CCminer(SP-MOD) Modded NVIDIA Maxwell / Pascal kernels. - page 1101.

bensam1231

legendary

Activity: 1764

Merit: 1024

Quote from: bathrobehero on May 06, 2015, 05:24:29 PM

Quote from: ?? on ??

Ouch! yaamp hitting quark with 8% fee.

This is not going to be popular but I have to say I like that. I think that serves people right for being lazy. I mean that fee at least incentivizes miners to do their research about what to mine instead of pretty much ruinning the prices of coins they don't even know existed. There are 4 quark coins being mined by yaamp and the combined daily volume of those coins are below 2 BTC and they are all going down:

Miners don't care about coins, they care about what is most profitable. When a new algo hits GPU miners (if it was only a CPU miner before) it will take a dive till the market reaches equilibrium with other mineable algos, like x11. The same goes for ASICs. When Scrypt hit ASICs it did the same exact thing. I don't think people who make algos realize how much influence they have on market values. It's all based around efficiency and hash per unit (like a 970).

Curiously are there any plans for improved support for Cryptonote? The algo is still quite healthy as is the market and the last update was from TSIV quite some time ago.

tbearhere

legendary

Activity: 3164

Merit: 1003

@sp On release 49 before your lastest changes I'm getting about 1 mh/s more on my 750ti rig about 6.2mh/s per card oc.
I need a windows compiled r49 7z zip file with your last minute fixes and hashrates please.
Thx
Here are a some beers. Wink

.05 BTC TrxID: 8c80858b6e9fe953cfa6fc68eaeaa8574bb5253805291be39cf100370a40d68c

Grout

full member

Activity: 139

Merit: 100

Quote from: sp_ on May 08, 2015, 09:26:20 AM

Yes. I need some more beers:)

Works in solomining. Low rates on the multipools because of a stratum/nounce bug

One beer coming your way, hope it won't get too shaken up during transit :-)
Transaction ID: bd4c54bf3079039d6c02737b9c2cc3c5e79dc88160b696a9563279036d3cd5e3

hashbrown9000

sr. member

Activity: 427

Merit: 250

@SP_, what are your stable o/c settings for the gigabyte 750ti cards? I use +200 on gpu and -150 on mem. it gets me about +1MH/s in Quark. but the rig uses about 15 watts more total versus stock clocks.

tbearhere

legendary

Activity: 3164

Merit: 1003

Quote from: sp_ on May 08, 2015, 09:26:20 AM

Quote from: tbearhere on May 08, 2015, 07:49:48 AM

Quote from: sp_ on May 07, 2015, 02:23:04 PM

New world record for quark on the 750ti

yaamp.com:4033 quark block 1621936
GPU #1: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 6992
GPU #0: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 9895
GPU #0: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 8825
GPU #1: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 6487
-g 5 -i 22 standard clocks.

@ sp
Do you have that compiled for windows 8.1
And if I don't use the -g -i ect and just oc will I get about the same results ?
Thx
ps It's time to donate again.

Yes. I need some more beers:)

Works in solomining. Low rates on the multipools because of a stratum/nounce bug

Do you have that compiled for windows 8.1? I mean the r49 with those updates.

sp_

legendary

Activity: 2926

Merit: 1087

Team Black developer

Quote from: tbearhere on May 08, 2015, 07:49:48 AM

Quote from: sp_ on May 07, 2015, 02:23:04 PM

New world record for quark on the 750ti

yaamp.com:4033 quark block 1621936
GPU #1: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 6992
GPU #0: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 9895
GPU #0: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 8825
GPU #1: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 6487
-g 5 -i 22 standard clocks.

@ sp
Do you have that compiled for windows 8.1
And if I don't use the -g -i ect and just oc will I get about the same results ?
Thx
ps It's time to donate again.

Yes. I need some more beers:)

Works in solomining. Low rates on the multipools because of a stratum/nounce bug

tbearhere

legendary

Activity: 3164

Merit: 1003

Quote from: sp_ on May 07, 2015, 02:23:04 PM

New world record for quark on the 750ti

yaamp.com:4033 quark block 1621936
GPU #1: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 6992
GPU #0: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 9895
GPU #0: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 8825
GPU #1: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 6487

-g 5 -i 22 standard clocks.

