So, lets imagine that I back 10 CBX with 1 Oz of fine silver and you back 1 CBX with 5 Oz of fine silver.
11 CBX is now backed by 6 Oz of fine silver having a value of x in whatever currency.
Now factor in many other individuals doing the very same thing and backing CBX using varying quantities of gold, silver, platinum, palladium, nickle and copper - coins and bars etc., all being publically verifiable.
x number of CBX is now backed by x worth of fully decentralized physical bullion.
The provision of goods and services (as well as exchange platforms) helped to build and establish the bitcoin economy.
Being rarer than bitcoin and presenting itself as a 'store-of-value, CBX as asset based commodity money should seek to establish seperate and additonal price discovery through other means.
Hi BitcoinFX! I still have some of your USBs...
I like your idea but curious how this really would work to add value to my CBX and my precious metals? The public announcement to tie 2 of these together would not be enforceable and could be easily broken correct?
Hey FiniteByDesign! I'll send you a PM.
Glad that you like this concept.
The best way to look at this in terms of adding value I think is to recognize that any participating entity must hold both CBX and precious metal. Both of these things probably being a very good idea in principal and in practice.
Being a cryptographically signed message and therefore verifiable on the blockchain, manual or automated verification that the CBX holding still remains is ofc possible via a block explorer. So, if the amount of CBX for the public address is ever spent below the represented amount then the individual 'backing' can be considered to be divested and is delisted from the spread sheet and/or blockchain / application database.
One of the only potential issues with this is double or multiple representation of an individual bullion holding against multiple CBX addresses. However, holdings could be represented in to two or more categories i.e. certificated (numbered) proof-of-bullion vs non-certificated (proof-of-weight) etc.,
Whilst most economists would probably argue that this issue presents us with a quandry not disimilar to that of Gresham's law -
https://wikipedia.org/wiki/Gresham's_law - remember that this is being proposed only on a fully decentralized basis.
As described in social sciences the proposed action of backing our own CBX is with individual 'agency' -
https://wikipedia.org/wiki/Structure_and_agency - "Agency is the capacity of individuals to act independently and to make their own free choices."
Furthermore, within a free market it is equally important not to set the ratio of CBX to x precious metal, but to leave this action up to the individual to determine for themselves.
CBX is an intangible asset -
https://wikipedia.org/wiki/Intangible_assetBullion (precious metal) is a tangible asset -
https://wikipedia.org/wiki/Tangible_propertyWe are presenting a way to combine Representitive Money -
https://wikipedia.org/wiki/Representative_money and Commodity Money -
https://wikipedia.org/wiki/Commodity_money together.
Thus, creating a fully decentralized Store of
Value Network on top of the existing Crypto Bullion blockchain.
The data derived from this action would essentially allow anyone to do
Value Network Analysis and Value Conversion of Tangible and Intangible Assets -
http://www.vernaallee.com/images/VAA-VNAandValueConversionJIT.pdf - 'on the blockchain'.
...
The referenced passage from The Frogs is as follows (usually dated at 405 BC).
" The course our city runs is the same towards men and money.
She has true and worthy sons.
She has fine new gold and ancient silver,
Coins untouched with alloys, gold or silver,
Each well minted, tested each and ringing clear.
Yet we never use them!
Others pass from hand to hand,
Sorry brass just struck last week and branded with a wretched brand.
So with men we know for upright, blameless lives and noble names.
These we spurn for men of brass... "