Pages:
Author

Topic: bustabit – The original crash game - page 73. (Read 61178 times)

legendary
Activity: 3472
Merit: 1724
November 07, 2019, 09:41:52 PM
Within a month I’ve been trying to develop a strategy for earning money on BaB, but nothing good has come of it. It turns out to make an algorithm that can work 5 hours bringing a plus, then 5 hours nothing, and then go to minus, this is the best script I have made. If anyone knows the grail, give a hint where to dig.

Invest in the site's bankroll or start your own site if you have the means, i.e. stop gambling, these are your moneymaking grails.
jr. member
Activity: 46
Merit: 11
November 07, 2019, 02:40:44 PM
RPS is very easy to make provably fair. In fact I do it all the time. Here's a good example of me playing in a provably fair way (for both of us) just using this forum: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/rock-paper-scissors-boursy-vs-me-challenge-3-btc-1588904 and includes a lot of explanation of how it works
I didn't know RPS could be provably fair, that makes things a lot easier to add in a game. I would really love to make a website with provably fair RPS in it, you wouldn't need any bankroll at all, just make people gamble against each other in a provably fair method and you would make money from rake instead of spending any money yourself.

However, there would be development+design+marketing costs and as a person who has less than 5k dollars in bank account all I can offer would be cheap third world development+design and wouldn't be a good job done for that amount of money and on top of that I wouldn't have enough to market it.

People think when you can code a casino the job is done, that is literally just step one of creating a website bustabit didn't became bustabit in one day.

We've actually got a RPS mode on our site releasing soon.
However we're still considering the best way to approach it, as it's only truly Provably fair for the joiner, not the creator.
In theory the casino could still know what side to chose if someone were to make a game, the only way to combat this is having the user submit the hash themselves.
So you're sacrificing user experience and introducing a lot of human error into the mix, versus just having a warning that states it's only provably fair for the joiner, not the creator of the game.
legendary
Activity: 3318
Merit: 1128
November 07, 2019, 02:04:28 PM
RPS is very easy to make provably fair. In fact I do it all the time. Here's a good example of me playing in a provably fair way (for both of us) just using this forum: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/rock-paper-scissors-boursy-vs-me-challenge-3-btc-1588904 and includes a lot of explanation of how it works
I didn't know RPS could be provably fair, that makes things a lot easier to add in a game. I would really love to make a website with provably fair RPS in it, you wouldn't need any bankroll at all, just make people gamble against each other in a provably fair method and you would make money from rake instead of spending any money yourself.

However, there would be development+design+marketing costs and as a person who has less than 5k dollars in bank account all I can offer would be cheap third world development+design and wouldn't be a good job done for that amount of money and on top of that I wouldn't have enough to market it.

People think when you can code a casino the job is done, that is literally just step one of creating a website bustabit didn't became bustabit in one day.
newbie
Activity: 6
Merit: 6
November 07, 2019, 01:44:32 PM
Everything your asking about is the Terms of Service or can be deduced by perusing it: https://www.bustabit.com/tos



Ah, thanks. Curacao, interesting.
legendary
Activity: 2296
Merit: 2721
Enjoy 500% bonus + 70 FS
November 07, 2019, 01:22:30 PM
So the bustabit bankroll seems like an interesting place to potentially park some BTC. I'd like to understand the regulatory risks, by which I mean the risk that assets invested with bustabit are seized by authorities. No information about this is really provided on the site. What country is bustabit run from and does it have whatever licenses etc are required to run an online gambling enterprise?
It is like parking your coins at exchanges. You dont have the private key of the wallet at the exchange/gambling site/... so technically those coins are not "yours" anymore. Of course there is a risk that the site gets seized or the exchange gets hacked and you lose your coins, if that happens no terms of service or promise can guarantee that you will get your coins back.
full member
Activity: 211
Merit: 100
gamblingsitefinder.com
November 07, 2019, 01:03:21 PM
PredictableLegacy now has a Twitter and Twitch account.

Twitter: @PredictableLeg

Twitch: @PredictableGames
legendary
Activity: 1463
Merit: 1886
November 07, 2019, 12:07:11 PM
What country is bustabit run from and does it have whatever licenses etc are required to run an online gambling enterprise?

