Topic: Can bounty with large allocations make you profitable ?? - page 2. (Read 12435 times)
People are so much concern with bounties with huge allocations which at the long round produces no reasonable profit. For bounties to be considered profitable, it doesn't matter how huge the allocation might be, provided the team behind the project is good and experienced to market the project well. I disagree with bounties with huge allocations considered profitable.
Large allocations are no guarantee to get big profits from the campaign.
but this can be a consideration so that your time is more valuable.
but this can be a consideration so that your time is more valuable.
For sure it can, but it all depends on their developers and team members. When they have a well written whitepaper, great marketing plan, good process at the product development and a bunch of money, they have all chances to make their coin very big.
but sometimes the best planning is not as smooth as expected. even though the plan has been run sometimes the market response is not so good. that makes many projects finally have to die and be buried, because they do not have good asset values and good trade. I often see bounties that allocate large tokens even equivalent to $ 1 million in tokens.
Then there are also bounties that have a small allocation of around $ 50k USD in tokens ...
So where do you think that will be promising and the tokens are valuable ??
because I also wonder why the team held a bounty with only large allocations of softcap money not achieved.
what do you think about this opinion.
Then there are also bounties that have a small allocation of around $ 50k USD in tokens ...
So where do you think that will be promising and the tokens are valuable ??
because I also wonder why the team held a bounty with only large allocations of softcap money not achieved.
what do you think about this opinion.
A large bounty allocation means huge earnings but take note that its a "potential" earning not a sure thing. Of course it all depends whether the project will be successful or not. The allocation is useless if the project fails. Also, if it succeeds, it still depends on its value when it hits the market. The developer and the bounty manager are also contributes to your success whether they will distribute the token or not.
Sometimes they just payout. It happens. If noone else wants to join and only one person believes in the project then they deserve to earn that many coins. Everyone else had the same chance to join but didn't.
Sometimes they will reduce it or it will be a massive amount to one person. None the less said person would have earned majority shares in that coin.
I often see bounties that allocate large tokens even equivalent to $ 1 million in tokens.
Then there are also bounties that have a small allocation of around $ 50k USD in tokens ...
So where do you think that will be promising and the tokens are valuable ??
because I also wonder why the team held a bounty with only large allocations of softcap money not achieved.
what do you think about this opinion.
Then there are also bounties that have a small allocation of around $ 50k USD in tokens ...
So where do you think that will be promising and the tokens are valuable ??
because I also wonder why the team held a bounty with only large allocations of softcap money not achieved.
what do you think about this opinion.
A large bounty allocation means huge earnings but take note that its a "potential" earning not a sure thing. Of course it all depends whether the project will be successful or not. The allocation is useless if the project fails. Also, if it succeeds, it still depends on its value when it hits the market. The developer and the bounty manager are also contributes to your success whether they will distribute the token or not.
From my experience, most bounties with large allocations always result in problems. Either the bounty hunters are locked for a long period of time to prevent dumping of tokens. It is part of strategies used by project dev to attract many hunters in promoting their tokens. Subaj is one of them. Up till today, ( almost a year now) bounty hunters token were not allocated not to talk about being distributed. Also, the CEO on the telegram page has turned to ban anyone that makes a provocative comment about the bounty programme. A lot still exist today but recently old bounty hunters are getting wiser
For sure it can, but it all depends on their developers and team members. When they have a well written whitepaper, great marketing plan, good process at the product development and a bunch of money, they have all chances to make their coin very big.
Maybe, but you have to be very diligent and patient.
I advise Cloud Token (only the beginning of the project), read more about it here https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/cloud-token-crypto-wallet-with-high-income-trend-5157220 , I advise you to sort out the topic so as not to blame yourself for the lost opportunity! 💪
P.S. The project token has the ability to do x10 before the end of the year.
I advise Cloud Token (only the beginning of the project), read more about it here https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/cloud-token-crypto-wallet-with-high-income-trend-5157220 , I advise you to sort out the topic so as not to blame yourself for the lost opportunity! 💪
P.S. The project token has the ability to do x10 before the end of the year.
allocation for me is not a major benchmark in joining a profitable bounty, but what I have noticed is how well the team and project will be done, because not all large bounties have the price of tokens or coins that are good or even worthless at all . so we can't see a bounty from the allocation.
I often see bounties that allocate large tokens even equivalent to $ 1 million in tokens.
Then there are also bounties that have a small allocation of around $ 50k USD in tokens ...
So where do you think that will be promising and the tokens are valuable ??
because I also wonder why the team held a bounty with only large allocations of softcap money not achieved.
what do you think about this opinion.
Then there are also bounties that have a small allocation of around $ 50k USD in tokens ...
