It is true that those who are still in school and still get money from their parents are not natural if they do gambling because of mental statements that are not yet mature, because even people who are mature in my opinion there are still those whose mentality is damaged by gambling. Gambling should be done by people who already have their own income, even many people who already have their own income but they are always short of their needs, and that I think is because they gamble too much.
There are countries were kids at the age of 14-16 can officially work (but their daily working hours are lower than adults working day hours), they officially get salary., they have rights to spend their earned money the way they want. And it looks illogical that they arent allowed to spend them on gambling? Would you agree with that? People use such argument as "addiction" as a reason for underaged not to gamble. But does gambling addiction for 16 or 26 years old is anyhow different? Kids with money can be addicted to others things. For example they can get addicted to fast food. Earn own money, go and eat burgers every day. Does it means that food addiction is less harmful than gambling? With gambling at 18+ only there are so many compromises and things to tell in opposite.
Indeed, that is their own right, but I never thought that there would be children under 18 years of age who are already working and I also think it is unethical for them to spend their money on gambling even though it is their own income, because they are not yet adults either. Even if I have a younger sibling, I won't allow them to work, because they are not old enough, with their unstable thinking, I don't want anything bad to happen to my younger sibling, even if their intention is to help the family financially, unless they are already adults. that's for me, but maybe for you it's different, you would allow your younger sibling to work and spend it on gambling but for me that won't happen especially if they gamble because it could ruin their future, that's what I'm afraid of.
I'm sure you know the difference between good addictions and bad addictions. I think that with them gambling at an immature age is not good, as much as possible we should be able to avoid addiction. Even among adults, many of them are addicted, therefore there is nothing that can rule out the possibility of them not being addicted, even if they are under 18 years old.
When people talk about addiction, I always want them to ask to remember when was the last time they saw gambling addicted person, and what was his age. I find it hard to believe that if kids get familiar with gambling, they will turn into addicted gamblers as soon as they will be allowed to gamble. And first thing they would do when they turn adults, will be running to casino.
How I see gambling addicted person - that is a person already in age. That is why I think he has plenty of time to gamble, to turn his passion into addiction. And I am definitely sure that such person gambles today not because he has starting gambling early.
When people talk about kids and addiction to gambling, I find it hard to believe there is a real threat. What I mean is, if we take 100,000 kids, how many of them would really be interested in gambling, and how many would get addicted to it? From posts here, is sounds that among 100,000, all of them would get addicted just by standing near those who gamble. Like gambling is a kind of a virus. While in general I think not more than 100 would.