In the bottom-right of the homepage it has some info about license/incorporation in Curacao
legendary
Activity: 3472
Merit: 1724
November 07, 2019, 12:06:44 PM
Everything your asking about is the Terms of Service or can be deduced by perusing it: https://www.bustabit.com/tos

newbie
Activity: 6
Merit: 6
November 07, 2019, 11:07:33 AM
So the bustabit bankroll seems like an interesting place to potentially park some BTC. I'd like to understand the regulatory risks, by which I mean the risk that assets invested with bustabit are seized by authorities. No information about this is really provided on the site. What country is bustabit run from and does it have whatever licenses etc are required to run an online gambling enterprise?
full member
Activity: 211
Merit: 100
gamblingsitefinder.com
November 07, 2019, 05:11:56 AM
Sorry for getting off-topic, but RPS is very easy to make provably fair. In fact I do it all the time. Here's a good example of me playing in a provably fair way (for both of us) just using this forum: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/rock-paper-scissors-boursy-vs-me-challenge-3-btc-1588904 and includes a lot of explanation of how it works

Disclaimer: I'm down like 15 BTC net Sad Fuck RPS

What a rollercoaster that thread was. Poor zirt!
hero member
Activity: 826
Merit: 501
November 07, 2019, 03:42:26 AM
Within a month I’ve been trying to develop a strategy for earning money on BaB, but nothing good has come of it. It turns out to make an algorithm that can work 5 hours bringing a plus, then 5 hours nothing, and then go to minus, this is the best script I have made. If anyone knows the grail, give a hint where to dig.
hero member
Activity: 2562
Merit: 586
November 07, 2019, 03:41:16 AM
I still think non-cheatable systems have a sweet spot. Sometimes you want to stop people from cheating, but sometimes you overdo it and make regular gamblers gamble the way they don't want to. Just exactly as the double spending issue where if you do not make one confirmation a must there could be double spenders but if you do then impulse gamblers may lose hype.

Same here where you are both keeping the bots and all at bay with these methods but also you are making it harder for gamblers to gamble the way they like. At the end of the day this is a very professional website, I know it looks like only devans is working on it (and I am sure he does everything or most things) that doesn't mean it doesn't feel like a whole corporation the way they professionally take care of everything.
legendary
Activity: 1463
Merit: 1886
November 06, 2019, 11:23:41 AM
The problem with rock paper scissors (and poker for that matter) is that you don't know if the person you are playing against is another human (or bot) or are you playing against the house who can see your hand. You don't know if your hand is known to other person or not, it is not provably fair at all so at the end of the day you are not sure if you are being scammed or not.

Sorry for getting off-topic, but RPS is very easy to make provably fair. In fact I do it all the time. Here's a good example of me playing in a provably fair way (for both of us) just using this forum: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/rock-paper-scissors-boursy-vs-me-challenge-3-btc-1588904 and includes a lot of explanation of how it works

Disclaimer: I'm down like 15 BTC net Sad Fuck RPS


full member
Activity: 1638
Merit: 122
November 06, 2019, 09:20:39 AM
Gambit used to have rock paper scissors... it wasn't provably fair or anything though.

Pretty sure I hold the record for winning the most BTC in a single match (5 or 10 BTC or something).

It was fun/stupid.  I'd do it again though.
The problem with rock paper scissors (and poker for that matter) is that you don't know if the person you are playing against is another human (or bot) or are you playing against the house who can see your hand. You don't know if your hand is known to other person or not, it is not provably fair at all so at the end of the day you are not sure if you are being scammed or not. Even if the website is as legit as it gets, there is no written proof of it so you are still unsure about what you are doing and if the other person knows it.

Bustabit is one of the most trustworthy websites out there in the crypto world and I would still be skeptical about playing in a place with no provably fair rock paper scissors, maybe for fun but definitely not to win because there is no house edge (maybe rake) in there so you could actually profit but without provably fair I still wouldn't dream about profiting.

provably fair word is available on every gambling site , you can see that in thier homepage when you access them or on thier tagline/promotion  . they also provide tools to verify if they are really have a provably fair or not , you can check that your self but if you feel that there is something not right , you can always report them or leave them   .  bustabit is one of those trusted sites and i wont worry playing on them without the need of doing the above process
legendary
Activity: 2338
Merit: 1124
November 06, 2019, 09:04:32 AM
Gambit used to have rock paper scissors... it wasn't provably fair or anything though.

Pretty sure I hold the record for winning the most BTC in a single match (5 or 10 BTC or something).

