Topic: Bytom Mining - ASIC algorithm now cracked by GPU miners? Big profits? - page 12. (Read 17672 times)

seems like win version and linx version are different miners from different coders?

What is a "cublas error (um_31)" and how to fix it?

generally speaking i have 1060 hash/s wih HiveOS , under win 10 i have 960 with same power limit / core clocks etc. Actually looking at cards on nvidiainspector they draw more power than linux reports. ( 120-140 W respectively for gtx 1070 ti / 1080 ). I have i7 8700 but it's running at 30 % under win 10 so it is looking good. Also the dependency over PCIE x16 slots / super strong CPU etc seems removed under windows. So my guess is that actually under linux they is still plenty of room for improvement and eventual + in hash there. Windows should also be capable of a bit more I am seeing that cards stay at 100% gpu load , but constantly fall to low loads . Still overall linux seems better for 1-2 GPU system and windows seems better for multi gpu systems.

Hi guys!

My results 2700-2800 H/s

6*1070TI PCI-Ex1 (ASUS Cerber)@G4400@Win7Pro

F2POOL

https://ibb.co/bz6BVy

I got maximum 2820 H/s with memspeed  at 4400MHz

it's the opposite for me, i couldn't boot MinerOs (Always stuck on startup).
you can use Ubuntu or Lubuntu (i got the same result as HiveOs) 16.04 LTS

Im getting 280h/s extra moving from linux to windows miner.

4 x 1060 = 948h/s  i5 2500s all on x1 risers windows

on linux was 680h/s

100% cou usage in windows same as linux

2018-06-03 19:17:29,105 INFO - : 251.29 H/s  : 233.79 H/s  : 229.60 H/s  : 222.85 H/s
2018-06-03 19:17:39,110 INFO - : 253.78 H/s  : 237.86 H/s  : 229.34 H/s  : 222.13 H/s
2018-06-03 19:17:49,114 INFO - ========== REPORT ==========
2018-06-03 19:17:49,119 INFO - Total Hashrate: 942.06 H/s | Accept shares: 2 | Reject shares: 0
2018-06-03 19:17:49,122 INFO - : 248.24 H/s  : 241.22 H/s  : 226.55 H/s  : 226.05 H/s
2018-06-03 19:17:58,480 INFO - Found a target, submitted.
2018-06-03 19:17:58,734 INFO - Share accepted.
2018-06-03 19:17:59,311 INFO - : 256.00 H/s  : 240.38 H/s  : 222.85 H/s  : 227.05 H/s
2018-06-03 19:18:09,112 INFO - : 255.36 H/s  : 234.06 H/s  : 228.83 H/s  : 225.30 H/s



EDIT: After burner slide your RAM to -502 MHZ it makes no differnce to hash rate , and power target 65-75.

I cannot get hive to even boot from USB having to use minerOS which is stuck at 600h/s with a 1070 and a 1060

Tested with 2 GTX1060 6Gb (PCI-E x8) + i7 2700k @4.6Ghz
i get 588h/s max :
http://i64.tinypic.com/126cldi.jpg

In HiveOs 790h/s max :
http://i64.tinypic.com/2j0z2hd.jpg

huge difference !

Bytom GPU Miner  for windows 

https://github.com/NebuTech/BTMiner_NebuTech/releases

i use a10-7860k and i have 6 1070 and 2 1080ti. can it handle the btm miner?

What motherboard do you have for this results?

I have an experimental rig asus prime z-370A + i3-8100
If you include 3 1050ti cards through risers into 3 GEN3 slots (3 16x - GEN3), you get the result: 150, 150, 250, if you connect 2 cards to GEN3, and third in PIC-E 1x, you get 150, 250, 250.

0-290.1 1-233.5 Total: 523.7 H/s  2018/06/03 20:20:03 1 - Yay, solution found!
0-309.1 1-245.0 Total: 554.0 H/s  2018/06/03 20:21:11 1 - Yay, solution found! - 2x1050ti Intel(R) Pentium(R) CPU G4400 @ 3.30GHz PCI-E 16x GEN3 without raisers

I guess most mainstream motherboards only have gen3 on the first slot.

1 x PCI Express 3.0* / 2.0 x16 slot (blue at x16 mode)
1 x PCI Express 2.0 x16 slot (black at x4 mode, compatible with PCIe x1
and x4 devies)
2 x PCI Express 2.0 x1 slots
3 x PCI slots
* PCIe 3.0 speed is supported by Intel® 3rd generation CoreTM

That would explain the first card being a higher has rate. Jumping from an i5 to an i7 yields a 400h/s increase on the total hash rate.

