMD -MF obj/a
lert.d -o obj/alert.o alert.cpp
alert.cpp:5:29: fatal error: boost/foreach.hpp: No such file or directory
#include

Tried google but was unable to find a workaround. It looks like I need to edit something here, just don't know what. Thanks in advance.

robelneo

legendary

Activity: 3416

Merit: 1225

Enjoy 500% bonus + 70 FS

Quote from: robelneo on May 26, 2016, 09:28:26 AM

Just cast my vote on CCEX I am the 43th voter it's still a long way to go i think it will take a few more weeks to get there we need CCCEX for this there are traders who prefer this trading flat form and they seldom go out of other flat forms ..

Thanks, once we get close enough many others will help in sending their vote to CBX direction.

But we need to remember once we get listed there we should have an active trading there CCEX are delisting coins that has very low trading volume,i have voted coins that was delisted because of very low trading volume

Dekker3D

sr. member

Activity: 434

Merit: 250

★YoBit.Net★ 350+ Coins Exchange & Dice

Quote from: robelneo on May 26, 2016, 09:28:26 AM

Just cast my vote on CCEX I am the 43th voter it's still a long way to go i think it will take a few more weeks to get there we need CCCEX for this there are traders who prefer this trading flat form and they seldom go out of other flat forms ..

Thanks, once we get close enough many others will help in sending their vote to CBX direction.

robelneo

legendary

Activity: 3416

Merit: 1225

Enjoy 500% bonus + 70 FS

Just cast my vote on CCEX I am the 43th voter it's still a long way to go i think it will take a few more weeks to get there we need CCCEX for this there are traders who prefer this trading flat form and they seldom go out of other flat forms ..

Alex4J

member

Activity: 92

Merit: 13