So where do you think that will be promising and the tokens are valuable ??
because I also wonder why the team held a bounty with only large allocations of softcap money not achieved.
what do you think about this opinion.
Bounty hunters are wiser now, big allocations will not lure them if they see the project is dubious, they are looking more on the project's potential in the market, what if you can get 5 or 6 digit tokens if you cannot even sell them or the price is worth a few pennies in the market.
I often see bounties that allocate large tokens even equivalent to $ 1 million in tokens.
Then there are also bounties that have a small allocation of around $ 50k USD in tokens ...
So where do you think that will be promising and the tokens are valuable ??
because I also wonder why the team held a bounty with only large allocations of softcap money not achieved.
what do you think about this opinion.
Then there are also bounties that have a small allocation of around $ 50k USD in tokens ...
So where do you think that will be promising and the tokens are valuable ??
because I also wonder why the team held a bounty with only large allocations of softcap money not achieved.
what do you think about this opinion.
The small the allocation the better, because it has only limited number of tokens to be in circulation, the thing is many bounty projects has millions of bounty tokens allocated but the price in it, is just minimal, so i think the lower the tokens, the higher the value, its a vice versa i think, but i dont usually join projects that are large number of tokens allocated, its just a waste of time for me, as the total value of tokens is just a penny.
As far as I can judge from my own experience, this is not so important. Only marketing is important. The stronger the marketing of the project, the higher the likelihood that in the wake of popularity, its price will soar.
Allocation for bounties matter, but with my experience in bounties, it's not entirely about allocations. For example carry protocol allocation for article wasn't really large at such, but it did 10x on exchange. So you see, some will have large allocation for bounty but will dump -10x when listed on exchange. Also look at the project, how good is it? Do you think it has future prospects? These are some things to consider before doing any bounty.
Just as in the case of investor, everyone determines for himself, when to sell for fair profit. Huge allocation or lesser, the market worth is the the common denominator for all rewards. Huge rewards with low woth is still the same with low rewards huge worth....
I often see bounties that allocate large tokens even equivalent to $ 1 million in tokens.
Then there are also bounties that have a small allocation of around $ 50k USD in tokens ...
So where do you think that will be promising and the tokens are valuable ??
because I also wonder why the team held a bounty with only large allocations of softcap money not achieved.
what do you think about this opinion.
Then there are also bounties that have a small allocation of around $ 50k USD in tokens ...
So where do you think that will be promising and the tokens are valuable ??
because I also wonder why the team held a bounty with only large allocations of softcap money not achieved.
what do you think about this opinion.
It depends on how the project will prosper when it will be introduced in the market. When it will get value in exchanges it's the only time that we can see whether this large allocated bounty is profitable or not.
A large allocation is only to attract bounty hunters to join and in fact those who have a large allocation at the end of their campaign reduce allocation for bounty on the grounds that the funds achieved are not in line with expectations, so don't be directly interested in large allocations but do research before joining
I will give you one example.
Terawatt LED token was sold in ICO phase for 0.4USD. Good rating on ICOBench, now the price is 0.00004631$, is that really possible?
Terawatt LED token was sold in ICO phase for 0.4USD. Good rating on ICOBench, now the price is 0.00004631$, is that really possible?
i also think about those projects, that were down by 1000 times or more, is there a project really, or everything is just a scam
many bounty hunters go out immediately after distribution, if the token/coin is on the market, and make this go down possible, but if that is 1000 times, than ICO value is highly over real value
I will give you one example.
Terawatt LED token was sold in ICO phase for 0.4USD. Good rating on ICOBench, now the price is 0.00004631$, is that really possible?
Terawatt LED token was sold in ICO phase for 0.4USD. Good rating on ICOBench, now the price is 0.00004631$, is that really possible?
I often see bounties that allocate large tokens even equivalent to $ 1 million in tokens.
Then there are also bounties that have a small allocation of around $ 50k USD in tokens ...
So where do you think that will be promising and the tokens are valuable ??
because I also wonder why the team held a bounty with only large allocations of softcap money not achieved.
what do you think about this opinion.
Then there are also bounties that have a small allocation of around $ 50k USD in tokens ...
So where do you think that will be promising and the tokens are valuable ??
because I also wonder why the team held a bounty with only large allocations of softcap money not achieved.
what do you think about this opinion.
They are not the realistic price of the token, it's just a speculation and of course, bounty hunters will be attracted because of the huge allocation, I've received bounty rewards that were worth $5000 of their token price but in the market, I can only trade it to $300 and I'm glad I did because the coin is not in the market anymore.
Usually strong projects not strongly many emit on bounty, usually this sum hardly comes to 100k. The rest attract a large budget thereby attracting many people. You can take a risk and enter into such a company, or get a little, but almost 100%.
Jump to: