Really like..
Easy to win and easy to lose
Topic: bustabit.com -- The Social Gambling Game - page 82. (Read 293938 times)
This really fuckin fun game
Really like..
Easy to win and easy to lose
Really like..
Easy to win and easy to lose
these 4 lines cleaned up the playmoney lingo to call a bitcoin a bitcoin
Code:
var bbs = document.getElementsByClassName("balance-bits");
var b = document.getElementById("balance_bits");
for (var i=0;i
}
var stickies = document.getElementsByClassName("sticky");
for (var i=0;i
stickies[i].innerHTML="μBTC";
}
I find your use of the overloaded term "4" to be very confusing. We already have a metric term "10" for that number of lines. I don't see any need for you to reuse an existing number for this purpose.
If you know how to use a calculator, here's some buttons you can press to convert from sed numbers to regular people numbers:
Code:
* 2.5 =
Please update your post to give us an option to decide which number system to use. It's clearly trivial as shown in the above list of calculator buttons.
Superfunny, I'm not sure how sed called that 4 lines (even if we collapse the two if lines, we'd get 9; even if we collapse the two for loops we'd get 6). This is one of the funniest posts I've seen in a while. Can't wait to see if sed wants to defend his numbering system
these 4 lines cleaned up the playmoney lingo to call a bitcoin a bitcoin
Code:
var bbs = document.getElementsByClassName("balance-bits");
var b = document.getElementById("balance_bits");
for (var i=0;i
}
var stickies = document.getElementsByClassName("sticky");
for (var i=0;i
stickies[i].innerHTML="μBTC";
}
I find your use of the overloaded term "4" to be very confusing. We already have a metric term "10" for that number of lines. I don't see any need for you to reuse an existing number for this purpose.
If you know how to use a calculator, here's some buttons you can press to convert from sed numbers to regular people numbers:
Code:
* 2.5 =
Please update your post to give us an option to decide which number system to use. It's clearly trivial as shown in the above list of calculator buttons.
I finally tried it. The animation is pretty neat. I worked pretty good for me in chromium. However, in firefox it just froze up.
I thought someone said I could change "bits" to satoshis somewhere in the interface. I couldn't find it though. The "bits" thing makes it seem like play money or some new altcoin.
Also, I ended up with 0.51 "bits" which I think is 51 satoshis. Can I gift this to someone on the site somehow? Is there a tipping mechanism? It seems like 100Sat is the smallest amount you're allowed to bet.
I thought someone said I could change "bits" to satoshis somewhere in the interface. I couldn't find it though. The "bits" thing makes it seem like play money or some new altcoin.
Also, I ended up with 0.51 "bits" which I think is 51 satoshis. Can I gift this to someone on the site somehow? Is there a tipping mechanism? It seems like 100Sat is the smallest amount you're allowed to bet.
no tipping mechanism yet in moneypot as it will encourage begging in chat , and also you can use shiba for the calculation to satoshi, although i forgot the command, it will be wise for ryan to actually add a FAQ list for shiba's command
FYI 1 bits = 100 satoshis
Yes, yes, I know what a "bit" is said to equal. I'm not wanting to go down that road again (it seems like 20% of this thread has been dedicated to fights about "bits"). I just thought that there was an option in the UI to make it say something normal like Satoshis or uBTC. It's all good, I must have misunderstood.
Like I said, the animation was pretty neat.
Assuming you know how to make your browser run some custom javascript on a particular site/page, then you can save the following as a file and it finally fixes the "bits" conundrum. It's so embarrasing that the site owner doesn't want to just make a fix that's part of the website (given how easy it is to fix), but these 4 lines cleaned up the playmoney lingo to call a bitcoin a bitcoin, which makes the game a lot more enjoyable for me (and for a lot of others, apparantly).
Code:
var bbs = document.getElementsByClassName("balance-bits");
var b = document.getElementById("balance_bits");
for (var i=0;i
}
var stickies = document.getElementsByClassName("sticky");
for (var i=0;i
stickies[i].innerHTML="μBTC";
}
That is kinda neat. Thanks sed! Moneypot just got cooler.
