Topic: CanaryInTheMine is further abusing the trust system [Fixed] - page 3. (Read 4457 times)

No answer. So we established dogie is a liar.

Liar, where did I call you a thief ?

Its the other way around. I conclusively and undeniably proved to ST that their accusations were false, and responded by ramming their head in the sand. That's not my problem.

By crazy rampage you mean stopped trying to reason with you because they saw that it was a helpless cause, as MANY of those who peruse Hardware have come to the same conclusion?

It's statements like these that make people question your integrity as a self-proclaimed neutral reviewer of mining hardware/companies.  You pass off half-opinion, half-fact statements as if they are gospel, and when called out on it play the run-around game without answering questions directly.  More importantly, even when proven wrong you hardly ever come clean or apologize to those you offend.

Am I right to understand that Bitmain is not expressing interest in renewing any contracts with you for upcoming hardware? Maybe instead of using that tired-out index finger around here, you should start looking in the mirror.  The "Woe is Dogie" act is getting has gotten old, even in the short time I've been around here.  Even when you present plausible concerns, it is nearly impossible to take you seriously, because everything you say and do around here has been quite seemingly self-interested.  You claim to no longer be making advertising revenue, have you considered that maybe it has to do with the way you conduct yourself around here, and that people no longer want to attach their branding to your posting?

Edit: SP-Tech posted while I was typing, but everything stated is completely valid.

Don't drag me into your shit.

That's not how it works. Because you don't like me you've excluded me from everyone's trust lists, and your answer to that the other 465,409 members can still add me manually? Well, at least we've removed all doubt that you should be removed from DefaultTrust, because either you don't understand it (and make no effort to) or are willingly abusing it.

And I'll ask again:

Anyone can add him to their trust list if they wish.

Its amazing how quick you are to jump on what you think is the winning ship. My actions and values have not changed in the last month since Spondoolies decided to go on a crazy rampage, nor the 10 months since you left that rating. But the second that I temporarily lose the ability to affect your rating, you withdraw your positive one and threaten a negative rating.

What a coward.

Reviewed it earlier.


Please check a dictionary about the word "spam" or use a search engine like Google.


Done.


Which companies? What type of "degrade"? Where did he do it?


So you trust CITM on his each and every action?


Where, when and to whom did he do it?


He hasn't given proof.


Proof needed. But this isn't about his trust lost. Many of them trust dogie but because of CITM's action, they will see dogie's trust feedback as 'untrusted'.


But we are not, IMHO. Maybe SaltySpitoon also thinks "no":



You might be right in this.


"Certain companies"! I am seeing this for quite sometime. Which? Why? When? Where?

Who are these "plenty people"? Alts? FYI: Persons who tell the truth will always be hatred to others who want to hide it.*

* I am neither saying dogie is telling truth nor saying you or CITM or "plenty people" is trying to hide the truth.

Feel free to REVIEW Dogie's transgressions as you say I have to review CITM's. Let me know when you are done.
Feel free to explain to me why his SPAMMING threads in order to develop business is a good thing. Let me know when you are done.
Feel free to REVIEW Dogie's concerted efforts to degrade certain companies in an effort to promote his own agenda. Let me know when you are done.

I do not have to do any more than ask you to do a more thorough review of Dogie's posts and efforts in these forums including his own abuse of the trust system against those who have rightly pointed out as CITM's has that he has lied about certain companies in the hardware threads. That is fair reason to pull him from any trust system. If we are basing on that criteria he is well within his right to do so. Again I have not seen anything that couldn't be resolved with a discussion with CITM. Dogie is being more than disingenuous here given there are plenty of people in these forums that would agree he is not to be trusted given his posts about certain companies.

Again let me be clear. I just removed the positive rating I had for Dogie as it is no longer relevant given his transgressions over the past few months. I am seriously entertaining the idea of a negative rating given this is the sort of weak effort to bring people down rather than fix his own issues with trust. Seriously there are few people reading the hardware threads these days that can't see through the BS he is trying pass off as reviews and work for certain companies. It is beyond me why it has taken this long for someone to do this. Nothing shocking in it whatsoever.

He invested a lot of time to create them and it is helpful for many(most) of them. He should earn a small amount from it dor his work. He could have earned much more if he did it for a company or similar. He has the knowledge too. When doing a thing, value isn't for the work but for the knowledge. For example, if you are repairing a hardware, you can see they remove something, they know somethings, they add some etc... Anybody can do such things but they can't remove/add/fix the right one without the *knowledge*.


Look carefully. You will see.


This might be right but he must keep an eye on trust feedback of people on his trust list.


Show me "abuses" of dogie! Thank you!

Edit:


As long as the person in your trust list isn't abusing the trust system, he is good to stay there.

You honestly think I'd accept so much abuse to run a community resource wrongly in order to gain $40 $0 a month? That doesn't make sense...



Users (like you) flaming me, telling me to go kill myself is not something I can control. They're either evil people or not.



Have you read anything I've presented? He has clearly abused the trust system, NOT discussed the issues and has straight up refused to address any problems.



....Which are?

Which "several manufacturers", what "misconduct"? And that is not the method nor venue of how to "not to trust" people.

I'll let you reply to this before I submit any evidence as maybe you have a different conspiracy theory today.