@ sp
Do you have that compiled for windows 8.1
And if I don't use the -g -i ect and just oc will I get about the same results ?
Thx
ps It's time to donate again.

arpika

newbie

Activity: 14

Merit: 0

Maybe I discovered some type of error...
After pool has solved some blocks very quickly ccminer hashrate drops radically and one of my cards stops (in this case #1)
Although one card stopped accepted hasrate is the same by ccminer. Pool hasrate drops so one card has really stopped.
Default speed, no -g, linux, 6*750ti.

http://s5.postimg.org/6dsaphgh3/ccm.jpg

I think this is only about quark algo.

sp_

legendary

Activity: 2926

Merit: 1087

Team Black developer

yes. I messure only the total hash and divide on all the cards. 250-500 increase in the total hash, but the individual hashrates fluctate more.
Note that I have also removed some bugs in the hashrate calculation on github. Release 49(exe) is giving wrong values with the -g parameter.

bathrobehero

legendary

Activity: 2002

Merit: 1051

ICO? Not even once.

Quote from: sp_ on May 08, 2015, 12:17:59 AM

On the gigabyte oc 750ti(win32) -g 5 -i 21.8 is showing +250-500Khash in the miner, but on the pool -1Mhash or more because of the rejects/fees.

I'm not sure about the legitimicy of the speed increase. The hashrate reports doesn't factor in the overall time it took to produce the hashes.

What I mean is the hashrate reports with the -g parameter are happening individually:

I think with the -g parameter a different hashrate calculation method is needed that calculates the true hashrate, based on the actual time it took to produce it from all the threads. The best approach might be a small moving average that reports the hashrate like every 5 seconds or so and not based on when a thread is finished because some threads are faster than others.

sp_

legendary

Activity: 2926

Merit: 1087

Team Black developer

Quote from: opus.224 on May 08, 2015, 03:45:41 AM

I was wondering the same. We're mining the coin at block ~1,620,000. What is that coin??
MUE @ 660,000
SRC @ 865,000
DIME @ 820,000
QRK @ 1,960,000
BTQ @ 1,143,000
BITCRY @ 93,500
There are few less known quark coins, some dead, but none @ 1,620,000

are you sure?

- Dimecoin
- Molecule
- Atom
- SecondsCoin
- Union Coin
- SecureCoin
- Frozen
- RVDCoin
- Cthulhu
- Particle
- ZurCoin
- C-Notes
- Photon
- Bull Coin
- FairQuark (really?)
- MiniCoin
- PlatinumCoin
- RandomQuark
- BitQuark
- QuarkBar
- Probe - See more at: http://www.quarkcoins.com/quark-clones.html#sthash.8FZWdBhD.dpuf

chrysophylax

legendary

Activity: 2912

Merit: 1091

--- ChainWorks Industries ---

Quote from: sp_ on May 08, 2015, 04:23:41 AM

Quote from: chrysophylax on May 08, 2015, 03:44:22 AM

for some reason - the stratum is forcing a change in the diff level ... even though the diff has been set to 0.04 ...
extranonce changes maybe? ...
edit - found the issue ... the stratum proxy can allow the worker passwords to be forwarded rather than its own ( which is why d=0.04 wasnt working ) ...
no that the miner password is being forwarded to the pool - the diff level is 0.04 ...
lets see if it stays that way now ...
edit - nup ... its westhash forcing it to change diff ...
working on it to see if there is a way of doing it ...
#crysx

Wich setting are you using? the -g switch?

I have made a new switch '-e' that will turn of the extranounce subscription. Nicehash/westhash doesn't seem to like it because it keeps disconnecting/restart the miner connection, and then you get more rejects.

no - no -g ...

my command ( in script ) under linux ...

./ccminer -o stratum+tcp://donate.granitecoinx.com:7919/ -u chrysophylax.cm002 -p d=0.04 -a quark -r 3 -R 10 ...

originally this ...

./ccminer -o stratum+tcp://donate.granitecoinx.com:7919/ -O chrysophylax.cm002:x -a quark -r 3 -R 10 ...

ive changed the miner to this now ...

./ccminer -o stratum+tcp://stratum.westhash.com:3345/ -u 1CTiNJyoUmbdMRACtteRWXhGqtSETYd6Vd -p d=0.04 -a quark -r 3 -R 10 ...

to check whether mining directly will force the diff change ... and it doesnt ...

seems westhash does its own thing ... currently at 0.08 difficulty ...

changing it back to the donation link now ...

#crysx

sp_

legendary

Activity: 2926

Merit: 1087

Team Black developer

Quote from: chrysophylax on May 08, 2015, 03:44:22 AM

for some reason - the stratum is forcing a change in the diff level ... even though the diff has been set to 0.04 ...
extranonce changes maybe? ...
edit - found the issue ... the stratum proxy can allow the worker passwords to be forwarded rather than its own ( which is why d=0.04 wasnt working ) ...
no that the miner password is being forwarded to the pool - the diff level is 0.04 ...
lets see if it stays that way now ...
edit - nup ... its westhash forcing it to change diff ...
working on it to see if there is a way of doing it ...
#crysx

Wich setting are you using? the -g switch?

I have made a new switch '-e' that will turn of the extranounce subscription. Nicehash/westhash doesn't seem to like it because it keeps disconnecting/restart the miner connection, and then you get more rejects.

opus.224

full member

Activity: 247

Merit: 100

Quote from: 5w00p on May 08, 2015, 01:59:42 AM

Thanks for all the hard work, sp_.

Hey, what coin(s) are the buyers of hashpower at west/nice hash and yaamp mining? Specifically, Quark algorithm, as I believe DASH is one of the most popular for X11.

I mean, if they see it as wise to pay to have other people's rigs mine for them, I am interested in what coin(s) they are seeing as worth it.

Anyone? Bueller?

I was wondering the same. We're mining the coin at block ~1,620,000. What is that coin??
MUE @ 660,000
SRC @ 865,000
DIME @ 820,000
QRK @ 1,960,000
BTQ @ 1,143,000
BITCRY @ 93,500

There are few less known quark coins, some dead, but none @ 1,620,000

chrysophylax

legendary

Activity: 2912

Merit: 1091

--- ChainWorks Industries ---

for some reason - the stratum is forcing a change in the diff level ... even though the diff has been set to 0.04 ...

extranonce changes maybe? ...

edit - found the issue ... the stratum proxy can allow the worker passwords to be forwarded rather than its own ( which is why d=0.04 wasnt working ) ...

no that the miner password is being forwarded to the pool - the diff level is 0.04 ...

lets see if it stays that way now ...

edit - nup ... its westhash forcing it to change diff ...

working on it to see if there is a way of doing it ...

#crysx

chrysophylax

legendary

Activity: 2912

Merit: 1091

--- ChainWorks Industries ---

Quote from: sp_ on May 08, 2015, 03:23:41 AM

New spike in the hashrate. 62MHASH. That is 10,33 MHASH per card

The average rate is growing slowly. 35.14MHASH now. getting closer to the miner output wich is 36..

the spike was probably from the restart of the stratum proxy ...

lots of shares being accepted really quickly ...

but is starting to stabilize ...

im averaging 33500KH here on the miner ...

[2015-05-08 18:01:30] accepted: 796/999 (79.68%), 33506 khash/s yay!!!

#crysx

sp_

legendary

Activity: 2926

Merit: 1087

Team Black developer

New spike in the hashrate. 62MHASH. That is 10,33 MHASH per card

The average rate is growing slowly. 35.14MHASH now. getting closer to the miner output wich is 36..

chrysophylax

legendary

Activity: 2912

Merit: 1091

--- ChainWorks Industries ---

ok - d=0.04 set for testing on westhash quark ...

you could have changed that if you had access to the stratum Wink

... hehehe ...

will leave it for a a couple of hours ... donating while we test ...

#crysx

sp_

legendary

Activity: 2926

Merit: 1087

Team Black developer

Quote

Thanks for all the hard work, sp_.

Hey, what coin(s) are the buyers of hashpower at west/nice hash and yaamp mining? Specifically, Quark algorithm, as I believe DASH is one of the most popular for X11.

I mean, if they see it as wise to pay to have other people's rigs mine for them, I am interested in what coin(s) they are seeing as worth it.

Anyone? Bueller?

On yaamp if you click on the right page you will find this:

If you want to support the coins you should but your coin adress in the miner field instead of you btc adress. Then the mined coins will not be traded on the exchange, but sendt directly to your wallet.

chrysophylax

legendary

Activity: 2912

Merit: 1091

--- ChainWorks Industries ---

Quote from: sp_ on May 08, 2015, 02:51:54 AM

Quote from: chrysophylax on May 08, 2015, 01:54:11 AM

have you seen the mining on westhash? ...
#crysx

Doing good, but the hashrate is fluctating alot
from
22MHASH to 55.52MHASH. I think the difficulty is too high. You might want to set a fixed difficulty f.ex -p d=0.04 to get a more accurate result.

https://www.westhash.com/?p=miners&a=12&addr=1CTiNJyoUmbdMRACtteRWXhGqtSETYd6Vd

Thanks for your support.

ok - in the office now ...

will set the difficulty as per your suggestion ...

lets see how it goes

...

support is what you need mate - donation support for the awesome work you ( and so many other devs ) are doing to make all this happen ...

so - you are welcome ...

...

#crysx

Topic: CCminer(SP-MOD) Modded NVIDIA Maxwell / Pascal kernels. - page 1101. (Read 2347601 times)