Hey sed (or others),
I stuck your script into a greasemonkey/tampermonkey plugin to run on moneypot domain and it seems like part of it works great (the part which changes the balance in the top right) but the other part seems to run too early. That is, there's some ajax on the page and I found that using tampermonkey, your script runs before the AJAX request loads the widget which says "Bits" next to your amount to bet, in the .sticky. I don't know if you or anyone else has any advice on how to fix that (other than doing a 2 second timeout or something, which doesn't seem very elegant). It seems like in principle you may want to overwrite the XHR prototype or something so that you can have your code run onreadystatechange == 4 or something like that. But I'm not an expert so I thought I'd ask here.
Enjoy I guess you two 
Glad you got some sort of resolution.
Glad you got some sort of resolution.Mist, I have no idea why you seem so agressive on this one. There are a huge number of people on this forum who found the whole "bits" thing to be a large, poorly motivated distraction (EDIT: I'm too lazy to look up the threads, but there are quite a few and they grew to quite a length). I'm not condoning everything sed has said or done ITT but I'm really not sure why it would bother you if some people prefer not to rename bitcoin.
I understand that you don't exactly condone sed's actions, and I am in no way grouping you in with him. I don't have as much of an issue with it as it seems, I just don't really understand why some people are so adamant about not renaming it though. There are some cases where it works, and some where it doesnt. Moneypot happens to be one of those cases, but that's fine. I'm pretty done with this whole convo. Lets get some positive talk up in this bitch.Also, I like your nuts tspace
Sounds good man. I think I'm probably too old to understand the proper parsing of the various emoticons that folks use to experss themselves these days.
Ha, I guess I didn't know how to say it out loud, but I'm always glad to hear that my nuts have satisfied.
Me either, can you please clarify?
Enjoy I guess you two Glad you got some sort of resolution.
Glad you got some sort of resolution.Mist, I have no idea why you seem so agressive on this one. There are a huge number of people on this forum who found the whole "bits" thing to be a large, poorly motivated distraction (EDIT: I'm too lazy to look up the threads, but there are quite a few and they grew to quite a length). I'm not condoning everything sed has said or done ITT but I'm really not sure why it would bother you if some people prefer not to rename bitcoin.
I understand that you don't exactly condone sed's actions, and I am in no way grouping you in with him. I don't have as much of an issue with it as it seems, I just don't really understand why some people are so adamant about not renaming it though. There are some cases where it works, and some where it doesnt. Moneypot happens to be one of those cases, but that's fine. I'm pretty done with this whole convo. Lets get some positive talk up in this bitch.Also, I like your nuts tspace
Sounds good man. I think I'm probably too old to understand the proper parsing of the various emoticons that folks use to experss themselves these days.
Ha, I guess I didn't know how to say it out loud, but I'm always glad to hear that my nuts have satisfied.
Me either, can you please clarify?
Enjoy I guess you two Glad you got some sort of resolution.
Glad you got some sort of resolution.Mist, I have no idea why you seem so agressive on this one. There are a huge number of people on this forum who found the whole "bits" thing to be a large, poorly motivated distraction (EDIT: I'm too lazy to look up the threads, but there are quite a few and they grew to quite a length). I'm not condoning everything sed has said or done ITT but I'm really not sure why it would bother you if some people prefer not to rename bitcoin.
I understand that you don't exactly condone sed's actions, and I am in no way grouping you in with him. I don't have as much of an issue with it as it seems, I just don't really understand why some people are so adamant about not renaming it though. There are some cases where it works, and some where it doesnt. Moneypot happens to be one of those cases, but that's fine. I'm pretty done with this whole convo. Lets get some positive talk up in this bitch.Also, I like your nuts tspace
Sounds good man. I think I'm probably too old to understand the proper parsing of the various emoticons that folks use to experss themselves these days.
Ha, I guess I didn't know how to say it out loud, but I'm always glad to hear that my nuts have satisfied.
Enjoy I guess you two Glad you got some sort of resolution.
