Topic: Can Man Lives without Sex? - page 4. (Read 845 times)

A man can easily have 300+ kids a year (uhm, well - there are certain biological limitations on the other side - so it'll require choosing the "right time" for women, meaning that up to several K may be required to choose from). And then what? What kind of father will he become? Who will support all that 300+ women during pregnancy and later on? Recently (like in the last century) a mother growing a kid on her own became pretty common and possible - though with some limitations. More that one kid? I've heard of a prostitute who grows 7(!, surely from different fathers, truck drivers) and they are completely "equipped" - clothes, food, toys, etc - so social workers can't do anything about that situation. What's in the head of that kids? No idea. But that situation is an exception and I doubt things will end up well.

Religion does promote responsibility although the form it does that is very indirect. There are societies where a man has multiple wives and there are opposite situations as well - it's all dictated by the life circumstances.

And physiological pleasure and hormones... What will make a man waste his life to support another person or even several? "for free" that is. You can't imagine what could one afford if he had no kids.

Imagine that you don't need to eat or drink to live (that is completely... like you're "solar-powered") - will you waste your time and effort to get food? Maybe you will - if you like the process of eating. Or maybe not - if you don't care or have other tasks. Now substitute the word "food" with "sex" - and you get the picture.

Don't get me wrong.
When God blessed Adam and Eve to be fruitful. He gave them everything they needed and if the first sex came through Adam and Eve the pleasure won't be like we see now but the first intercourse happened through satan brainwashed Eve that's what lead to the intoxicating flashy enjoyment of sex.
Thats what I am saying.

if we for one second jump into the philosophy that god made humans

and we go with suzanne 5223 saying sex is not for pleasure,
then why did god give suzanne a clitoris, g-pot and hormones

biology shows that we naturally have body parts that feel pleasure, hormones that maximise that pleasure..
however its WORDS of religious priests that are telling people that sex is bad

so the only words that go against nature, are those in religion that tell people not to do what comes natural

Man will always take sex as an intoxicating flashy enjoyment because when God created Adam and Eve sex did not happen during the time God plan it. It happened when satan brainwash Eve.
If you see any man intoxicating flashy enjoyment this is the reason.

Yes, men can live without sex but not forever.

Get busy with making money especially crypto mining and other important matter.

Exactly,sex is a thing of pleasure but men abuse it nowadays not minding the consequencies involved.
Rape is now very common among people because it's not everybody that have access to sex,some persons only have sex by opportunity,and when they see the chance,they turn it into rape.

Honestly, it can be controlled easily without hearing erotic stories and seeing these lovely ladies on the internet nowadays. It's hard to restrain and that's why if you have the means, you need to get yourself a lovely wife that will take care of everything for you when you are hungry with that. That's the easiest thing to do rather than looking at the things you won't ever get that would make yourself, even more, hungrier than before. I hope everyone can get married easily without any complicated problem because this is one of the main problems of the boys when getting married is hard and you need to be rich to be able to afford it.

More research is required. We don't actually know what the link is, only that more woman have reported menstral issues after taking the vaccine than before.

https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/coronavirus-covid-19-vaccine-adverse-reactions/coronavirus-vaccine-summary-of-yellow-card-reporting#annex-1-vaccine-analysis-print

See the numerous reports pertaining to menstrual issues.

I am not saying these issues are statistically significant, but again, as with anything vaccine related, to categorically reject the notion that there could be side effects to the vaccine that are currently unknown is to pretend that we know the long term side effects of vaccines. We don't.

And btw, Dr. Malone has plenty of patents pertaining to mRNA technology, I don't think his disgruntled wife changes that.

Yeah Yeah, A man does knows what he wants, he simply has to take the best decision that suits him.
This Generation seems to like sex more than anything,this more important than the loyalty in the generation..... having sex is good but such a pleasure should be shared amongst someone you love, fifteen minutes of sex with someone you don't love is useless.

R.malone is about as much of an inventor of medical technology as faketoshi Wright is bitcoin technology

R malone's "proof" of involvement is this
https://static1.squarespace.com/static/550b0ac4e4b0c16cdea1b084/t/60b62e4f1dcb1f52ad2d4c0c/1622552143483/Jill%27s+letter+about+RNA+vaccination+generic+v5+June2021.pdf
its a letter wrote by his wife.(facepalm)

she references work done by others where she "says" that R. malone was referenced in the work
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC280161/pdf/pnas00261-0279.pdf
but the reference is a B malone(different person) who showed financial interest in the experiments not any physical involvement or insight that changed the experiments purpose.

sorry but its not the same malone. and nothing to do with the antivaxxer R.malone who is just doing a faketoshi in the medical world.

the vaccine does not mess with the menstrual cycle. please close your conspiracy bookmarked pages and remove the tin foil hat.
if it did mess with it. there would be 125million american women (women=50% of all 250mill americans vaccinated) that are having period issues for the last year.
the vaccine goes in the arm not the womb

