Monetization is similar to what YouTube is doing. But then, how can tweets compete with videos in YouTube? I am still confused regarding how Elon is going to turn Twitter into a profitable venture. Unlike the case with YouTube and Facebook, Twitter is not that suitable for monetization. Most of the users spend only a few seconds to read each tweet, and you can't insert advertisements in between. One option is to do that for the Twitter videos. But Twitter is primarily for micro-blogging and videos are not that popular in that platform.
I thought X Twitter would turn into a platform like Tik Tok or something. Apart from changing the appearance of micro-blogging to a platform that can share videos of long duration and can be monetized, it is possible that in the near future Twitter will be able to do live streaming for users as well.
Next, I think Twitter will completely change its form to become an E-Commers Platform like Tik Tok, and that is very likely to happen because one of the platforms that is very trendy and has a complete feature for its users today is Tik Tok.
Well... but, "X" has everything you are mentioning, all of that exists on the platform, even pioneers of everything you mention, hence, that Tiktoc , so, they are the ones that copied them, the only relevant thing in tiktoc was that they brought the videos vertical to dominance over Horizontal videos, everything else already existed on other platforms.
Making a horizontal video is not as easy as the vertical one, at least in its final result and tiktoc offered this, that is the great advantage that it took from its main adversaries, Telegram and YouTube.
On the other hand, what "X" is looking for is "reengineering" and what a brand that wants to get out of the stagnation it has should do, since that social network does not grow but they do maintain a reliable following of around 500 million..."botox".
In other words, Twitter is injecting "botox".