Glad you got some sort of resolution.Mist, I have no idea why you seem so agressive on this one. There are a huge number of people on this forum who found the whole "bits" thing to be a large, poorly motivated distraction (EDIT: I'm too lazy to look up the threads, but there are quite a few and they grew to quite a length). I'm not condoning everything sed has said or done ITT but I'm really not sure why it would bother you if some people prefer not to rename bitcoin.
I understand that you don't exactly condone sed's actions, and I am in no way grouping you in with him. I don't have as much of an issue with it as it seems, I just don't really understand why some people are so adamant about not renaming it though. There are some cases where it works, and some where it doesnt. Moneypot happens to be one of those cases, but that's fine. I'm pretty done with this whole convo. Lets get some positive talk up in this bitch.Also, I like your nuts tspace
Sounds good man. I think I'm probably too old to understand the proper parsing of the various emoticons that folks use to experss themselves these days.
Ha, I guess I didn't know how to say it out loud, but I'm always glad to hear that my nuts have satisfied.
Profit website continues to rise much less moneypot members had different
With a razor thin house edge there is a lot of variance. Reason why you are seeing the house bankroll increase is because of Mathwhiz. He has been losing quite a bit recently.it looks like I have to find a way to win back,
or I have to get out of moneypot best choice
Enjoy I guess you two Glad you got some sort of resolution.
Glad you got some sort of resolution.Mist, I have no idea why you seem so agressive on this one. There are a huge number of people on this forum who found the whole "bits" thing to be a large, poorly motivated distraction (EDIT: I'm too lazy to look up the threads, but there are quite a few and they grew to quite a length). I'm not condoning everything sed has said or done ITT but I'm really not sure why it would bother you if some people prefer not to rename bitcoin.
I understand that you don't exactly condone sed's actions, and I am in no way grouping you in with him. I don't have as much of an issue with it as it seems, I just don't really understand why some people are so adamant about not renaming it though. There are some cases where it works, and some where it doesnt. Moneypot happens to be one of those cases, but that's fine. I'm pretty done with this whole convo. Lets get some positive talk up in this bitch.Also, I like your nuts tspace
Sounds good man. I think I'm probably too old to understand the proper parsing of the various emoticons that folks use to experss themselves these days.
Enjoy I guess you two Glad you got some sort of resolution.
Glad you got some sort of resolution.Mist, I have no idea why you seem so agressive on this one. There are a huge number of people on this forum who found the whole "bits" thing to be a large, poorly motivated distraction (EDIT: I'm too lazy to look up the threads, but there are quite a few and they grew to quite a length). I'm not condoning everything sed has said or done ITT but I'm really not sure why it would bother you if some people prefer not to rename bitcoin.
I understand that you don't exactly condone sed's actions, and I am in no way grouping you in with him. I don't have as much of an issue with it as it seems, I just don't really understand why some people are so adamant about not renaming it though. There are some cases where it works, and some where it doesnt. Moneypot happens to be one of those cases, but that's fine. I'm pretty done with this whole convo. Lets get some positive talk up in this bitch.Also, I like your nuts tspace
Sounds good man. I think I'm probably too old to understand the proper parsing of the various emoticons that folks use to experss themselves these days.
Enjoy I guess you two Glad you got some sort of resolution.
Glad you got some sort of resolution.Mist, I have no idea why you seem so agressive on this one. There are a huge number of people on this forum who found the whole "bits" thing to be a large, poorly motivated distraction (EDIT: I'm too lazy to look up the threads, but there are quite a few and they grew to quite a length). I'm not condoning everything sed has said or done ITT but I'm really not sure why it would bother you if some people prefer not to rename bitcoin.
I understand that you don't exactly condone sed's actions, and I am in no way grouping you in with him. I don't have as much of an issue with it as it seems, I just don't really understand why some people are so adamant about not renaming it though. There are some cases where it works, and some where it doesnt. Moneypot happens to be one of those cases, but that's fine. I'm pretty done with this whole convo. Lets get some positive talk up in this bitch.Also, I like your nuts tspace
Enjoy I guess you two Glad you got some sort of resolution.
