Yeah I wouldn't touch anything you do with a 10ft pole. I had my hands on all fpga from all manufacturers that were available, yours were clearly far worst.
This seems a bit unfair on Enterpoint/yohan.
My CM1 boards are still running strong after about a year of continuous usage
I think you and kakobrekla are talking about two completely different measures of quality.
kakobrekla is talking about the signal integrity dimension of the overall quality.
norulezapply is talking about the manufacturing and reliability dimension of the overall quality.
Those two dimensions are nearly ortogonal and incommesurate.
This thread is proof for both: it took the longest time from the delivery of assembled hardware to the delivery of correctly and efficiently operating bitstream. Apparently CM1 has some sort of ringing/standing wave problem in the clock distribution networks and the USB interface on the PCB.
But once working CM1 proved themselves much more reliable than the majority of the consumer grade GPU boards used for mining. Those GPU boards had almost no problems with statrting up minning but became a real challenge to operate continuously because of the component failures.
I'm just an observer here but there is one striking thing about all the Enterpoint PCBs: they are all very symmetric geometrically. On the other hand I know that the PCB designers often intentionally make their designs geometrically asymmetric as a simplest and cheapest way to reduce the Q-factor of the possible parasitic resonators made of the PCB traces.
yohan had mentioned several times that the CM1 product was not developed using the full human resources of Enterpoint. It makes me wonder if Enterpoint even has a full time analog signal integrity specialist. I certainly have seen several organizations where the signal integrity issues were resolved purely by trial-and-error process.
I'm just contrasting Enterpoint's approach with bitfury's approach: he seem to be the only one who made the analog simulations of the signal and power distribution when designing his ASIC. Professionally I have only experience with the methodology very much like bitfury's which results in the software (bitstream) being delivered ahead of the hardware (PCB).