My opinion is that he might have something legitimate, convoluted but legitimate nevertheless.
But he is so unprofessional and immature that the probable end result in any transaction with him will be very similar to being scammed.
I can imagine all types of stupid noob mistakes, negligence and miscommunication between the customer, the actual broker, the seller and this legendary clown.
Some kids should grow some facial hair before even attempting to deal in the business world.
My opinion is that it was 100% a scam. He posted pictures that were not his, he lied, etc. And the best evidence I have is that [surprisingly] he made good on his promise to leave the forum forever after I exposed him yesterday.But he is so unprofessional and immature that the probable end result in any transaction with him will be very similar to being scammed.
I can imagine all types of stupid noob mistakes, negligence and miscommunication between the customer, the actual broker, the seller and this legendary clown.
Some kids should grow some facial hair before even attempting to deal in the business world.
The actual broker was Le Cruze. Le Cruze might have just pulled pictures off the internet instead of getting pictures from his customers to illustrate what type of cars are available for sale.
Another possibility is that the owners had several brokers listing their cars.
In any case, I see several plausible scenarios but I have no interest in further wasting time to confirm or disprove these possibilities.
Whatever the case is, one thing is for sure: Legendster is highly unreliable even if it is a legitimate deal.
Hi bitsalame.
I think there are many intelligent people on this forum (as i hit the spacebar after "intelligent," a squiggly red line appeared beneath it -- typo
). Intelligent people tend to have both pretty developed sense of doubt and imagination. Take that along with a strict interpretation of "innocent until proven guilty," and you have the current situation on these boards: scammers who evade tags & bans because a plausible innocence scenario can always be imagined.I don't claim having a simple alternative -- i'd hate to be the accused in a court where judges decided my fate on nothing more than "sort'a seems guilty to me. Guilty!"
But this is not a court where man's freedom is decided. This is not even a civil court, where the burden of proof is far more lax than "beyond a shadow of a doubt." The worst that can happen here is five red crosses plastered over your forum name. Worst case scenario for this user? Create a new account, and spend another month browsing this forum.