For some cultures, sex isn't enjoyment, they just do it to pump out as many offspring as they possibly can. Jewish communities in particular will have as much children as they can because it's in their own self interest to procreate. And if I remember correctly, a few Jewish communities might have even prohibited the Covid vaccine for children because of menstrual cycle issues some of the lipid nanoparticles are causing (this, according to Dr. Robert Malone, creator of mRNA therapeutic technology).

this may become another topic of debate. but its where some argue about the 'child support' where the consent of sex also forms a agreement to provide child support by default of just the act of sex, even if the 'father' doesnt want the child but the mother decides to keep the kid. (hinting about abortion law debates also)

i believe if a woman gets pregnant. and she wishes to keep the baby. she has to file a court order to put the father on the birth certificate which involves actually informing him that she is pregnant. this way there is no nasty surprise a year later "hi, give me money you have a 3 month old son"
if both consent all well and good the man pays child support or becomes part of the childs life with custody agreements or being a partner with the mother.
however, the man can then in court decline his name being put on a birth certificate officially by declaring he doesnt want the baby. this means women are not forced into an abortion by the man. but instead the man aborts(not literally) his responsibility of supporting a baby he does not want. and the woman can continue the pregnancy as a single parent.

the same goes the other way. if the man wants to keep the baby but the woman doesnt. he has to provide payment for the "surrogate" to bring the baby to term. whereby she can agree and hand custody to the man on the babies birth. or decline and not go through with it.

then the 'weaponising' can be stopped. and no surprise shoot-outs when its too late to defend yourself
in short. if there is any dispute of responsibilities and custody. .. settle it in court before names are put on birth certificates

There are 2 things to remember: psychology and physiology.

Physiologically you may need it once in a while even though nothing wrong will happen if you don't (except your abilities in that part will decline) or have it a bit more often - your body will adjust to that.

Psychologically you can want it "all the time" unless you have more urgent and/or interesting things in your life - like hobbies/work/hunger/etc. A dog starts licking his dick when he has nothing to do. If you follow your "desires" completely - this may not end well for your physiology either.
Sometimes you may be in need of attention and care more than anything else.

I agree sex is not the problem, but, the way I see it, the problem is people using sex as a weapon.
I can understand if a teenage girl "makes a mistake" and gets pregnant. But a cousin of mine got married to a 30 year old student of medicine, who "didn't know"... 
I mean, really?

Don't  get me wrong: as far as I'm concerned, they're both at fault here. She's a bitch, and he's an asshole. But bitch or not, if a woman gets pregnant from me, she's gonna get enough money to raise my kid like royalty, and I will be the best father I can be, but she's not getting a ring, EVER. 

I feel like this is on a case-by-case basis. but just like what suchmoon has said that "men have figured out to take matters into their own hands"(literally). as for my personal experience, when the urge arose I satisfy myself. you don't need to have a partner to satisfy the urge.

sex is not the problem .. the relationship/commitment is.
the drama of debate and conversation in a relationship should not be a reason to abstain.. it should be a reason to not commit yourself to long term relationships.

i am not religious, but i do like to use religious theology against religious people.
so..
FREE WILL has been given to us all to make our own choices, where forgiveness is always given to those who have done no harm to others.. so no harm no foul in having consensual multiple friends with benefits, no strings attached.

..
i do enjoy laughing when i see religious people preach 'freewill and forgiveness' whilst also preaching contradictory "die sinner die"

Yeah, all the religious bullshit aside, biologically men can live for years without sex, especially after having a scare of the "marriage" kind. Some women tend to think tricking men into marriage is a valid tactic. I disagree.
In any case, I have voluntarily abstained from sex for the last 7 years, and I'm still kicking. Not a lot of fun though...

It may be, you can try and tell us about your experience

Jerking. What else do we do but what jerking  

When your dick got problems like erection dysfunction, youll have no sex anymore. But you'll live.

When you finally have a wife and you got bored with your wife anymore, you probaby will prefer watching porn on tubes than having sex.
A friend enjoys more with porn than with her wife lol Some men that cant control will just go out and find a hooker.

sex is not meant purely for procreation.

biology put things into humans like sensations, hormones, urges.. offering pleasure, happiness and contentment.
this is nature, natural and biological fact from millions of years AGO
meaning sex is natural and pleasurable before religion said no

its only HUMAN politics and religious law that then limited sex to be portrayed as purely for procreation

what you learn is that history shows that before religion people had pleasure, people had vices.
but with that came the risk of spreading diseases and causing harm via non-consensual sex(rape)

so laws(religious scripts) were created to limit these. and over time religious extremists took these safeguards too far and made sex sound like its evil and should be avoided at all costs.

..
sex for pleasure is not 'contemporary' or 'modern', it is INFACT older and more natural than the religious script propaganda
religion is actually the 'contemporary and modern' change to civilisation.. not sex.

you can spot that religion is contemporary, and that religious laws were based on safe sex. because ever since condoms were invented and awareness of asking consent religions changed their stance on their laws and made it so gay, unmarried, sex is no longer a sin(against their law)