BTC doesnt beat banks, I think the point or the danger might be the banks beat the banks which if society has no alternative at that point is going to send us backwards.
I was pleasantly surprised government was not especially negative towards crypto though arguably not that positive either, I think at least part of the reason was there was some scenario where BTC could be of use of benefit to a society and also in liberating suppressed and captive markets that are not democratic or capitalist. Hence BTC was 'allowed'
can cryptocurrency beat legacy financial institutions to the point of replacing them?
... Thought as much... The much lauded JPMCoin was all noise and no substance
JPM doesnt get it especially. They make some token that is nothing more then paypal is. Paypal was originally started to be a kind of online currency, instead it just became a payment system but in theory it was intended to be revolutionary. JPM or whoever lack the imagination and innovation to really be revolutionary it seems, they will copy and try capture some of the success but I doubt they manage to improve or really give any benefit to users of their system. If this is the case, its not likely to last more then the publicity is beneficial
I do not think BTC replaces banks, it really is something new and not leveraged hence quite far from whats considered normal banking now. I dont think they conflict really, different paths