Glad you got some sort of resolution.Mist, I have no idea why you seem so agressive on this one. There are a huge number of people on this forum who found the whole "bits" thing to be a large, poorly motivated distraction (EDIT: I'm too lazy to look up the threads, but there are quite a few and they grew to quite a length). I'm not condoning everything sed has said or done ITT but I'm really not sure why it would bother you if some people prefer not to rename bitcoin.
Enjoy I guess you two Glad you got some sort of resolution.
Glad you got some sort of resolution. I finally tried it. The animation is pretty neat. I worked pretty good for me in chromium. However, in firefox it just froze up.
I thought someone said I could change "bits" to satoshis somewhere in the interface. I couldn't find it though. The "bits" thing makes it seem like play money or some new altcoin.
Also, I ended up with 0.51 "bits" which I think is 51 satoshis. Can I gift this to someone on the site somehow? Is there a tipping mechanism? It seems like 100Sat is the smallest amount you're allowed to bet.
I thought someone said I could change "bits" to satoshis somewhere in the interface. I couldn't find it though. The "bits" thing makes it seem like play money or some new altcoin.
Also, I ended up with 0.51 "bits" which I think is 51 satoshis. Can I gift this to someone on the site somehow? Is there a tipping mechanism? It seems like 100Sat is the smallest amount you're allowed to bet.
no tipping mechanism yet in moneypot as it will encourage begging in chat , and also you can use shiba for the calculation to satoshi, although i forgot the command, it will be wise for ryan to actually add a FAQ list for shiba's command
FYI 1 bits = 100 satoshis
Yes, yes, I know what a "bit" is said to equal. I'm not wanting to go down that road again (it seems like 20% of this thread has been dedicated to fights about "bits"). I just thought that there was an option in the UI to make it say something normal like Satoshis or uBTC. It's all good, I must have misunderstood.
Like I said, the animation was pretty neat.
Assuming you know how to make your browser run some custom javascript on a particular site/page, then you can save the following as a file and it finally fixes the "bits" conundrum. It's so embarrasing that the site owner doesn't want to just make a fix that's part of the website (given how easy it is to fix), but these 4 lines cleaned up the playmoney lingo to call a bitcoin a bitcoin, which makes the game a lot more enjoyable for me (and for a lot of others, apparantly).
Code:
var bbs = document.getElementsByClassName("balance-bits");
var b = document.getElementById("balance_bits");
for (var i=0;i
}
var stickies = document.getElementsByClassName("sticky");
for (var i=0;i
stickies[i].innerHTML="μBTC";
}
var b = document.getElementById("balance_bits");
for (var i=0;i
}
var stickies = document.getElementsByClassName("sticky");
for (var i=0;i
stickies[i].innerHTML="μBTC";
}
That is kinda neat. Thanks sed! Moneypot just got cooler.
Do you also feel it is always lost when big bet
I can assure you that your (or anyone's) bets have no zero impact on the game outcomes. All our code is open source and we've developed a provably fair system, that has provably pre-generated the results of 10 million games in advance, and allows you to verify every game immediately. You can easily use a quick script I made to prove the games yourself if you want.
I'm sorry you lost, it sucks. But if you take the time to research it, I'm sure you'll also come to the conclusion it happened fairly and was just bad luck =)
Profit website continues to rise much less moneypot members had different
With a razor thin house edge there is a lot of variance. Reason why you are seeing the house bankroll increase is because of Mathwhiz. He has been losing quite a bit recently. Profit website continues to rise much less moneypot members had different
With a razor thin house edge there is a lot of variance. Reason why you are seeing the house bankroll increase is because of Mathwhiz. He has been losing quite a bit recently.Profit website continues to rise much less moneypot members had different
With a razor thin house edge there is a lot of variance. Reason why you are seeing the house bankroll increase is because of Mathwhiz. He has been losing quite a bit recently.Profit website continues to rise much less moneypot members had different
With a razor thin house edge there is a lot of variance. Reason why you are seeing the house bankroll increase is because of Mathwhiz. He has been losing quite a bit recently.Jump to: