Good job, better performance than Dagger, profit is better with one Vega 64.
I got 1877H/s with the followed setting with my MSI Vega 64.
Core Frequency: -10.5%
Memory Clock: 1025 MHz
Power Limit: -23%
Don't know if i must adjust this, or just close all, or anything else.
Sometime i got 1900, but never 2000. The power consumption is not my first priority, just get the best hashrate.
About consumption, i check without miner, 285W (for the total of PC) during mining, 460W. So 175W at full ??
Topic: [Cast XMR] high speed XMR/CryptoNight miner for RX Vega GPUs (2 KHash/s) - page 153. (Read 206406 times)
October 14, 2017, 10:15:51 AM
October 14, 2017, 10:03:29 AM
Please try:
"--opencl 1 -G 0"
October 14, 2017, 09:41:54 AM
so this is working only with 1 gpu?
1 GPU per instance, yes.
But you can run as many instances as you like.
So start a new terminal and run "cast_xmr -S [server] -u [wallet address] -G 1" to start a second instance mining on your second GPU and so on for 3rd GPU....
and the hashrates are same? Can anyone tell the hashrate on card with not enabled HBCC?
October 14, 2017, 06:00:08 AM
so this is working only with 1 gpu?
1 GPU per instance, yes.
But you can run as many instances as you like.
So start a new terminal and run "cast_xmr -S [server] -u [wallet address] -G 1" to start a second instance mining on your second GPU and so on for 3rd GPU....
October 14, 2017, 05:48:12 AM
"-G x" dont working
-G select the GPU
with
"--opencl x" one selects the openCL plattform, default x=0 which in your case seems to be the Intel OpenCL driver.
Please try:
"--opencl 1 -G 0"
October 14, 2017, 05:29:15 AM
so this is working only with 1 gpu?
October 14, 2017, 05:02:58 AM
October 14, 2017, 04:20:08 AM
Only supporting single GPU per instance is a huge issue. Also, do you plan on adding an api, or at least remote webpage?
Ok, planning to support multiple GPU per instance. Personally found that running on instance per GPU very stable and more flexible, but there seem some reports that it does influence the other GPUs. Should be no big deal to implement.
Which kind of API would you suggest? Is there an standard?
October 14, 2017, 04:13:10 AM
Yes, it is faster than xmr-stak-amd by 50-70 H/s for a single card (1925-1950 H/s) but I start a second copy, the performance of the first one drops by 200 H/s to 1750 H/s. Do you see this?
hm, is "AMD CrossFire" turned off?
I am testing with a Vega 56 and 64 in parallel, sorry, can't reproduce. Both keep there hash rates and don't mind if its neighbour is started or stopped.
same issue here, crossfire off, running 1 vega 64 and 1 vega 56 and hashrate drops as soon as second gpu starts.
October 14, 2017, 03:25:41 AM
Yes, it is faster than xmr-stak-amd by 50-70 H/s for a single card (1925-1950 H/s) but I start a second copy, the performance of the first one drops by 200 H/s to 1750 H/s. Do you see this?
hm, is "AMD CrossFire" turned off?
I am testing with a Vega 56 and 64 in parallel, sorry, can't reproduce. Both keep there hash rates and don't mind if its neighbour is started or stopped.
October 14, 2017, 02:17:12 AM
Any idea to support Nvidia too?
Use XMR-STAK-NVIDIA. 
October 14, 2017, 01:06:02 AM
Any idea to support Nvidia too?
October 13, 2017, 11:01:14 PM
Only supporting single GPU per instance is a huge issue. Also, do you plan on adding an api, or at least remote webpage?
October 13, 2017, 05:37:11 PM
Thanks, looks good!
October 13, 2017, 05:14:10 PM
Yes, it is faster than xmr-stak-amd by 50-70 H/s for a single card (1925-1950 H/s) but I start a second copy, the performance of the first one drops by 200 H/s to 1750 H/s. Do you see this?
October 13, 2017, 04:01:04 PM
Has anyone tried ??
I'm curious to see if we can finally find some big advantages to Vega
I'm curious to see if we can finally find some big advantages to Vega
October 13, 2017, 03:56:19 PM
-G 1 not support... 
October 13, 2017, 05:17:40 AM
has anyone tried this yet? How's the wattage from the wall?
2050 H/s on the screenshot looks nice, but what are teh settings of the card? AS its not that much higher than what can be done with xmr-stak.
Also, whats the hashrate without hbcc?
And 1.5% fee is a bit too much.
2050 H/s on the screenshot looks nice, but what are teh settings of the card? AS its not that much higher than what can be done with xmr-stak.
Also, whats the hashrate without hbcc?
And 1.5% fee is a bit too much.
October 13, 2017, 03:53:48 AM
do you plan release miner for polaris gpus too? some fresh blood for old cards would be nice 
October 13, 2017, 02:39:50 AM
Update to version 0.4
Cast XMR Version 0.4 (2017/10/13)
- performance optimizations result in 1 - 2% higher hash rates
- reduced dev fee to 1.5%
Cast XMR Version 0.4 (2017/10/13)
- performance optimizations result in 1 - 2% higher hash rates
- reduced dev fee to 1.5%
Jump to: