Topic: Can Bitcoin maximalism be defeated in the reality of adoption? - page 2. (Read 1504 times)
I told you not to sell at $430.
Yes. Because there is no adoption and no need to use Bitcoin. And there will always be a need to use physical cash. Internet isnt everywhere, and does go out in places that do have it, so trade has to stop in these situations?
Why again do I need Bitcoin or an altcoin? I don't.
So governments outlaw cash, and mandate bitcoin. Obviously lots of sheep will follow. But other stuff will replace cash. ( remember, there are close to 1 million homeless already)
Maybe it's a local exchange dollar
Maybe it's tide detergent, google that..
Maybe people trade prepaid cards
Maybe people trade drugs /guns
Maybe people trade food, livestock, plants
Point is the blackmarket will never be extinguished, and people will use something to trade for those items.
Hmm, the bitcoin killer needs to be able to be a physical cash like item that can also be sent over the internet that uses some type of zero knowlege proof to verify that the physical cash item contains the value it claims.
Why again do I need Bitcoin or an altcoin? I don't.
So governments outlaw cash, and mandate bitcoin. Obviously lots of sheep will follow. But other stuff will replace cash. ( remember, there are close to 1 million homeless already)
Maybe it's a local exchange dollar
Maybe it's tide detergent, google that..
Maybe people trade prepaid cards
Maybe people trade drugs /guns
Maybe people trade food, livestock, plants
Point is the blackmarket will never be extinguished, and people will use something to trade for those items.
Hmm, the bitcoin killer needs to be able to be a physical cash like item that can also be sent over the internet that uses some type of zero knowlege proof to verify that the physical cash item contains the value it claims.
possibly, but likely not without also defeating cryptocurrency maximalism imo.
one of the only reasons im fine seeing stuff like eth/ripple scare the maximalists a bit, which is also the reason why i say its possible, but not without defeating cryptocurrency maximalism.
one of the only reasons im fine seeing stuff like eth/ripple scare the maximalists a bit, which is also the reason why i say its possible, but not without defeating cryptocurrency maximalism.
I leave this OP open to comment from all. I don't intend to participate. Let's hear what you all have to say. Here is your chance to pump your favorite altcoin (Ethereum maximalism delusion, lol) in the context of overtaking Bitcoin (yeah right 
), or to make more cogent comments. "Trump + Lisk with DAO for President" nonsense is your prerogative.
If we don't stop this BitCON Trojan Horse, the freedom of mankind will decline in a 666 system of digital tracking and centralized, top-down control much worse then we had with fiat cash.
We damn well better accomplish it.
This comment:
Applies to the following incorrect post:
The flaws can't be fixed both for technical reasons and also because of vested inertial resistance.
And BitCON will become 666 more oppressive+totalitarian than the fiat cash we had before it:
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.15124687
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.15126064
You are supporting the destruction of the freedom of mankind. Thank you for your unwavering, radicalised dedication to your geek-cool enslavement system ideals.
), or to make more cogent comments. "Trump + Lisk with DAO for President" nonsense is your prerogative.Re: Will Bitcoin be replaced by another cryptocurrency?
Does it make sense to believe that Bitcoin could one day be replaced by another cryptocurrency, that is, a cryptocurrency that really does make Bitcoin obsolete?
Does it make sense to believe that Bitcoin could one day be replaced by another cryptocurrency, that is, a cryptocurrency that really does make Bitcoin obsolete?
If we don't stop this BitCON Trojan Horse, the freedom of mankind will decline in a 666 system of digital tracking and centralized, top-down control much worse then we had with fiat cash.
We damn well better accomplish it.
This comment:
It is not dumb that n00bs don't know the technology and game theory economics. What is dumb is when n00bs (such as the Bitcoin maximalist comments in this thread) think they know something about an issue that is far too complex for them to be comprehend without deep research that they are unwilling or incapable of doing. This is known as the Dunning-Kruger effect.
So many dumb comments in this thread by Bitcoin maximalists who will invent any excuse possible to remain in denial of the fact that
...
So many dumb comments in this thread by Bitcoin maximalists who will invent any excuse possible to remain in denial of the fact that
...
Applies to the following incorrect post:
Bitcoin is flawed, but these flaws can be fixed. Bitcoin is already a big step ahead of fiat currencies.
The flaws can't be fixed both for technical reasons and also because of vested inertial resistance.
And BitCON will become 666 more oppressive+totalitarian than the fiat cash we had before it:
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.15124687
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.15126064
You are supporting the destruction of the freedom of mankind. Thank you for your unwavering, radicalised dedication to your geek-cool enslavement system ideals.
Jump to: