Topic: Canelo vs Jacobs - page 3. (Read 781 times)

Quote from: Rufsilf on April 28, 2019, 05:19:57 PM

I stopped watching boxing after Gennady Golovkin was cheated of a victory not once, but twice against Canelo Alvarez. What is the point in watching these matches if the best fighter is not the one who is going to win? The jury will select the winner, no matter whether he performs well or not. Hopefully the jury will be neutral this time, as Jacobs is American.

Nope, I don't think that the jury will be neutral. Canelo Alvarez has enjoyed the support of the judges just like what we witnessed in their fight with Gennady Golovkin so I would not be surprised at all if we are going to see it again against the American.

That's why Jacobs should finished the fight and KO Canelo and try to broke that granite chin, it might be difficult but not impossible.

The fight will be happening in Las Vegas, and if the jury is stupid enough to favor Canelo over an American national, then it will create quite a few problems for the organizers. I am neither favoring Jacobs, nor Canelo. I want the jury to be neutral and award the match to the best fighter (in case either of the fighters are not able to KO their opponent).

It will happened in US during Cinco-de-Mayo, a Mexican day celebration.

https://www.boxingscene.com/canelo-alvarez-daniel-jacobs-nsac-approves-judges-fight--138305

Quote

As BoxingScene.com first reported last week, Jacobs’ team vehemently objected to Adalaide Byrd’s inclusion in the pool of available judges submitted to both camps by Bennett. Jacobs’ team also expressed opposition to Trella working his middleweight title unification fight against Alvarez.

So you see, Jacobs camp are very choosy we will be the judge for this fight because they know that they have a disadvantage even though your argument is that the fight is in US soil and involves US fighter. But obviously Jacobs camp knows that Canelo Alvarez has a history of being favored in a close fight, just like we have seen in the first GGG vs Canelo in which majority saw GGG winning, but the judges see differently.

btc_angela

hero member

Activity: 2660

Merit: 551

Quote from: Netnox on April 28, 2019, 12:40:35 PM

Quote from: Netnox on April 28, 2019, 12:40:35 PM

I stopped watching boxing after Gennady Golovkin was cheated of a victory not once, but twice against Canelo Alvarez. What is the point in watching these matches if the best fighter is not the one who is going to win? The jury will select the winner, no matter whether he performs well or not. Hopefully the jury will be neutral this time, as Jacobs is American.

Nope, I don't think that the jury will be neutral. Canelo Alvarez has enjoyed the support of the judges just like what we witnessed in their fight with Gennady Golovkin so I would not be surprised at all if we are going to see it again against the American.

That's why Jacobs should finished the fight and KO Canelo and try to broke that granite chin, it might be difficult but not impossible.

The fight will be happening in Las Vegas, and if the jury is stupid enough to favor Canelo over an American national, then it will create quite a few problems for the organizers. I am neither favoring Jacobs, nor Canelo. I want the jury to be neutral and award the match to the best fighter (in case either of the fighters are not able to KO their opponent).

It could a tough bout for Jacobs, Canelo Alvarez have that advantage with his fighting experience. Remembering how he fought and beat GGV, this shows that he have that strong punch which could probably be used their fight.
Anyways, boxing is not all about how strong you are but it is also in the right timing. Strategies and can figured out how the opponents work in actual event.

I still think that GGG won the first win and the second can go either direction. So it's a hard fought match but I'm not convince that Alvarez really beat GGG in my ends. Daniel Jacobs is the fight that I think will give Alvarez a difficult fight, more than GGG, imo.

Rufsilf

sr. member

Activity: 1778

Merit: 309

I stopped watching boxing after Gennady Golovkin was cheated of a victory not once, but twice against Canelo Alvarez. What is the point in watching these matches if the best fighter is not the one who is going to win? The jury will select the winner, no matter whether he performs well or not. Hopefully the jury will be neutral this time, as Jacobs is American.

Nope, I don't think that the jury will be neutral. Canelo Alvarez has enjoyed the support of the judges just like what we witnessed in their fight with Gennady Golovkin so I would not be surprised at all if we are going to see it again against the American.

That's why Jacobs should finished the fight and KO Canelo and try to broke that granite chin, it might be difficult but not impossible.

The fight will be happening in Las Vegas, and if the jury is stupid enough to favor Canelo over an American national, then it will create quite a few problems for the organizers. I am neither favoring Jacobs, nor Canelo. I want the jury to be neutral and award the match to the best fighter (in case either of the fighters are not able to KO their opponent).

It could a tough bout for Jacobs, Canelo Alvarez have that advantage with his fighting experience. Remembering how he fought and beat GGV, this shows that he have that strong punch which could probably be used their fight.
Anyways, boxing is not all about how strong you are but it is also in the right timing. Strategies and can figured out how the opponents work in actual event.

Netnox

legendary

Activity: 2044

Merit: 1008

I stopped watching boxing after Gennady Golovkin was cheated of a victory not once, but twice against Canelo Alvarez. What is the point in watching these matches if the best fighter is not the one who is going to win? The jury will select the winner, no matter whether he performs well or not. Hopefully the jury will be neutral this time, as Jacobs is American.

Nope, I don't think that the jury will be neutral. Canelo Alvarez has enjoyed the support of the judges just like what we witnessed in their fight with Gennady Golovkin so I would not be surprised at all if we are going to see it again against the American.

That's why Jacobs should finished the fight and KO Canelo and try to broke that granite chin, it might be difficult but not impossible.

The fight will be happening in Las Vegas, and if the jury is stupid enough to favor Canelo over an American national, then it will create quite a few problems for the organizers. I am neither favoring Jacobs, nor Canelo. I want the jury to be neutral and award the match to the best fighter (in case either of the fighters are not able to KO their opponent).

Jating

hero member

Activity: 2842

Merit: 772

Quote from: coin-investor on April 25, 2019, 08:09:24 AM

I stopped watching boxing after Gennady Golovkin was cheated of a victory not once, but twice against Canelo Alvarez. What is the point in watching these matches if the best fighter is not the one who is going to win? The jury will select the winner, no matter whether he performs well or not. Hopefully the jury will be neutral this time, as Jacobs is American.

Nope, I don't think that the jury will be neutral. Canelo Alvarez has enjoyed the support of the judges just like what we witnessed in their fight with Gennady Golovkin so I would not be surprised at all if we are going to see it again against the American.

That's why Jacobs should finished the fight and KO Canelo and try to broke that granite chin, it might be difficult but not impossible.

smyslov

sr. member

Activity: 2030

Merit: 269

My bet is on Canelo, I have seen how explosives he is on all his fights, he is in contention to become one of mexico's greatest boxer, he should go against top guys in his division and the next higher division if he can get through that weight, and of course he should beat Jacobs in a grand fashion, just like what Bud has done to Khan.

Fredomago

legendary

Activity: 2996

Merit: 1054

Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform

Well after the announcement I made an assignment to check Dany Jacobs, honestly, he is unknown to me, he is an unpopular champion, and after watching some of his fights, my bet is on Canelo, the guy does not have a real punching power, it took a lot of punch coming from him to knock his opponent out.

Just like you, I don't heard anything from Jacob yet so needs to review his previous fight and learned about his skills, but upon checking, Canelo
still have some edge against him, though this rising fighter can surprise us, but personally I'll go with Canelo as experienced will give him the benefits
of staying and keeping his belts.

Netnox

legendary

Activity: 2044

Merit: 1008

I stopped watching boxing after Gennady Golovkin was cheated of a victory not once, but twice against Canelo Alvarez. What is the point in watching these matches if the best fighter is not the one who is going to win? The jury will select the winner, no matter whether he performs well or not. Hopefully the jury will be neutral this time, as Jacobs is American.

DeathAngel

legendary

Activity: 3304

Merit: 1617

#1 VIP Crypto Casino

Canelo is a machine, no way he loses this fight. He’ll win it convincingly I think & probably in an early round.

samputin

sr. member

Activity: 1036

Merit: 294

I don't know about you guys, but I have that attitude of wanting the underdog to win. I just want to oppose the majority. Cheesy

Anyways, yes, Canelo is the favorite in this match but bettors should not underestimate the underdog which, in this square off, is Jacobs. According to gambling.com, "Jacobs is a fast and powerful middleweight who really knows how to get his punches off. He’s excellent at setting the pace of fights, and he’s adept at winning them through multiple strategies." But, after all, the decision will depend on the judges. So may the best fighter win.

mirakal

legendary

Activity: 3108

Merit: 1290

Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform

Quote from: mich on April 25, 2019, 11:10:49 PM

Quote from: mirakal on April 25, 2019, 02:23:19 AM

Maybe change the title to 'Canelo' since more people know him by that name then his real name Alvarez Wink

You have a point there buddy.

Quote from: mirakal on April 25, 2019, 02:23:19 AM

There is a very big chance this match contests to the decision so my only play will me to consider the over prop when it becomes available.

I will it will go to decision and whenever that happens, I'd like to bet on the underdog since it gives good odds to gamblers.

Nice to see the title of this thread was changed now it should get more replies
If you bet on the underdog in this match you can get good odds but this is Canelo we are talking about.
Canelo only decision loss ever is to. Are you ready. FLOYD MAYWEATHER!

Don't worry, I am not too interested in this game, I'll only be betting a small amount just for fan and hope there is an upset.

Things could happen, dogs are more motivated in the fight so one lucky punch could end the game and I'll enjoy my winning, but don't really expect that. win or loss as long as they show some real entertainment, unlike FLOYD fights, that would be fine with me, I can accept loses all days as I know I can win it back in other sports.

mich

legendary

Activity: 3122

Merit: 1032

#1 VIP Crypto Casino

Maybe change the title to 'Canelo' since more people know him by that name then his real name Alvarez Wink

You have a point there buddy.