It is necessary to include PCI-E GEN3 everywhere. In the rig with the i3 8400, this changes the speed from 700 to 1000-1100. On the rig with the g4400 processor nothing has changed and the card 1050 gives still 150 h / s. The CPU load is 100% on all rigs and more than 1000 h / s with 1 rig is not obtained. Pentium g4400 it does not work out more than 700-800.

You can put at least as many cards as you like, but you can not get 1000-1200 hashes from 1 rig.

The miner always seems to favour the first card. I get 323 307 227 232 h/s on 4 x 1060's.. all on x1 risers.. a right spread

 0 01:00.0 GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (4039 MiB, 95.00 W)
 1 02:00.0 GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (4040 MiB, 75.00 W)
 2 06:00.0 GeForce GTX 1070 (8119 MiB, 200.00 W)
 3 07:00.0 GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (4040 MiB, 75.00 W)
 4 08:00.0 GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (4040 MiB, 75.00 W)

0-279.4 1-252.3 2-193.8 3-193.5 4-190.0 Total: 1109.0 H/s  2018/06/03 02:15:25 2 - Yay, solution found!

1070 - card number 3. And why 1 and 2 cards are approximately equal, when the system only 1 1070 and 4 1050?

NVIDIA-SMI 381.22   

. 
The first card is the 1070 , cards numbers match physic pcie slots in the miner. So far by looking into all of the results I think that the system drivers cpu and absolutely everything causes super big differences in hashrates . This is probably by the algorithm itself considering the ASICS are also hashing way too low . But overall everything might cause big hash flactuations . The starting point should be to test each 1060 1070 1080 etc speed on standalone system I mean not multi GPUs . Test it with raiser etc and determine basic optimal speeds . Then you can say wether your speed is good or not . Seeing that Titan x makes almost 1kh/s makes me think that we current version of miner we need really good cpu with a lot of speed on single core and thread and use only one GPUs on x16 slot

Can you tell about driver versions? Nvidia-smi shows

I get different results depending on the operating system and drivers.
Gentoo, 1050ti@PCI-E 16x, AMD Phenom 2, 16gb
CUDA = 8
Driver = 381 , CARD COUNT=1 , WK=0x254
getGpuCount error:0

Init GPU Device 0: "GeForce GTX 1050 Ti" with compute capability 6.1

2018/06/02 20:20:33 Starting BTM mining
2018/06/02 20:20:33 0 - Initializing
2018/06/02 20:20:33 0 - No work ready
2018/06/02 20:20:35 login of bm1q6gt9njdkrr7tg0jlghwykrw8jj5sz7ckjnjxv3.0x254 success
2018/06/02 20:20:35 waitting ...
2018/06/02 20:20:35 New job received from stratum server
2018/06/02 20:20:36 0 - Continuing
Update seed cache on device 0
0-238.3 Total: 238.3 H/s  2018/06/02 20:20:39 New job received from stratum server
0-237.5 Total: 237.5 H/s  2018/06/02 20:20:58 0 - Yay, solution found!
0-237.7 Total: 237.7 H/s  2018/06/02 20:21:56 0 - Yay, solution found!
0-235.6 Total: 235.6 H/s  2018/06/02 20:22:19 New job received from stratum server
Update seed cache on device 0
0-236.3 Total: 236.3 H/s  2018/06/02 20:25:25 0 - Yay, solution found!
0-236.9 Total: 236.9 H/s

HiveOS, CUDA9 1070 PCI-E 16x, 3x1050ti PCI-E 1x i5-4590 CPU @ 3.30GHz, 32Gb:
0-307.7 1-274.9 2-200.5 3-197.8 Total: 981.0 H/s  2018/06/02 20:27:15 0 - Yay, solution found!
0-299.9 1-277.6 2-198.1 3-195.5 Total: 971.1 H/s  2018/06/02 20:27:21 New job received from stratum server
0-305.8 1-271.0 2-195.4 3-198.0 Total: 970.3 H/s  2018/06/02 20:29:10 0 - Yay, solution found!
I can not even figure out which of the cards is 1070 (
Very strange miner.

Well a Titan V gets about 965 h/s     https://drive.google.com/open?id=1fXQSiTxUJEaeqGoiz3m9r0b4mmU6_1X6