Topic: CCminer(SP-MOD) Modded NVIDIA Maxwell / Pascal kernels. - page 1024. (Read 2347601 times)

try to increase your virtual memory to something like 12000 mb



start, right click on computer - properties - advanced system settings - performance settings - advanced tab - virtual memory, hit change.

tick custom size and hit set 12000mb (make sure you have hdd space)

restart.

then try the miner again

Intensity of 21 used to work on my dual GTX 980, and I used to get 21,000 hash
now it crashes and I have to do 20
any ideas?

Xccel, that private miner is sold out. You might be able to convince/hire a dev to make another one for you though.
No more PM's stating interest please. My PM inbox just got a headache 

yey hits possible miner gpu for : https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1135151.640

no ...

the donation is for the private spreadcoin miner ...

the current ccminer does NOT have spreadx11 algo implemented in it ... yet ... at least not until sp puts in there ...

#crysx

So, need to donate 0.1 btc to owner for get working miner...

Probably the effect of all the multipools catching up. Any coin that is added to multipools will reach an equilibrium profitability wise pretty fast now. Fortunately there are coins under their radars.

And algos continuing down into the shitter...

Is there a new private miner out? It doesn't look like there is a massive increase in hash power on nicehash over the last month... Hash power has shifted between algos though.

Someone should actually make like a 'world hash' estimator based on global hashrate on nicehash normalized to one algo.

Just Spread coin.

Ahhh....  thanks for the explanation.   
For clarification.. would the private one be just spreadcoin or all algos?

Spreadcoin is not included in this fork. If you donate 0.1 btc I can send my private spreadcoin miner release 9 with  improved hashrate.

I have the same...

I tried to solo mine spread and got the error json_rpc_call faied.   
However, if I use the spreadminer it works and I get 1600K hash.

not entirely bensam ...

we have 6 of them in the rack at the moment and ALL of them are highly efficient as airflow systems - BUT with powerful fans ... ones in the back not as powerful as the front ... they are all chenbra and supermicro chassis and servers ... all of them are 'standard' servers not high heat miner systems ... yet ...

but for high heat dissipation systems like our miners - i must agree ... which is THE reason our frames that we are currently designing have a vacuum style of airlow in them - and it seems to be working ...

no leakage - now spaces - just a complete sealed system that forces airflow through two fans ... one powerful highflow fan in the front - one large lower powered one ( yet same airflow ) in the back ...

once this is perfected ( for our farm - cant speak for anyone else here ) - then we will move onto the funneling of the heat rich exhaust out of the room ...

though there isnt much an open air system cant do in comparison to a sealed one ... most of the farm is open air - and very fiddly to deal with ...

IF - and that is a big IF - we can get the design of the closed system close to a perfect airflow - then all should be well ... if not - then back to the open air system frames ...

either way - we are just testing when there is time ... i am very time poor at the moment due to personal issues that require my attention - but work on it every chance i get ...

im actually just wondering about the vertical style system of venting airflow also - though that also will require a complete design change ... and soon - the help that is here now will soon be gone - which will make it more a 'me' and 'i' rather than a 'we' ...

i see there are some major improvements to the ccminer-spmod fork also ( with some help from pallas and others ) - amongst other forks like epsylon3 and djm34 and klaust ... seems i need to get my ass moving to publish the donation servers and have them active ... they are working and running ( bar two sevrers which are being redone this week ) so some public use / testing would be great ...

ill update them here - https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/a-chainworks-industries-cwi-project-donate-by-mining-dbm-1089744 ... but will also do a quick notify here in this thread also when they are finished - for those interested in mining anonymously for donations for the aforementioned devs and others ...

#crysx

This is untrue. Cases are leaky and fans are inefficient as cases aren't designed as a sealed highflow system. You're better off with positive airflow then negative as it will leak throw the cracks in the case. You need more powerful fans to have the same effect in the back of the system as the front.

But yeah, rackmount systems generally have highflow fans on the front of them which are extremely noisy to push A/C air through them in data centers, which is why they're designed the way that they are. That doesn't work for home use.

not necessarily pallas ...

just a tunnel - or vacuum which automatically forces air through ...

it is beneficial for a powerful fan to be placed at the beginning - but not necessarily fundamental for the operation ...

a larger slower moving and less power consuming fan ion the back will suffice to keep the airflow moving at high rates ...

#crysx

You may need to turn on the OSD Panel under preferences as I downloaded the never version and it wasn't displayed.
You can right click on that panel once its up "config" and tick the option you'd like to see displayed.

No VPN/proxy here, I'm solo mining with in my network. I had just rebooted but the wallet was on the rig that was rebooted I'm guessing
since the IP address was threw my router back to the wallet was a delay problem. I had used a quick setup copy/paste of the *.bat and
IP address should have been changed to 127.0.0.1 & would probably lessened the delay of using the broad case IP of that same rig I use
on the others back to it. No matter it all worked out in the end. lol

On another note as per my other question a few pages back. Per versions and readout display.
Was the line in blue disabled or can that be turned back on in 56? Not that it really matters, I just liked seeing it.
Thanks all for your help.
Edit: Not really seeing any difference in speeds between the 3 versions 54,55,56 mining this coin..
56 does seem to produce a more stable all around speed, where as you may noted the other was jumping around a bit.

tyvm

If you're behind a VPN/proxy it's worth pinging the stratum which shows its IP and replacing the hostname with the IP so you won't get disconnected due to DNS issues.