If success was so easy-peasy, then there would be way more people who already have financial security in their lives, and surely that is not true. There is also regional and geographical variation in regards to historically who gets wealthy and how they get wealthy, which has a lot of corrupt, confusing and preclusive aspects. Surely bitcoin is a new way to potentially become rich and to have success, and it has ONLY been around for 14 years, and at the same time has ONLY had a market, a monetary value and increasingly more accessible to everyone for around 12-ish years.. and arguably even less than that in terms of people in all parts of the world actually being able to reasonably access bitcoin - once they learn about it.. seems like challenges to me, rather than ease in being successful..
If it is so easy to be successful, why are there so many poor people in the world? Is it because the so many poor people are too dumb or they are not "trying hard enough"?
You hardly make any sense YUriy1991, unless you are only viewing the world and the circumstances of people with a kind of rose-tinted glasses in which you believe everyone has opportunties that might have had been available to you and to your particular circumstances, or are you perhaps trying to suggest that you came out of the gutters, pulled yourself up by the bootstraps to become the successful person that presumptively you have become completely through your own efforts?
I will concede that there are a lot of people with very dumb and superficial ideas about bitcoin (and about other subject matters too), and there are a lot of people who will come to a lot of dumb conclusions about bitcoin (and other aspects about the world and the way it works) based on very little information that supports their dumb-ass theories, but even if there are a lot of people who might think like that and use poor logic and few facts to arrive at their conclusions about bitcoin and the ways of the world, that should not mean that we should give their dumb-ass theories any kind of meaningful weight or to spout out the dumb theories as if they were "important to consider;" otherwise we may well include ourselves into the same kind of thinking and committing the same kinds of fallacies.
Don't get me wrong, I am not trying to proclaim that I am any kind of a genius or that I am better (or smarter) than everyone else, but there are things that each and everyone of us can try to employ better methods and tactics in terms of trying to use actual facts that support logic and sound conclusions, rather than failing/refusing to learn or to understand how some relevant (and inconvenient) facts might fit so that we can arrive at better conclusions, even if we might never really be able to achieve 100% perfect information.. .or perfect logic or perfectly sound conclusions, but we can still strive to be better and to learn from the various ways that our information, logic and conclusions might be defective.
If to find out what BTC is and how to invest with BTC is very easy and not at all difficult through theory.
When in practice, someone will be faced with various problems. One problem that is difficult to practice is "weak hand" and "weak mind to analyze".
Like the sentence or statement "buy and sell at the right time". Easy to pronounce, but difficult in its application.
Have you ever made a roadmap in compiling success?
These are a lot of great ideas yudi09.. first of all there are all kinds of ways in which putting theories into practice can better inform any of us about the extent to which our theories are somewhat reasonable and/or tailored to our own situations, and in bitcoin there are quite a few individualized factors to consider that we might not really understand very well until we have practiced for a while, and even circumstances in year 1 could be quite different from circumstances in year 5 as compared with circumstances in year 10, so frequently it is good to adjust from time to time.. and like you suggested, some kind of a roadmap or projection of what you want to achieve can be laid out, and even with the application of a roadmap and compared with the earlier stages of theorizing the roadmap, frequently there will need to be some adjustments along the way, and some of those adjustments might be minor and sometimes there will need to be some major changes that will help to make the roadmap more realistic in terms of being able to achieve.
I personally prefer to try to create both achievable objectives and also aspirational objectives (that may or may not end up being achieved), and sometimes even the objectives need to be changed or to be made more realistic based on actual circumstances rather than circumstances that you wish (or project them to be them to be at some point in the future - that may or may not end up happening)... just because something is achievable does not mean that it "will be achieved," even though once it is actually achieved it becomes way more concrete and may also end up affecting future projections based on the actual achievement of some intermediary goal rather than the speculations about achieving some intermediary goal.
Yes.. you can choose the extent to which you take anything in your life seriously, and sometimes you can have way more fun if you have taken certain aspects of your life more seriously (such as building wealth versus gambling or getting lured into "fun" shitcoins).
Also, I doubt anyone just achieves "extensive knowledge" without a lot of practice and making improvements along the way, so likely each and everyone of us start out as being pretty dumb in a lot of ways, and there are ways that some people learn more along the way as compared with others and some people are also persistent in their various ways of pursuing knowledge and attempting to actually apply that knowledge to the real world - rather than ongoingly speculating about various fantasy worlds.