It was fun/stupid.  I'd do it again though.
The problem with rock paper scissors (and poker for that matter) is that you don't know if the person you are playing against is another human (or bot) or are you playing against the house who can see your hand. You don't know if your hand is known to other person or not, it is not provably fair at all so at the end of the day you are not sure if you are being scammed or not. Even if the website is as legit as it gets, there is no written proof of it so you are still unsure about what you are doing and if the other person knows it.

Bustabit is one of the most trustworthy websites out there in the crypto world and I would still be skeptical about playing in a place with no provably fair rock paper scissors, maybe for fun but definitely not to win because there is no house edge (maybe rake) in there so you could actually profit but without provably fair I still wouldn't dream about profiting.
sr. member
Activity: 528
Merit: 368
November 06, 2019, 02:42:34 AM
I have one problem with the site. After some indefinite time after loading (reloading) the page it is just gray, while gray fill can be seen that in the background the site managed to load. Clearing the cache helps, but script settings fly along with it. Is there any way to avoid this? I use the Google browser.

I deployed a fix for that issue yesterday. Please let me know if you continue to encounter any problems connecting to bustabit.
newbie
Activity: 6
Merit: 6
November 05, 2019, 01:36:12 PM
And just curious...if bots were the problem why not just disable the scripting system?

It'd be a good solution if it worked. But in reality i think it'd be be a nightmare. Disabling the scripting system itself would really do nothing (advanced bot writers can easily hookin without an official API easily). So you'd basically have to constantly be finding bots and banning them. It'd be an arms race that you'd always be on the losing end of, I think.

At least personally, I prefer the idea of games where you say "do what ever you want, there's no such thing as cheating". Although I know poker sites have a cheatable game, and most of the popular ones seem to do a good job at policing it.

I do think there's a big market for a very pvp oriented version of bustabit. At least that way players would no longer be ignoring the bonuses, so bots wouldn't have such an easy time raking it in.

I figured as much. It did end up self-regulating a bit in the end...it became very hard to snipe bonuses once others (bots) were trying to do the same. Agreed that it's best to go all or nothing in terms of what's allowed.
legendary
Activity: 2296
Merit: 2721
Enjoy 500% bonus + 70 FS
November 05, 2019, 01:02:53 PM
And just curious...if bots were the problem why not just disable the scripting system?
It'd be a good solution if it worked. But in reality i think it'd be be a nightmare. Disabling the scripting system itself would really do nothing (advanced bot writers can easily hookin without an official API easily). So you'd basically have to constantly be finding bots and banning them. It'd be an arms race that you'd always be on the losing end of, I think.

You are right, it's simply not possible. Just take a look at eg. Tampermonkey. It is a browser-plugin which supports writing code which in the end simulates user inputs (putting text into text editors, clicking buttons, following links, ...). A site has simply no chance to detect if a user input originates from a "real user" or from a bot. Taking any actions against such scripts has a high probability of false-positives leading to the fact that you ban real users which you wrongly identified as bots.
legendary
Activity: 1463
Merit: 1886
November 05, 2019, 12:18:54 PM
And just curious...if bots were the problem why not just disable the scripting system?

It'd be a good solution if it worked. But in reality i think it'd be be a nightmare. Disabling the scripting system itself would really do nothing (advanced bot writers can easily hookin without an official API easily). So you'd basically have to constantly be finding bots and banning them. It'd be an arms race that you'd always be on the losing end of, I think.

At least personally, I prefer the idea of games where you say "do what ever you want, there's no such thing as cheating". Although I know poker sites have a cheatable game, and most of the popular ones seem to do a good job at policing it.

I do think there's a big market for a very pvp oriented version of bustabit. At least that way players would no longer be ignoring the bonuses, so bots wouldn't have such an easy time raking it in.
full member
Activity: 211
Merit: 100
gamblingsitefinder.com
November 05, 2019, 10:21:34 AM
But you're probably not far from breaking even right? I'm guessing no more than several weeks away assuming most of what you invested was 3 months ago. At least bustabit has enough volume, on bustadice it takes longer to pay off the dilution fee.

In the time since I began promoting Bustabit, the house has basically been at the mercy of whales such as PredictableLegacy and EasternUnion. Without them, the needle doesn't appear to move unless you really zoom out on the graph. The house is not down much at all over the past quarter, but it's still in the red; certainly not rigged in the house's favor like some users seem to suggest. But at the end of the day, the sample size is far too small to complain. I'm excited to see where we'll be in the next few years with this site.
Pages:
Jump to: